Skip to main content

[afrocarpus] Re: [Aframom] Nice attack: Why France is struggling to cope with the terror threat (BBC’s wrong analysis)

 

The policy of dispersion of migrants and  refugees  across the whole UK has contributed to increasing  British people's worries about immigration.
 
For example, one or two new  migrant persons in an area where there was no migrants before, can  make residents  think that  there are  too many migrants in the area. This is why many rural areas voted to leave UK.


On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 16:40, "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [Aframom]" <Aframom@yahoogroupes.fr> wrote:


 

 According to BBC:

"Age of insecurity
Immigration has a long history here, integration does not.
There are large populations from France's former colonies, places like Tunisia.
Some feel their religious beliefs are trampled by a secularism that is fiercely guarded. Some see little hope in a nation which denies them a chance of success.
The forgotten suburbs that house large numbers of immigrants have erupted into protest and violence in previous years.
They are policed by tough units that fail to reflect the communities they control. It is an unhappy mix that can open the way for a minority to be radicalised and moved to violent action".

More:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36810932
 
 
Comments:
 
In UK, for the last 15 years, migrants and refugees have been dispersed across  the whole UK, from  North to South and from  East to West.  
UK politicians and media seem to confuse this  system  with integration. This system has contributed to  hiding poverty and inequality that many refugees and migrants area facing now in the UK. The UK policy is to hide migrants and refugees across the UK.
 
These  migrants and refugees live in isolation and in  poor houses  which have been abandoned  by  white residents. When migrants and refugees are dispersed in white  people's areas, the white populations leave the areas. Then  with the remaining white population, you  feel isolated because you have no-one to talk to and no-one  will  talk to you. When you are facing this situation, you too, you  move for example to London  or other areas where you can find other refugees and migrants.
 
In conclusion, having migrants and  refugees living together in the same areas is not a bad thing. What is bad is racism, poverty and discrimination that they may  face  wherever they live.
 
 


On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 15:56, "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [afrocarpus]" <afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
The propaganda linking inequality and deprivation to justify terrorism attacks in France  is currently carried out by BBC, CNN and some French politicians and academics. Frank Gardner of BBC even goes far by saying that terrorism in France is caused by the ban of burqa dress in France. This is an example of poor judgement. This thinking is fuelling terrorism in Europe.  In Africa,  some countries with predominant Muslim populations have  banned burqa and no terrorism is taking place there. UK should ban burqa as well instead of keeping it because of fear of being targeted by terrorism.


On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 15:50, "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [Aframom]" <Aframom@yahoogroupes.fr> wrote:


 
The propaganda linking inequality and deprivation to justify terrorism attacks in France  is currently carried out by BBC, CNN and some French politicians and academics. Frank Gardner of BBC even go far by saying that terrorism in France is caused by the ban of burqa dress in France. This is an example of poor judgement. This thinking is fuelling terrorism in Europe.  In Africa,  some countries with predominant Muslim populations have  banned burqa and no terrorism is taking place there. UK should ban burqa as well instead of keeping it because of fear of being targeted by terrorism.
 

On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 11:11, "Migrants Network migrantsnetwork@gmail.com [afrocarpus]" <afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Poor judgment about terrorism, inequality  and deprivation linkages in France and Europe.
 
I do not agree with some international media, some politicians and international academics that terror in France is caused by deprivation, discrimination  and youth's lack of opportunities.
 
This analysis  is flawed because it does not explain  why all terror attacks are carried out by y Muslim people only who  live in the same deprived areas where other ethnic communities live. Deprivation, discrimination  and youth's lack of opportunities are prevalent in all ethnic communities  in Europe including Black and Asian communities who are not Muslims. Why Christian ethnic communities are not involved in terrorist attacks while they also experience deprivation, inequality and lack of opportunities?

No reasonable person can justify her/his terrorism  acts and killings of innocent people by  inequality and  lack of opportunities.
 








__._,_.___

Posted by: Afrika Watch <afrikawatch@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)

Save time and get your email on the go with the Yahoo Mail app
Get the beautifully designed, lighting fast, and easy-to-use Yahoo Mail today. Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: afrocarpus-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: afrocarpus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: afrocarpus-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.datinginafrica.com/

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions amĂ©ricaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni PubliĂ© en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusĂ© d'exĂ©cutions extrajudiciaires, de dĂ©placements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systĂ©matique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la rĂ©ponse diplomatique attendue est un dĂ©menti catĂ©gorique, Ă©tayĂ© par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le dĂ©partement amĂ©ricain du TrĂ©sor a imposĂ© des sanctions aux Forces de dĂ©fense rwandaises (FDR) et Ă  quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placĂ©s, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a dĂ©livrĂ© une dĂ©claration que les analystes diplomatiques Ă©tudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions Ă©taient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placĂ© le Rwanda lĂ -bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le dĂ©ploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dĂ©gâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   RĂ©sumĂ© exĂ©cutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de DĂ©fense du Rwanda (RDF), imposĂ©es par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayĂ©es par une pression croissante de l'Union europĂ©enne, ont mis Ă  nu une contradiction stratĂ©gique de premier ordre. La mĂŞme force militaire sanctionnĂ©e pour son soutien opĂ©rationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo est simultanĂ©ment le principal garant sĂ©curitaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquĂ©fiĂ© (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploitĂ© par le gĂ©ant français TotalEnergies Ă  Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse rĂ©pond Ă  trois questions interconnectĂ©es dont les rĂ©ponses dĂ©finissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute