Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] Re: [MigrantCause.com] Rubbish Ed Miliband was heavily defeated because of lack of understanding of many economic and social issues

 

Ed Milband could have made a difference if he had attacked David Cameron 's political discrimination against Scottish People and SNP.
 
Ed Miliband could have made a difference if he had explained what  his exclusive and discriminatory " working people" slogan means to ordinary people, unemployed people, over 50s people, students, disabled people and ethnic minority people.




On Sunday, 10 May 2015, 15:27, "FAIRER SOCIETY fairersociety@yahoo.com [MigrantCause]" <MigrantCause@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Rubbish  Ed Miliband was heavily defeated because of lack of understanding of many economic and socal issues:
 
·      Did Ed Miliband  not see that nationalism applies to both in Scotland and England. Did warn voters about this trend that contributed to his defeat  instead of focusing on SNP?
·      Does he really understand inequality and poverty issues in the developed world ?
·      Has he never met  people who are struggling to pay rents  which has consistently increased for the last 3 years?
·      Does he know the poor quality of housing in the UK ( both private and social housing) and that ethnic minority and disadvantaged people are the ones who rent or are offered  houses of poor quality?
·      Has he never met over 50 years old people who are struggling to get a job because of discrimination based on old age ?
·      Did he really say enough about food bank, fuel poverty, malnutrition  and child poverty ?
·      Does he understand that  fuel poverty,malnutrition and poor diet contribute to putting more pressure on NHS services?
·      Did he say enough about poor education in public schools and that children from rich families are likely to do better at school than children from families of low incomes?
·      Did he really say enough about low-wages, for example where carers  ( many of them from migrants and BME communities ) who wash and feed older people are paid only £6/hours?
 

On Saturday, 9 May 2015, 15:42, "FAIRER SOCIETY fairersociety@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities]" <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Why was the Labour Party heavily defeated in the General Elections?
 
In 10 points, the Labour Party was defeated because:
 
1. The Labour Party does not listen to its members. No comments or suggestions from a party member is recognised or responded to. The Labour Party is an arrogant Party.
 
2. The Party failed to  explain  the critics against it, especially in relation to economic performance which was largely influenced by the global economic crisis.
 
3. The  strategy of 'working families" did not work for the families. This strategy seems to suggest that Labour Party does not care about  ethnic minority people, disadvantaged people, unemployed people , older and  disabled  people  who  can't work because of various reasons including disability and discrimination. The impact of Cameron 's austerity was lacking in the  Labour Party's campaign.
 
4. The Party campaigned a lot about NHS as an institution rather than campaigning about the people that institution serves.
 
5. The reduction of university tuition fees was not included the  Labours' promises  carved in stone.
 
6. The Party was involved in  humiliating, discrimination and arrogance campaign against the Scottish People, especially the SNP.
 
7. There was no difference between  the Conservatives' Policies and Labour's Policies about immigration and the economy. Ending austerity was not clearly outlined as one of the Labour's  Policies.
 
8. The SNP has been  accused of being 'nationalist ' by Ed Miliband. However, this election shows that Ed Miliband's defeat was caused by the rise of 'nationalism' in England. Ed Miliband failed to  fight  against this  trend.
 
9. Women were absent in Labour  Party Campaign ( including the Deputy Leader).
 
10. Labour Campaign  was an 'elite' campaign that did not  engage with grassroots activists, unemployed people, people on zero-hour contracts, the disadvantaged and working people.





__._,_.___

Posted by: FAIRER SOCIETY <fairersociety@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute