Skip to main content

Congo rebels loot central bank in Goma


Congo rebels loot central bank in Goma

M23 fighters are seen surrounding bank and loading bags into cars after refusing to withdraw from city

The M23 spokesman Bishop Jean-Marie Runiga. Photograph: Phil Moore/AFP/Getty Images

Congo rebels have looted the central bank in Goma after refusing to withdraw from the city they captured last week.

M23 fighters surrounded the bank early this afternoon, and were seen loading white bags into cars. The rebel soldiers looked nervous and ordered the Guardian to leave the area.

"They're looting the bank," a UN source said.

Earlier on Tuesday the rebel leader Bishop Jean-Marie Runiga said M23 would refuse to obey a call by regional leaders of the International Conference of the Great Lakes to leave the capital of North Kivu province to pave the way for peace talks.

A withdrawal would be the result, not a precondition, of negotiation, Runiga said.

"I demand the following of [the Congolese president] Joseph Kabila, if M23 is to withdraw [from Goma]," he said at a press conference in Goma, before outlining a series of conditions. Notably, he demanded freedom for the opposition leader Etienne Tshisekedi and other political prisoners, the dissolution of the electoral commission, and an investigation into the attempted murder of Dr Denis Mukwege.

"If [Kabila] does this then there is no problem, we can talk immediately about leaving the town," said Runiga.

A spokesman for the Democratic Republic of the Congo government, Lambert Mende, told Reuters these conditions were a farce. "It's a farce, that's the word," he said. "There's been a document adopted by the region [to move towards negotiations]. If each day they're going to come back with new demands it becomes ridiculous. We're no longer in the realms of seriousness."

The army spokesman Colonel Olivier Hamuli said his forces would take action against the rebels. "If they will not leave Goma then war will continue," he said. "We must recapture the territory that the rebels have taken."

Meanwhile there were reports of an attack by the extremist rebel Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), who are enemies of the M23, over the border in Rwanda. Brigadier General Joseph Nzabamwita, the Rwandan army spokesman, told Reuters 150 rebel fighters attacked villages in Rwanda near the Congolese border. FDLR denied their involvement.

Runiga accused the Congolese army of collaborating in the operation, a claim denied by the Congolese army.

"M23 control the border [with Rwanda]. Where are we supposed to have crossed?" asked the Hamuli, the army spokesman.

There were reports of fighting between the Congolese army and M23 near the village of Shasha about 21 miles (35km) west of Goma overnight between Monday and Tuesday. A UN source said that neither the army nor M23 had significantly changed their positions after the clash.

M23 is a reference to 23 March, the day in 2009 when the Congolese government signed a peace deal with various rebel groups operating in the east of the country. M23 wants to discuss these accords which, it says, were not adhered to by the government. However, Runiga on Tuesday said their demands now went further than simply revisiting the three-year-old peace deal.

"Between 2009 and 2012 many things have happened. There are many problems in Congo which persist," he said. "We want negotiations, but only on the condition that we re-evaluate [the 2009] accords and also deal with fundamental questions about the life of the nation." Corruption, infrastructure, education, health, security and democracy were all on M23's agenda for discussion, Runiga said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute