Skip to main content

Fw: *DHR* Rwandan officials 'aiding and abetting war crimes in Congo' - Telegraph



Rwandan officials 'aiding and abetting war crimes in Congo'
Andrew Mitchell, the former International Development Secretary, claims that Rwanda had made
Andrew Mitchell, the former International Development Secretary, claims that Rwanda had made "progress" towards satisfying Britain's concerns about its support for rebels in Congo.
Picture: Reuters
By Mike Pflanz in NairobiLast Updated: 4:31PM BST 11/09/2012
Senior officials in Rwanda could face justice for "aiding and abetting" war crimes in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Human Rights Watch said, a week after Britain restored its aid for the country's government.
The Department for International Development became the first Western donor to restart aid payments to Rwanda last Tuesday. Britain had withheld £16 million after United Nations investigators found that Rwanda armed and supplied the "M23" guerrilla movement in neighbouring Congo.
But Andrew Mitchell, the former International Development Secretary,released this sum on his last day in office, claiming that Rwanda had made "progress" towards satisfying Britain's concerns about its support for rebels in Congo.
In fact, Rwanda has recruited 600 fighters for the M23 rebels, according to an investigation by Human Rights Watch, with this taking place "either by force or under false pretences". Recruitment was happening as recently as last month - exactly the time when Mr Mitchell said that Rwanda was acting to allay British concerns.
In July, Rwanda sent "several hundred" soldiers into Congo to help the rebels capture three towns and a border post. With direct military support from Rwanda, M23 guerrillas have carried out "widespread war crimes, including summary executions, rapes and forced recruitment," said the rights group, adding that some of those forced into its ranks as soldiers were children under the age of 15.
"The M23 rebels are committing a horrific trail of new atrocities in eastern Congo," said Anneke Van Woudenberg, senior Africa researcher at Human Rights Watch.
"M23 commanders should be held accountable for these crimes, and the Rwandan officials supporting these abusive commanders could face justice for aiding and abetting the crimes."
Human Rights Watch has documented the recruitment of at least 137 young men and boys in Rutshuru territory, eastern Congo, by M23 rebels since July. At least seven were under the age of 15.
Witnesses told researchers that at least 33 new recruits and other M23 fighters were summarily executed when they attempted to flee. Some were tied up and shot in front of other recruits as an example of the punishment they could receive.
"When we were with the M23, they said [we had a choice] and could stay with them or we could die," one young recruit was reported as saying.
"Lots of people tried to escape. Some were found and then that was immediately their death."
The M23 rebellion began as a mutiny inside Congo's national army. Bosco Ntaganda, a renegade general who leads the rebels, is the target of two arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.




__._,_.___


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute