Pages

Saturday, 26 April 2014

[AfricaWatch] Why did Tufts give a platform to a dictator?

 


Op-Ed | Why did Tufts give a platform to a dictator?

By Alex Gladstein

Published: Thursday, April 24, 2014

Updated: Thursday, April 24, 2014

On Tuesday April 22, Tufts University gave a very warm welcome to Rwandan President Paul Kagame. Fletcher Dean Stavridis and President Monaco told a packed Cabot Auditorium audience that they were "thrilled" and "honored" to have His Excellency on campus to discuss Rwanda's road to recovery 20 years after the horrific Tutsi genocide. On an official event webpage, Kagame was described as Rwanda's first democratically-elected president, a United Nations leader and a statesman setting his country on a course of "reconciliation, nation building and socioeconomic development."

After a 20-minute lecture by Kagame, Tufts officials posed three pre-selected questions, and he was able to answer four more from the audience. It was, by any measure, a wonderful event for the Rwandan leader, who had ample time to tout his achievements with regard to economic growth, private investment, ethnic harmony and the cleanliness, efficiency and stability of his country's cities. When finished, he received a standing ovation, and Dean Stavridis thanked him amid photo-ops for a "candid and wonderful" conversation. Tufts' public relations office released a statement saying that the university was "pleased that the event was well-attended and the audience fully engaged."

The question is: how many of the organizers or audience members knew that Paul Kagame is a murderous dictator? Before you turn away in disbelief, consider the following facts.

Despite Tufts officials' claims, Kagame is no democrat. He won his first election in 2003 with 95 percent of the vote, in a contest where critics said the opposition was "virtually excluded from campaigning." During his second election in 2010, Kagame jailed political rivals and shuttered critical newspapers en route to winning 93 percent of the vote. As The Guardian observed, "opposition groups have been excluded, journalists have been intimidated and dissenting voices have been silenced, sometimes violently." A former party official in exile was shot in the stomach after voicing criticism of Kagame. Meanwhile, a critical journalist was killed, and a deputy leader of an opposition party was found beheaded. One opponent, Victoire Ingabire, was arrested soon after launching her campaign. She is still in prison today.

Once Rwanda's liberator, Kagame has spent two decades building a harsh authoritarian regime, working hard to consolidate power and extinguish dissenting voices. He operates a police state using the national army and his political party, the Rwandan Patriotic Front. According to Susan Thomson, a Rwanda expert at Colgate University, "The RPF saturates every aspect of life in Rwanda ... they know everything: if you've been drinking, if you've had an affair, if you've paid your taxes." Reporters Without Borders calls Kagame a "predator of the press," while Human Rights Watch has observed "a long-established pattern of assassination and attempted assassination of Rwandan government critics." Freedom House designates Rwanda with its lowest freedom ranking, on par with Iran and Zimbabwe and worse than Burma and Russia.

After taking power, Kagame orchestrated massacres of Hutus in Rwanda and in neighboring countries. In a vivid recent report The Wall Street Journal describes how, in the chaos after the 1994 genocide, Kagame's army "conducted its own mass slaughters across Rwanda, rounding up unarmed Hutu civilians by the thousands and machine-gunning them." In 1996, Kagame started a war with neighboring Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The International Rescue Committee estimates that more than five million people have died as a result of this military campaign. I'll repeat: five million people.

Remember Tufts' official campus statement about Kagame being a U.N. leader? Well, a U.N. investigation found that his army and allies "killed tens of thousands of innocent refugees" in the Congolese jungles, while pillaging a fortune in gold and other precious metals. According to a 545-page report, "the majority of the victims were children, women, elderly people and the sick, who were often undernourished and posed no threat to the attacking forces." Columbia University professor Howard French claims that Kagame's campaigns against Rwandan and Congolese Hutu have killed as many as 300,000 people.

In 2012 the head of the U.S. war crimes office warned Kagame that he could face prosecution at the International Criminal Court for arming rebel groups in the Congo. Again, an official in the Obama administration has suggested that Kagame has committed war crimes. The U.N. has also presented detailed evidence that Kagame was financing M23, a particularly notorious death squad founded by Bosco Ntaganda. Nicknamed "The Terminator", Ntaganda is a warlord on trial in The Hague, where witnesses testified that he personally used child soldiers and ordered troops to rape and kill civilians.

Despite all of the widely-available evidence, President Kagame did not have to face a single question at Tufts' April 22 event about human rights, attacks on dissidents, massacres or his support for armed groups. To the great disgrace of Tufts alumni, parents, donors and current students, the administration chose to genuflect before a man who should have been taken to task. 

When Columbia University hosted Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the school as an institution made it categorically clear that the Iranian leader was there to be heard in the spirit of a lively debate that did not exist inside the dictatorship of Iran, and the school's president sharply challenged Ahmadinejad on the controversial human rights issues. Despite the fact that Kagame stands accused of a much larger number of deaths than Ahmadinejad, Tufts made no such statement. Instead, anyone in the audience at Cabot would have had to figure out Kagame's crimes on their own, given that pre-event materials portrayed him as a democratic hero.

The burden for holding Kagame accountable was to be shouldered by two students, both who had the courage to criticize a powerful world leader, face to face. One, a Tufts undergraduate, challenged Kagame on the Rwandan educational system, where teachers have been arrested for not following the "official" government version of the genocide which downplays the deaths of tens of thousands of Hutus. Another, a Fletcher student, asked what Kagame had to say about rumors of him running for a third term, which would violate the Rwandan constitution. Kagame quickly brushed off the first accusation as a media fabrication, and charmed the audience by laughing off the second question, along with the moderators and everyone else in the room.

Of course, it is likely that Kagame would have never agreed to come to Tufts if the agreement had included focused criticism on his human rights abuses. In an attempt to bring big issues and big global players to campus, Tufts officials instead made an intellectual sacrifice and allowed a dictator to be whitewashed. The result was a terrific opportunity for Kagame to gain international credibility at a highly-respected institution in a format he knew he could control and spin for a positive outcome. 

Filip Reyntjens, a Rwanda expert and professor of African Law and Politics at the University of Antwerp, has stated that "there is overwhelming evidence of responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity" against Kagame. In a 2013 interview, Reyntjens said that Kagame's crimes "rank with those perpetrated by former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein or Sudanese leader Omar al-Bashir." For all his "vision and ambition," he said, Kagame is "probably the worst war criminal in office today."

And yet, this man was presented to the Tufts student body as a role model. For that, the president and trustees of Tufts owe the campus community a detailed explanation.

Comments

Mutuyimana Manzi
Fri Apr 25 2014 17:34
To you Rwandan, can you provide at a least a single line in the constitution drafted by Reytjens where there is mono-ethnicity as you are allegedly claiming? Reytjens is among scholars who have been proving the dictatorial nature of regimes that ahave been ruling Rwanda, including habyarimana's. It's because of the criticism of scholars like Reytjens that Habyarimana accepted political pluralism and to sign peace agreement with RPF. RPF and Kagame made advantage of that truce of peace agreement to assassinate Habyarimana and consequently trigger the genocide in their prusuit of absolute mono-ethnic power. In the process of that pursuit of absolute power, Kagame and RPF committed grave crimes inside Rwanda and Congo, inter alia, the genocide against Hutus. Because of that criminal background, RPF and Kagame failed to secure support of Rwandans. Hence, RPF has to resort on propaganda and always exploit the genocide against Tutsi as a smokescreen, whilst suppressing freedom of speech in Rwanda and blocking independent research to figure out wether the economic development in Rwanda is a reality. So Mr or Ms Rwandan, I am also a Rwandan and you cannot lie about facts of Rwanda.
Mutuyimana Manzi
Fri Apr 25 2014 17:05
Some individuals want to mislead the world that Kagame and RPF mean Rwanda and all Rwandans. When you well-foundedly prove how Kagame and RPF committed and are still committing heinous crimes, exactions, atrocities, etc; those Kagame's supporters try to dismiss you with blury alibis by alleging that you are against Rwanda and Rwandans. The fact is that Rwandans don't like RPF and Kagame. Kagame is aware of that. That's why RPF and Kagame always resort to election frauds, political oppression, ethnic discrimination, summary executions, assassinations, arbitrary detention, regime of terror and genocidal mass killings in order to hold grip on power.
Aisha M
Fri Apr 25 2014 17:04
Dear Alex Gladstein,

Your criticism is one-sided and My problem is with your source. I have no problem with those journals you mention. My problem is who they (and you) choose reference (e.g.: Filip Reyntjens).

Filip Reyntjens, whose brainchild- a mono-ethnic constitution in pre-genocide Rwanda- is the foundation of the extremism that fueled the 1994 genocide against Tutsi in Rwanda, is nothing much than a hater of Rwanda. Please read his bio online for your reference. Using him as a reference attests to the fact that you either hate Rwanda too or are ignorant about the history of the country.

Rwanda is making progress of all sorts, and whoever chooses to side with us will seek the truth as we continue in our pursuit of development.

Alexander Gladstein
Fri Apr 25 2014 12:39
Dear Rwandan: Given that Tufts officials thought it was a good idea to present President Kagame in a 100% positive light, what I tried to do here was lay out a sampling of the wide variety of criticism against him. If you have a problem with the facts coming from sources like the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Reporters Without Borders, The Guardian, and The Wall Street Journal, I suggest you take it up with them.
Aisha M
Fri Apr 25 2014 12:26
Akaliza, I am sorry but I think you should not speak for all Rwandans. I am a Rwandan too, went to school there, and I do not think Rwandans are suffering. Rwanda like any other country has problems, and I think the country is doing its best to solve them. Plus have you ever heard of the french saying "les linges sales se lavent en famille"? This is not the platform to come accuse your Rwandan leaders if you really want to things things changed in Rwanda.
Aisha M
Fri Apr 25 2014 11:56
Akaliza, I am sorry but I think you should not speak for all Rwandans. I am a Rwandan too, went to school there, and I do not think Rwandans are suffering. Rwanda like any other country has problems, and I think the country is doing its best to solve them. Plus have you ever heard of the french saying "les linges sales se lavent en famille"? This is not the platform to come accuse your Rwandan leaders if you really want to things things changed in Rwanda.
F K
Fri Apr 25 2014 06:54
Modernity is nothing if Rwandan are suffering and it is what is happening right now
Rwanda is safe country for foreigners and not for native people, this is unacceptable !!
Kagame is a tyran and soon or later he will face the ICTR
Kagame should not get such platform where he comes to make his propaganda
Aisha M
Fri Apr 25 2014 01:09
Dear Alex Gladstein,

To reply to your essay, I would like to start with a few questions. Have you ever been to Rwanda? Or at least do you know how far Rwanda has come? For your information, Rwanda is flourishing, and believe it or not, it is thanks to its leaders with President Kagame at the forefront. Development in Rwanda speaks for itself, and I am glad you mention it in your essay. Tufts -like many other great universities that have hosted Rwandan leaders- has chosen to be a partner in the success story that Rwanda is writing.

As it is clear in your piece of writing, you appear to be a heated critic of President Kagame, but just as obvious, you fail to provide compelling evidence of the pure lies you tell about him. What turns off your whole essay as much is who you choose to call Rwanda experts: Susan Thomson and Filip Reyntjens, two individuals who from the onset have chosen to take a negative stance on Rwanda.

Before you reference any such experts, you should first let the voices of Rwandans be heard. Could you for a moment let the story of Rwanda be told by Rwandans themselves? There are many (and I am a living example of them) who have lived through it all in Rwanda and can tell you the difference the current leadership of Rwanda has made in their lives. Now, as a Rwandan, who grew up and spent a great portion of my life in Rwanda, I really can't put up with the so-called expert on Rwanda because all their descriptions of Rwanda (and yours today) just sound to be driven by ill intentions.

Rwanda has come a long way, and the country is determined in reaching an even brighter future. If only you and others like you could give Rwanda the space to do so. The United States of America didn't become the "democratic" country it claims to be today overnight. It took approximately 170 years between the constitution adoption (1787) and the universal suffrage in the USA (1954). 20 years after the1994 genocide against Tutsi and with all the great achievements in its reconstruction thus far, it stands to reason that Tufts chose to ignore uninformed comments about Kagame.

Rwanda has already made great strides- that's what attracts universities like Tufts, MIT and other partners. If only you could visit to see/experience first-hand what is truly happening and stop this one-sided propaganda against a country that has steadily risen from the ashes of genocide.

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.
More News:http://changingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaWatch@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaWatch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaWatch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaWatch-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.

Sponsors:
http://www.datingwithoutborders.com
http://www.eyumbina.com
http://www.foraha.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Online Scholarships for Higher Education And Research (OSHEAR): http://www.oshear.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

Popular Posts

“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.

“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

“When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.”