Analytical and empirical linkages between poverty, employment, agricultural growth and gender
Introduction:
· Gender disparities in basic rights; in access to schooling, credit, and jobs take their most direct toll on women and girls, the evidence shows that gender inequality ultimately hinders economic growth.
· Gender differentials in other areas such as access to land and complementary agricultural inputs, labour force participation and labour productivity also matter for economic growth.
Who is the Poor?
· Farmers and self-employed- small ‘substance farmers’, people living in rural areas ( Africa 60% to 80%a)-smallholders, substance and peasant categories, considered as homogenous , sharing the characteristics of poverty, Female Headed Households
· Poverty and gender: a) women as self-employed farmers, including women working on their own family’s farm, or b) Female headed Household in rural areas.
Facts (Sender and Abhijit et al)
· changes in women ‘s employment patterns due access to non--agriculture employment, increased casualisation in the labour force, access to education, e.g. women aspire non-agriculture jobs or non self-employment jobs.
· Men continue to benefit priced inputs including access to credits and fertilisers.
· Women lack of secure, sufficient and fertile lands. Solution: promote non-farm self-employment; e.g. retailing enterprises, food processing, hairdressing, etc.
· Shift to non-agricultural employment resulting from the inability of agriculture to generate the means for adequate livelihood to those born in farming families
· Increase share of agriculture is accompanied by decrease in rural employment rates ( particularly for daily status) along with casual labour contracts
Policy responses
· Role of the state in creating the environment for particular patterns to emerge and moulding specific changes in employment behaviour (India )
· The poor will benefit when policies are introduced to provide them with prices incentives.
· Priced inputs into farming operations e.g.- seeds, planting materials, fertilisers and agro-chemicals, micro-credit programmes, new techniques, improved varieties , pests and diseases threats, etc.
· constraints: distorted , discriminatory rural credits market
· Promoting self-employment, market deregulation, decentralisation to ensure capital inflows. But self-employment and price incentives to increase farm outputs in reducing in reducing female poverty is unsatisfactory.
· State intervention in rural markets for poverty reduction (e.g. stabilising of price of grains has played a key role in reducing rural poverty since 1950s( India)
· State investments to increase the stability of the rate of growth of agriculture production – water control and irrigation programmes.
Challenges:
· Insufficient of country-level work that will help in assembling robust country-level evidence on the links between gender equality and economic growth and poverty reduction and on the efficacy of alternative public actions to address the key aspects of gender inequality.
· Limitations of existing analytical tools and methods are still a constraint in building such an evidence base at the country level. Insufficient knowledge about the impacts of specific policies.
· Lack of reliable sex-disaggregated data continues to be a serious problem, particularly in low-income countries. – Need to improve statistical systems at the country level and to adapt the design of household surveys. (World Bank)
· Lack for reliable data of those employed in small–scale farms and rural enterprises , especially on the wages of those who are irregularly, seasonably , or casually employed-More research to trends in rural female wages ( J. Sender).
Discussion:
Promoting self-employment may not be a sustainable solution e.g. waste of time and resources to promote the sector. Poverty reduction is possible when labour force become employed for wages ( e.g. OECD countries)
No comments:
Post a Comment