Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] Re: [MigrantCause.com] Rubbish Ed Miliband was heavily defeated because of lack of understanding of many economic and social issues

 

Ed Milband could have made a difference if he had attacked David Cameron 's political discrimination against Scottish People and SNP.
 
Ed Miliband could have made a difference if he had explained what  his exclusive and discriminatory " working people" slogan means to ordinary people, unemployed people, over 50s people, students, disabled people and ethnic minority people.




On Sunday, 10 May 2015, 15:27, "FAIRER SOCIETY fairersociety@yahoo.com [MigrantCause]" <MigrantCause@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Rubbish  Ed Miliband was heavily defeated because of lack of understanding of many economic and socal issues:
 
·      Did Ed Miliband  not see that nationalism applies to both in Scotland and England. Did warn voters about this trend that contributed to his defeat  instead of focusing on SNP?
·      Does he really understand inequality and poverty issues in the developed world ?
·      Has he never met  people who are struggling to pay rents  which has consistently increased for the last 3 years?
·      Does he know the poor quality of housing in the UK ( both private and social housing) and that ethnic minority and disadvantaged people are the ones who rent or are offered  houses of poor quality?
·      Has he never met over 50 years old people who are struggling to get a job because of discrimination based on old age ?
·      Did he really say enough about food bank, fuel poverty, malnutrition  and child poverty ?
·      Does he understand that  fuel poverty,malnutrition and poor diet contribute to putting more pressure on NHS services?
·      Did he say enough about poor education in public schools and that children from rich families are likely to do better at school than children from families of low incomes?
·      Did he really say enough about low-wages, for example where carers  ( many of them from migrants and BME communities ) who wash and feed older people are paid only £6/hours?
 

On Saturday, 9 May 2015, 15:42, "FAIRER SOCIETY fairersociety@yahoo.com [AfricaRealities]" <AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
Why was the Labour Party heavily defeated in the General Elections?
 
In 10 points, the Labour Party was defeated because:
 
1. The Labour Party does not listen to its members. No comments or suggestions from a party member is recognised or responded to. The Labour Party is an arrogant Party.
 
2. The Party failed to  explain  the critics against it, especially in relation to economic performance which was largely influenced by the global economic crisis.
 
3. The  strategy of 'working families" did not work for the families. This strategy seems to suggest that Labour Party does not care about  ethnic minority people, disadvantaged people, unemployed people , older and  disabled  people  who  can't work because of various reasons including disability and discrimination. The impact of Cameron 's austerity was lacking in the  Labour Party's campaign.
 
4. The Party campaigned a lot about NHS as an institution rather than campaigning about the people that institution serves.
 
5. The reduction of university tuition fees was not included the  Labours' promises  carved in stone.
 
6. The Party was involved in  humiliating, discrimination and arrogance campaign against the Scottish People, especially the SNP.
 
7. There was no difference between  the Conservatives' Policies and Labour's Policies about immigration and the economy. Ending austerity was not clearly outlined as one of the Labour's  Policies.
 
8. The SNP has been  accused of being 'nationalist ' by Ed Miliband. However, this election shows that Ed Miliband's defeat was caused by the rise of 'nationalism' in England. Ed Miliband failed to  fight  against this  trend.
 
9. Women were absent in Labour  Party Campaign ( including the Deputy Leader).
 
10. Labour Campaign  was an 'elite' campaign that did not  engage with grassroots activists, unemployed people, people on zero-hour contracts, the disadvantaged and working people.





__._,_.___

Posted by: FAIRER SOCIETY <fairersociety@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute