Skip to main content

DRC: Mapping human rights violations 1993-2003

In the wake of the discovery of three mass graves in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in late 2005, the United Nations first announced its intention to send a human rights team to conduct a mapping exercise in DRC in a June 2006 report to the Security Council.
In May 2007, the UN Secretary-General approved the terms of reference of the mapping exercise following a series of consultations among relevant UN agencies and partners and with the Congolese government

The mapping exercise, led by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) had three objectives:
• Conduct a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003.
• Assess the existing capacities within the national justice system to deal appropriately with such human rights violations that may be uncovered.
• Formulate a series of options aimed at assisting the Government of the DRC in identifying appropriate transitional justice mechanisms to deal with the legacy of these violations, in terms of truth, justice, reparation and reform, taking into account ongoing efforts by the DRC authorities, as well as the support of the international community.

The mapping exercise began in July 2008. Between October 2008 and May 2009, a total of 33 staff worked on the project in the DRC (including Congolese and international human rights experts). Of these, some 20 human rights officers were deployed across the country, operating out of five field offices, to gather documents and information from witnesses to meet the three objectives defined in the terms of reference. The report was submitted to the High Commissioner for Human Rights in June 2009 for review, comments and finalisation.

The mapping team's 550-page report contains descriptions of 617 alleged violent incidents occurring in the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003. Each of these incidents points to the possible commission of gross violations of human rights and/or international humanitarian law. Each of the incidents listed is backed up by at least two independent sources identified in the report. As serious as they may be, uncorroborated incidents claimed by one single source are not included. Over 1,500 documents relating to human rights violations committed during this period were gathered and analysed with a view to establishing an initial chronology by region of the main violent incidents reported. Only incidents meeting a 'gravity threshold' set out in the methodology were considered. Field mapping teams met with over 1,280 witnesses to corroborate or invalidate the violations listed in the chronology. Information was also collected on previously undocumented crimes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions amĂ©ricaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni PubliĂ© en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusĂ© d'exĂ©cutions extrajudiciaires, de dĂ©placements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systĂ©matique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la rĂ©ponse diplomatique attendue est un dĂ©menti catĂ©gorique, Ă©tayĂ© par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le dĂ©partement amĂ©ricain du TrĂ©sor a imposĂ© des sanctions aux Forces de dĂ©fense rwandaises (FDR) et Ă  quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placĂ©s, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a dĂ©livrĂ© une dĂ©claration que les analystes diplomatiques Ă©tudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions Ă©taient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placĂ© le Rwanda lĂ -bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le dĂ©ploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dĂ©gâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   RĂ©sumĂ© exĂ©cutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de DĂ©fense du Rwanda (RDF), imposĂ©es par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayĂ©es par une pression croissante de l'Union europĂ©enne, ont mis Ă  nu une contradiction stratĂ©gique de premier ordre. La mĂŞme force militaire sanctionnĂ©e pour son soutien opĂ©rationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo est simultanĂ©ment le principal garant sĂ©curitaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquĂ©fiĂ© (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploitĂ© par le gĂ©ant français TotalEnergies Ă  Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse rĂ©pond Ă  trois questions interconnectĂ©es dont les rĂ©ponses dĂ©finissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute