Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] Fw: *DHR* Karenzi Karake Case: President Kagame Won The Battle But Lost The War | by David Himbara 

 




On Tuesday, 11 August 2015, 8:42, "itwagira71 itwagira71@gmail.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr> wrote:


 

General Karenzi Karake Case: President Kagame Won The Battle But Lost The War | David Himbara 





General Karenzi Karake Case: President Kagame Won The Battle But Lost The War

Himbara
August 11, 2015 04:53  Analysis
The term "winning the battle but losing the war" refers to when someone is so concentrated into something he thought was so immense, but at the end realises the achievement is so tiny compared to the big picture that he lost.
By freeing Karenzi…., Kagame has won the battle. Karake goes home, Kagame's hired hands in Britain get paid, and Kagame claims victory over what he nowadays calls "neocolonial" European imperialists that seek to humiliate Africans.
But here is how Kagame lost the real war:
1. This case proved to any doubters that Kagame is no presidential material. He went overboard with his style of public shaming, abusing just about everybody he imagined was responsible for Karenzi arrest. In Kagame's abusive world everybody, every country, every world institution must obey him – the leader and his beliefs. Anyone who dares go against the leader's authority is publicly shamed for their actions. Then they are cut off and treated as outcasts and shunned. According to Kagame, Britain and Europeans are "rubbish" and any Rwandans involved in this are "petty criminals and thugs." And Kagame was uttering these things of all places in the law-making institution – parliament, with chief justice, speaker, and cabinet in attendance.
2. Kagame assumed that his totalitarian system applies everywhere in the world, leading him to mistakenly attack the British government for their "politically-motivated" arrest of Karenzi. In Rwanda's totalitarian state the supreme power is concentrated in the hands of one person – Kagame himself. His decisions are not subject to legal parliamentarian or judicial restraints. Kagame is pretty well an absolute monarchy. Separation powers and areas of responsibility into a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary is therefore an alien concept to Kagame. To Kagame the government of Prime Minister David Cameron, arrested Karake and has just freed him.
3. Kagame previously believed he was invincible, but he is discovering the reality of overstaying in power. Previously Kagame would do no wrong, a Global elite's favourite strongman who has modernised Rwanda. But the emperor is naked. The world is now seeing Kagame for what he is – a dictator that is masterminding power grab in 2017 via "popular demand" whereby his docile rubber stamping parliament just voted by 99% to support this political madness in broad daylight. Meanwhile, as we speak, Kagame's modernization shambles is in the open for all to see. Hardly any Rwandan is currently not affected by lack of water and electricity crisis – this in a country in which 86% depend on biomass for enery, 11% on petroleum and 4% on electricity.
Now, to fellow Rwandans, human rights activists, and friends. Keep your heads up. We are believers in and advocates of the rule of law. By freeing Karake, the British judge is not saying that Karake is innocent of atrocities he is said to have committed. No. The judge's decision is strictly contextualised by the Spanish demands for Karake extradition to face trial there. If this request is undermined in anyway, that is the end of only round one. We now await for future rounds. That is for sure – remember even Kagame had to be saved by the Obama Administration from a lawsuit by applying for immunity as long as Kagame remains in office.
The struggle continues.
Dr David Himbara




http://www.therwandan.com/blog/general-karenzi-karake-case-president-kagame-won-the-battle-but-lost-the-war/

Envoyé depuis mon appareil Samsung


__._,_.___

Posted by: Afrika Watch <afrikawatch@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.africanaffection.com
http://www.datinginafrica.com/
http://www.foraha.net
https://www.facebook.com/onlinedatinginafrica

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute