Skip to main content

DRC: M23 to “counter attack” the intervention brigade of the UN - Jambonews, news about the African Great Lakes (Rwanda, Burundi, DRC (Congo), Uganda, Kenya & Tanzania)


DRC: M23 to "counter attack" the intervention brigade of the UN

 
Apr 14th, 2013 | By  | Category: Top news

Vianney Kazarama , the military spokesman of the rebel group M23 in eastern DRC, says the military movement has granted itself the right "to respond" when attacked by the United Nations' brand-new intervention brigade created last March 28th.

Kazarama told AFP that although M23 has no right to attack the latest expansion of the UN Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUSCO), he and his men reserved the right to "respond" and " defend" themselves. He added that the consequences of such a battle would not be attributed to his military movement.

"The Kinshasa government and the Security Council of the United Nations will be held responsible for everyone who becomes displaced and all the disasters that will occur because of the deployment of the brigade," he said.

Earlier, the military group denounced the creation of the brigade by the Security Council by stating that the UN was choosing for ''the option of war" instead of "encouraging a political solution".

"Now, the forces of the peace organ [The United Nations] will fight citizen groups that demand good governance  in our country" declared Bertrand Bisimwa, the movement's political President.

M23 has been terrorizing the eastern part of the DRC since its creation in April 2012, leading up to the take-over of the regional capital city of Goma in November 2012. MONUSCO has been heavily criticized for its lack of an offensive mandate that prevented UN peacekeepers from drawing unless they were attacked themselves.   The long-awaited approval came on last March 28th, when the mission was strengthened by more than 3000 peacekeepers in order to "neutralize the armed groups,  including the M23, the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), the Allied Democratic Forces, the Alliance of Patriots for a free and sovereign Congo (APCLS), the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) and the Mayi-Mayi."

Jane Nishimwe

Jambonews.net

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Leave a Comment

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute