Skip to main content

Rwanda opposition calls for reforms ahead of September elections


Rwanda opposition calls for reforms ahead of September elections

SHARE BOOKMARKPRINTRATING
By EMMANUEL RUTAYISIRE Special Correspondent

Posted  Saturday, May 11  2013 at  16:23
IN SUMMARY
  • Rwanda goes to the polls this September under a stringent legal regime governing political parties that requires members of political parties to apply for permission from the government to hold demonstrations and public meetings, five days in advance.

With barely four months to go before the parliamentary elections, opposition politicians are pushing for reforms in the electoral process in order to guarantee a competitive process.
Rwanda goes to the polls this September under a stringent legal regime governing political parties that requires members of political parties to apply for permission from the government to hold demonstrations and public meetings, five days in advance.
The Political Organisations Act, passed by the Senate this month, also bars politicians who have served jail sentences of more than five years from seeking elective office.
Frank Habineza of the Democratic Green Party (DGP) said: "The new law is tougher than the old one. Under the old law, parties just had to inform the government of their intention to hold demonstrations or meetings, but now you have to apply for permission."
The elections come at a critical moment — in the middle of a raging debate on the political course the country should take in 2017, when President Paul Kagame's constitutional term in office expires.
Political observers say the upcoming parliamentary elections need to be more competitive if they are to produce a parliament that is capable of navigating the nation through the upcoming transition.
In February this year, President Kagame caught many off-guard when he encouraged his political party, the Rwanda Patriotic Front, to debate the country's political transition come 2017.
Political observers say whether President Kagame retires in 2017 or not, a constitutional amendment of some sort must happen and the transition debate can no longer be a preserve of the ruling RPF, but will have to move to the national assembly.
This, analysts say, will require a vibrant parliament that is capable of playing a pivotal role in the country's transition and should be composed of at least some people espousing a different political narrative, outside RPF's influence.
This will be the third parliamentary election under RPF's 19-year rule.
Parliamentarians in Rwanda do not belong to a particular constituency — they are handpicked by their parties depending on the seats won in the elections.
The Constitution provides for proportional representation, the reason some analysts say legislators' first loyalty is to their respective political parties, not citizens.
This voting pattern sets Rwanda and Burundi apart from other EAC member states where parliamentarians are voted in through universal suffrage. This, in part, is why some political observers say the two countries have relatively weaker parliaments.
Rwanda has 10 registered political parties, all believed to be under the influence of RPF; according to analysts, these parties seem generally not to have ambitions to vie for political power.
Mr Habineza says authorities at Gasabo district denied his Green Democratic Party permission to convene a congress meeting, which is a precondition to have the party registered. The decision by the district authorities, observers say, could not have been made without tacit approval of senior officials of the ruling RPF.
Mr Habineza says his party's ambition to have representatives in the forthcoming house could be thwarted by the events of last week.
"We have spent close to four years now, trying to register our party," the opposition politician said.
The other opposition political parties that could have provided the envisioned different narrative are PS Imberakuri of Bernard Ntaganda and FDU Inkingi of Victoire Ingabire — but their leaders are serving jail terms.
"We need people with great ideas and agendas. Some people like to put on other people's shirts for no reason. Rwanda has its peculiar situation," said Dr Joseph Karemera, a retired senator and member of RPF's national executive committee.
A senior university don speaking on condition of anonymity cast serious doubt on whether any politician with divergent views will enter the forthcoming parliament.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute