Skip to main content

Fw: [rwanda_revolution] A VERY REASON IT DROPS MY JAW WHEN AN AFRICAN BLEATS FOR OBAMA IS IN WASHINGTON. But as Museveni, Obama targeted the low IQ's


Subject: [rwanda_revolution] A VERY REASON IT DROPS MY JAW WHEN AN AFRICAN BLEATS FOR OBAMA IS IN WASHINGTON. But as Museveni, Obama targeted the low IQ's

 
US makes frantic efforts to take over Africa
 
Prof. James Mbwabwadze
 
THE United States of America, the world's colossus, with the temerity to trample upon smaller nations, has made frantic efforts to take over Africa by laying siege to the continent's vast natural resource base, through a more subtle colonialism.
 
This is done by exerting pressure on African states through regime change and the formation of a military unit, Africom, to specifically deal with Africa and control the continent's oil, land, minerals and other natural resources.
 
Everywhere where diamonds are found, the eye of the  United States turns red with envy and desire to exploit. Everywhere where there is gold the US huge muscles twitch and everywhere where there is a revolutionary African leader protecting African interests, the US regime change antics make it drool.
 
The US has become the self-styled world policeman, with tentacles spreading all over the world in a dangerous and cruel, plunder game that involves military escapades. Africa is the centre and future ground of natural resources' exploitation because it still remains largely untapped and wild.
 
Ultra-high technology is yet to be used to extract natural resources, hence there is a lot yet to be unearthed and there lies Africa's source of problems — remaining with what others have already exploited to almost extinction.
 
The US idea is to wipe out all revolutionary parties and replace them with pro-Western governments that will allow it to mine and plunder resources at will. Under the plan, all revolutionary parties that fought protracted liberation struggles since the Winds of Change period in 1960s must soon be a thing of the past and pave way for a crop of new "democratic political parties" that are manufactured along the lines of Eurocentric democracy.
 
Democracy, good governance and accountability in the perception and context of America and its allies, and not necessarily in the eyes of Africans themselves and the world at large, are catchwords pushed down the throats of the rabid media. That media, which in Africa are called "independent'' media (independent from African thinking), are sponsored to eccentrically demonise anti-Western African leaders, while propping up opposition parties created by America and its allies.
 
To maintain a foothold on this ideology and push forward the agenda, African revolutionary parties are seen as breeding grounds for anti-American leaders and therefore should be decimated. All revolutionary parties are therefore sold on the international media market as "evil and dictatorial" and hence have no place in modern-day democracy.
 
In that warped mantra, the new political forces, dubbed democratic forces, are therefore God-sent to remove the evil dictators of Africa and godly allow America to plunder Africa's resources. Only when you allow America to harvest Africa's fruits, mine Africa's minerals, speak their American language, dress like Americans, disrespect African leaders, does one become a democrat and human rights activist. Any perceived harassment by African revolutionary governments then makes the person a hero, who deserves full protection.
 
Therefore, all progressive-thinking Africans should move in to thwart the militarisation of Africa through Africom — the US superior military command — to enable Africa to operate without lingering military duress. Not many African leaders can make anti-American decisions with an American army hovering above their country. Robert Mugabe, yes, and, to a certain extent, Yoweri Museveni and the late Bingu wa Mutharika, Muammar Gaddafi, among a few others.
 
The rest do not have the tenacity. Africa will have no one but itself to blame if it fails to come up with its own military unit for use in trouble spots in order to retain its capacity to defend its sovereignty and independence. Africom is also a tool meant to protect US interests in Africa, while at the same time elbowing out other countries who wish to deal with Africa in trade, industry and commerce.
 
Africa still has untapped uranium, platinum, oil and still has some of the world's best soils for agriculture, hence America has identified Africa as the pinnacle of future world development. Africa's resources should be negotiated and traded on fair deals and not plundered by America, Britain, France or Australia.
 
They must buy on a willing buyer, willing seller basis. No force! For America it is critical to plunder and accumulate, in its national strategic reserves, as much natural resources as possible ahead of every other nation, to ensure that it remains the richest nation in the world forever and ever, amen.
 
The American army cannot just come into Africa openly so it requires conflicts and strife, which it then uses to justify occupation of African countries as peacekeepers, but behind the scenes, America will be mining diamonds, gold, platinum, uranium and so forth and enriching itself at the expense of Africans.
 
Once they come in as peacekeepers, the Americans are so superior militarily that no one can push them out. They will only pull out when they are satisfied that they have plundered enough, not only to cover war costs but to keep the country going for a decade or two. Africa, therefore, needs on a long-term basis, an army answerable to the African Union that can be used in all troubled spots. It is a fact that this is no mean task, but Africa should, going forward, be able to establish its own army as lessons in Libya have become handy.
 
An African army operating under the AU mandate is the best thing for Africa. Many critics have argued that Africa has no capacity to build the army, but that is not true because if African countries sell their natural resources at market value, they can pool their resources and sponsor brigades at regional level. Region after region then seconds a thousand or so personnel to the continental army, and that is a good starting point.
 
*          The article first appeared on Day Africa.com
 
 
           Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy"
           
Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"
 
__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute