Skip to main content

UK: Oxford University distances itself from inviting President Paul Kagame to give him an award


Oxford University distances itself from inviting President Paul Kagame to give him an award.

Africa_KagameThe office of the Dean of the Said Business School, University of Oxford has distanced itself from extending an invitation to President Kagame and having any intention of granting him an award for they are aware that he is a controversial figure.
The office of the Dean has clarified that the"Oxford Africa Business Conference that Paul Kagame is to address is a student-led event, held by the Oxford Business Network for Africa, a student organisation.  The Dean's Office also clarified that the "award would be given by the students association and not the university". The event is about economic growth in Africa and Paul Kagame was to receive an award called 'A distinction of Honour for African Growth.
The clarification from the Office of the Dean is a response to serious concerns raised by communities from the Great Lakes region and friends of Africa who considered the invitation not only as a stab in the back of millions of people who lost their loved ones at the hands of Paul Kagame's army or through his proxy wars but also as an insult to African dignity to present a person accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity as a beacon for African economic development.
It is well documented that Paul Kagame is heavily involved in wars that have caused the death of more than 6 million people in the Great Lakes, the highest humanitarian disaster since the 2nd world war and his army has been accused of having committed war crimes, crimes against humanity and potentially acts of genocide.  A UN experts report confirmed that that the Rwandan government was complicit in war crimes for arming and providing logistical support to the murderous M23 guerrillas in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo. This report led to the suspension of aid from key allies including the UK and the US.
The office of the Dean has made it crystal clear that "this invitation and President Kagame's presence in the Saïd Business School does not imply any endorsement by the School or the University of his views or actions". It pointed out that it was aware Paul Kagame was a "controversial figure" and has suggested that his presence was an" opportunity for those present to challenge him as appropriate".
The revelations are likely to be a big blow to the public relations campaign to reverse the mounting criticism of Paul Kagame and his regime. The Sunday Times had revealed that Portland, a London public relations company run by Tim Allan, a key adviser when Blair was premier, had met Rwandan officials in an attempt to win a contract for "country branding" said to be worth more than £1m[1]
It would be interesting to know if the students did not fall prey to public relations firms, the Rwandan High Commission or any other agents in the rebranding of the tarnished image of President Kagame. The Oxford University should learn from the embarrassment suffered by the London School of Economics due to its relations with Kaddafi regime. It is dealing with a worse despot than Kaddafi[2].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute