Skip to main content

Jailed Rwandan politician slams 'ridiculous' case on appeal


Jailed Rwandan politician slams 'ridiculous' case on appeal

Facebook
14
0
19
PlacardENLARGE
(Globalpost/GlobalPost)
What do you think?
0
Must read
0
Suprising
0
Tragic
0
Inspiring
0
Odd!
Jailed Rwandan opposition figure Victoire Ingabire on Wednesday urged the country's top court to reject prosecution demands to increase her eight-year sentence on appeal, saying her case was marred by irregularities.
Ingabire was found guilty last October of terrorism and denying the country's 1994 genocide, but charges of spreading genocide ideology and of "setting up an armed group" were dropped.
Prosecutors launched an appeal with the Supreme Court that began in March, asking for her punishment to be increased to 25 years and calling for judges to reconsider the dropped charges.
In Wednesday's appeal hearing, Ingabire urged the court to dismiss those demands.
"The High Court rejected the charge of supporting an armed group, but charged me for having wished to support and armed group," Ingabire said. "This is ridiculous, how can someone be charged for having a wish?"
Evidence brought by the prosecution was "contradictory", she added.
Ingabire's defence team has also appealed against the original verdict and is seeking a full acquitall in the ongoing appeal proceedings.
Ingabire is the leader of the Unified Democratic Forces, an opposition group not recognised as a political party in Rwanda.
She is said to have made remarks in January 2010 denying genocide at a memorial in the capital Kigali to the estimated 800,000 people, the majority of them Tutsis, who were killed in Rwanda's 1994 slaughter.
Ingabire, herself a Hutu, said it was time Hutu war victims were also commemorated.
She was in the Netherlands when the genocide broke out but returned to challenge President Paul Kagame in 2010 elections, although her party was not granted registration to take part.
Kagame was re-elected with 93 percent of the vote.
str-pjm/mfp
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/130417/jailed-rwandan-politician-slams-ridiculous-case-appeal

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute