Former
African colonies aren't poor, and France, UK rich because of wealth theft. Or
are they?
F you get
involved in online debates about economic history, it won’t be long before
someone tells you that the West is rich because it stole the resources of the
regions it colonised. This stolen-wealth theory is cited as the reason the U.K.
and France are rich today, while Ethiopia and Burundi are poor.
It also is sometimes used to argue that global capitalism is
inherently unjust and that wealth must be radically redistributed between
nations as compensation.
The problem is, the stolen-wealth theory is wrong.
Oh, it’s absolutely true that colonial powers stole natural
resources from the lands they conquered. No one disputes that. And at the time,
this definitely made the colonised regions a lot poorer.
The U.K., for example, caused repeated famines in India by
raising taxes on farmers and by encouraging the cultivation of cash crops
instead of subsistence crops. That is a pretty stark example of destructive resource
extraction.
It’s also probably true that this stolen wealth helped much of
the West get rich.
Limits of stolen-wealth theory
Of course, Western countries didn’t simply consume the resources
they plundered—the global economy isn’t just a lump of wealth that gets divvied
up, but rather relies on the productive efforts of individuals, companies and
governments.
The U.K., for example, was able to industrialise not by
consuming spices confiscated from India, but because its citizens invented
power looms and steam engines and other technologies, and because its people
worked very hard at factories and plants that used those technologies.
But steam engines and power looms and other industrial machinery
required raw materials like coal and rubber as inputs.
When those materials became less expensive, it became cheaper to
substitute machines for human labour. That means that some of the resources
stolen from colonies probably did give Britain and France part of the boost
they needed to jump-start the industrialisation that eventually made them
wealthy.
More:
No comments:
Post a Comment