Skip to main content

Hutu phobia, Salma Kikwete and Kagame's propaganda


Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Hutu phobia, Salma Kikwete and Kagame's propaganda

According to one of the vilest ideologies: Hutus suffer from a genetic disorder. Their descendants inherit the genocide gene and they transmit it over to their non-Rwandan spouses through marriage. This is true if one is to believe the "scientists" in Kigali. President Kikwete of Tanzania has thus gained the gene from his wife, Salma, who they now accuse of being Hutu. According to them, it is a crime to be Hutu. That the Hutu constitute the majority in Rwanda does not seem to register in their minds.

This near-hysterical character assassination began after Kikwete's suggestion that Rwanda should talk to its armed rivals. While Kikwete made it clear that this was his personal opinion, the Kagame regime went into a rabid attack mode--sparing no insults. At first, there was a short-lived campaign to claim that Kikwete was of Hutu ancestry. Now that this hasn't worked, his wife seems to have become the perfect victim. Kagame happily plays the protagonist role.

But why waste time attacking the wife of a head of a state? If this is any indication, the Rwandan PR does tend to sink too low. I remember Barack Obama during the election cycle urging his opponents to stay clear from his family. It really does not augur well to go after the wife of a man that you deem your enemy. It is the epitome of cowardice and weakness.

"I will wait for you in a corner and hit you," Kagame lashed at Kikwete a few months ago. Rwandan bloggers have (I believe rightly so) urged Kikwete to take Kagame's threats seriously. After all, this is a leader who is described by some of his Tutsi tribesmen as a "serial killer." The blogs want to remind Kikwete that this is the same guy who is responsible for at least the deaths of four heads of state within the last two decades. They count Melchior Ndadaye (Burundi), Juvenal Habyarimana (Rwanda), Cyprien Ntaryamira (Burundi) and Laurent Kabila (DRC) among his victims. His blood for "presidential blood" has not quenched, they claim.

Back to the rumors. Is Salma Kikwete Hutu? When I mentioned to my friend about this rumor, his answer was "I wish God would turn that into truth." We live at a time when Hutu lives have lost any value. Read the latest reports by Human Rights Watch and you realize the level of slaughter going on in the Congo against Hutus directed by the Rwanda supported M23 rebels. The carnage is beyond despicable. And why wouldn't anyone wish for a biblical Esther to stop it?

That said, the attacks against Salma appear well coordinated. The rumors were first spread by Rwanda's journalist for hire, Andrew Mwenda through his Twitter. They were recirculated by the Kagame Twitter corps--a fanatic but well paid group whose only task is to tweet and retweet Rwandan propaganda. Within minutes, Kikwete was trending. As one Kagame loyalist tweeted: "Rwanda's are unrelenting when they make you an enemy."

While the campaign's sole goal is to silence Kikwete, the irony is that Kikwete has been largely mute. He has refrained from answering back to Rwanda and has maintained unprecedented restrain.

The cable that fanatically spreads the "news" does not ponder to notice the irony. Why would it be a problem (even if it were true) if Salma is indeed Hutu? She is not a Tanzanian head of state and Kikwete has every right to choose who he desires for a wife. This is strictly personal business that we have no permission to poke our noses into. Here is another similar case: many Rwandans know quite well that the leader of Interahamwe, Robert Kajuga, was Janet Kagame's guardian. Should we then associate Kagame's wife with Interahamwe?

While rumors have always been the main instrument for Rwandan politics, they appear to be intentional. Their goals are always sinister. Those who are old enough remember a time when Habyarimana's wife was rumored to be Tutsi. The insinuation here was that RPF infiltrators had gained entry into Habyarimana's household. Now Kagame's propagandists shamelessly repeat similar garbage.

Me thinks there must be something more important to do in Kigali than to make all kinds of rumors about someone's wife. As some Rwandan bloggers have wisely suggested, let's focus on ending malnutrition, which affects sixty percent of Rwandan children

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute