Skip to main content

Regional leaders decide on Congo crisis

Regional leaders decide on Congo crisisPublish Date: Nov 25, 2012
Regional leaders decide on Congo crisis
  • mail
  • img
DRC President Joseph Kabila and South Sudan minister of commerce and investments, Garanga Dung Akwang (R). PHOTO/Eddie Ssejjoba.
newvision
By Vision Reporter

MUNYONYO, Kampala - President Yoweri Museveni on Saturday closed the 5th Extraordinary Summit of the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region (ICGLR) which took place at Speke Resort Munyonyo in Kampala.

Leaders from the region attended the meeting which sought a last solution to the current crisis on the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

President Museveni's guests Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete flew in shortly after DRC's Joseph Kabila Saturday morning. Kenyan leader Mwai Kibaki moments later also showed up for the one-day summit.

The Summit highlighted the end of violence and restoration of government control in the rebel-captured town of Goma in eastern DRC, an official statement showed.

A resolution was reached to have President Kabila's government listen to and resolve the grievances of the rebel group M23 which is at the heart of the ongoing fighting in the country.

According to the statement delivered by Uganda's minister of foreign affairs, Sam Kutesa, the leaders want the M23 rebels to stop spreading the war and also stop their talk of overthrowing "an elected government".

The regional leaders demanded the withdrawal of the insurgents "from the current positions to the ground of tactical importance not less than 20km north of Goma."

Several other decisions were made during the meet.

The leaders decided to deploy a composite Force comprising one company of neutral force, one company of FARDC and one company of M23 at Goma airport.

And in Goma town, the deployment of one battalion of FARDC (country's military) and the DRC national Police that was deployed there before was resolved.

The Police who were disarmed in Goma by the M23 rebels would be rearmed so that they resume duty and that MONUSCO should occupy and provide security in the neutral zone between Goma and the new areas occupied by the rebels.

The leaders further declared that the process will be supervised by the Chiefs of Defense Staff of Rwanda, DRC and led by the Chief of Defense Forces of Uganda.

They concluded that the Chiefs of Defense of other ICGLR member states shall be informed of the implementation of the decisions made.

Rwanda's president Paul Kagame did not attend the meeting but had been in Kampala earlier this week engaged in talks with Presidents Museveni and Kabila over the crisis.
http://www.newvision.co.ug/news/637569-regional-leaders-decide-on-congo-crisis.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute