Skip to main content

Re: [afrocarpus] Nice attack: Why France is struggling to cope with the terror threat (BBC’s wrong analysis)

 

The continuous justification of terrorism attacks  by poverty and  inequality among Migrants in France is ridiculous.


The international media and  academics  who try make these justifications should release  the figures to demonstrate that Migrants in France are the poorest in Europe.  These experts need to explain why only Muslim migrants have to use violence to claim  for better integration and equality.


Yes, it is true that many of these migrants live in deprived areas of  France. But this also applies to UK and other European nations.


Discrimination , injustice, prejudice against migrants and ethnic minorities are prevalent in all Western countries. Furthermore, these migrants  who commit terrorism live with other migrants and  disadvantaged white people in these deprived areas.

 

In UK, migrants  and refugees are  packed in  dirty towers  located in the most deprived areas of Europe or  overcrowded houses which are not suitable for humans. There are also  poor white people living in these areas.

1)    Instead of committing terrorism in the name of  religion and associated practices, Migrants who live in France and want to wear burqa should leave France and go to live in UK before the UK leaves EU.

2)    Migrants who feel discriminated against or are poor in France should also go to settle in UK or other EU countries where they can enjoy a better life.

3)    Killing innocents people because you are poor is unacceptable.

4)    Muslim communities and associations need to understand that  you cannot be expected to  be treated well by neighbours and services  or  have access to opportunities when you kill innocent civilians.


On 16 July 2016 at 16:37, Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [afrocarpus] <afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 


 According to BBC:

"Age of insecurity
Immigration has a long history here, integration does not.
There are large populations from France's former colonies, places like Tunisia.
Some feel their religious beliefs are trampled by a secularism that is fiercely guarded. Some see little hope in a nation which denies them a chance of success.
The forgotten suburbs that house large numbers of immigrants have erupted into protest and violence in previous years.
They are policed by tough units that fail to reflect the communities they control. It is an unhappy mix that can open the way for a minority to be radicalised and moved to violent action".

More:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36810932
 
 
Comments:
 
In UK, for the last 15 years, migrants and refugees have been dispersed across  the whole UK, from  North to South and from  East to West.  
UK politicians and media seem to confuse this  system  with integration. This system has contributed to  hiding poverty and inequality that many refugees and migrants area facing now in the UK. The UK policy is to hide migrants and refugees across the UK.
 
These  migrants and refugees live in isolation and in  poor houses  which have been abandoned  by  white residents. When migrants and refugees are dispersed in white  people's areas, the white populations leave the areas. Then  with the remaining white population, you  feel isolated because you have no-one to talk to and no-one  will  talk to you. When you are facing this situation, you too, you  move for example to London  or other areas where you can find other refugees and migrants.
 
In conclusion, having migrants and  refugees living together in the same areas is not a bad thing. What is bad is racism, poverty and discrimination that they may  face  wherever they live.
 
 


On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 15:56, "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [afrocarpus]" <afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
The propaganda linking inequality and deprivation to justify terrorism attacks in France  is currently carried out by BBC, CNN and some French politicians and academics. Frank Gardner of BBC even goes far by saying that terrorism in France is caused by the ban of burqa dress in France. This is an example of poor judgement. This thinking is fuelling terrorism in Europe.  In Africa,  some countries with predominant Muslim populations have  banned burqa and no terrorism is taking place there. UK should ban burqa as well instead of keeping it because of fear of being targeted by terrorism.


On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 15:50, "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [Aframom]" <Aframom@yahoogroupes.fr> wrote:


 
The propaganda linking inequality and deprivation to justify terrorism attacks in France  is currently carried out by BBC, CNN and some French politicians and academics. Frank Gardner of BBC even go far by saying that terrorism in France is caused by the ban of burqa dress in France. This is an example of poor judgement. This thinking is fuelling terrorism in Europe.  In Africa,  some countries with predominant Muslim populations have  banned burqa and no terrorism is taking place there. UK should ban burqa as well instead of keeping it because of fear of being targeted by terrorism.
 

On Saturday, 16 July 2016, 11:11, "Migrants Network migrantsnetwork@gmail.com [afrocarpus]" <afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Poor judgment about terrorism, inequality  and deprivation linkages in France and Europe.
 
I do not agree with some international media, some politicians and international academics that terror in France is caused by deprivation, discrimination  and youth's lack of opportunities.
 
This analysis  is flawed because it does not explain  why all terror attacks are carried out by y Muslim people only who  live in the same deprived areas where other ethnic communities live. Deprivation, discrimination  and youth's lack of opportunities are prevalent in all ethnic communities  in Europe including Black and Asian communities who are not Muslims. Why Christian ethnic communities are not involved in terrorist attacks while they also experience deprivation, inequality and lack of opportunities?

No reasonable person can justify her/his terrorism  acts and killings of innocent people by  inequality and  lack of opportunities.
 







__._,_.___

Posted by: Migrants Network <migrantsnetwork@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)

Save time and get your email on the go with the Yahoo Mail app
Get the beautifully designed, lighting fast, and easy-to-use Yahoo Mail today. Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  afrocarpus@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: afrocarpus-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: afrocarpus-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: afrocarpus-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.datinginafrica.com/

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions amĂ©ricaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni PubliĂ© en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusĂ© d'exĂ©cutions extrajudiciaires, de dĂ©placements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systĂ©matique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la rĂ©ponse diplomatique attendue est un dĂ©menti catĂ©gorique, Ă©tayĂ© par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le dĂ©partement amĂ©ricain du TrĂ©sor a imposĂ© des sanctions aux Forces de dĂ©fense rwandaises (FDR) et Ă  quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placĂ©s, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a dĂ©livrĂ© une dĂ©claration que les analystes diplomatiques Ă©tudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions Ă©taient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute