Pages

Tuesday, 15 December 2020

UK plan not to fully participate in Erasmus+ programme is a deliberate discrimination against Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Organisations ( BAME).

UK plan not to fully participate in Erasmus+ programme is a deliberate discrimination against Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Organisations ( BAME).

Erasmus+ programme was accessible by UK small  BAME organisations, NGOs, social enterprises and charities, particularly in relation to inclusion. If UK  leaves Erasmus+ programme, and launches a similar programme ( UK Erasmus+),  BAME  organisations will  not have access to this new UK programme. It is well known that UK funding programmes do not have  strong criteria in relation to diversity, equality and inclusion. The UK organisations which  have money ( reserves)  and led by the white  are the ones who gets funding money.

Even if UK decides to participate in EU Erasmus+ programmes,  the programme actions that involve BAME organisations and other small organisations working with young people with fewer opportunities will be excluded.  The UK government prefers to participate in Erasmus+ Programmes  that are dominated by the UK white class. This is another example of  deliberate discrimination against BAME organisations being planned by the UK government.

UK BAME organisations face discrimination in all funding programmes.  They will  not have access to the new UK funding   similar to Erasmus+ programme  ( being designed by the  Tory Administration). This new funding will  be more accessible to larger white-led organisations as it is the case regarding International Development Funding Programmes run by the UK government  and dominated by  UK NGOs working in Africa and other developing regions.

More:

UK set to lose access to Erasmus exchange programme as Brexit talks struggle

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-erasmus-eu-exchange-b1774348.html

Funding pledge for UK substitute to Erasmus+ welcomed

Funding pledge for UK substitute to Erasmus+ welcomed


UK unlikely to participate in Erasmus+ post Brexit

Michel Barnier tells MEPs negotiators have not struck a deal on UK participation in the EU scheme.


Thursday, 26 November 2020

Analyse: Comment les erreurs politiques des Burundais les trahissent ( en quatre points) ?

Comment les erreurs politiques des Burundais les trahissent  ( en quatre points) ?

 

1. Les Burundais ne comprennent rien de la justice. L'impunité règne au Burundi  depuis des décennies car les Hutu ont peur des Tutsi  même après la prise du pouvoir  par des Hutus. Cette impunité est soutenue par tous les colons belges et francais.

 

2. En Côte d'Ivoire il y a  eu le changement de la constitution et le président  sortant s'est représenté et été élu.  Il n'y a pas  eu  d'exode des refugiés et des massacres comme au Burundi. Les colons français ont encouragé le  changement de la constituions en Cote d'Ivoire. Mais au Burundi cela n'a pas été le cas. Les colons belges et français ainsi que les tutsi  du Rwanda et du  Burundi ont  encouragé les violences et Kagame a appelé les burundais d'aller se réfugier au Rwanda.

 

3. Le Burundi a fait une autre erreur grave. Celle de ne pas  avoir adopté l'Anglais et supprimé le  Français alors que la majorité des refugies étaient  des refugiés en Tanzanie, un pays anglophone. Si  le Burundi avait supprimé le français ( la langue des génocidaires selon  Kagame), le Burundi serait aujourd'hui en paix, en train d'être courtisé par les colons français qui  courtisent Kagame.

 

4. Les Burundais n'ont pas pu se débarrasser des Accords d'Arusha comme le Rwanda l'a fait. Si  le Rwanda avait mis en œuvre les accords d'Arusha il serait dans le même serait aujourd'hui dans la même situation que le Burundi. Au Rwanda le pouvoir est 100 % entre les mains des Tutsi qui écrasent toute personne qui s'oppose au régime.


Friday, 20 November 2020

Les dépenses de la secrétaire générale demeurent cachées


Les dépenses de la secrétaire générale demeurent cachées

L'Organisation internationale de la francophonie toujours aussi opaque

  • 45
  •  
  • AUTRES
Periode des questions
PHOTO D'ARCHIVESL'actuelle secrétaire générale de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo, lors de son passage à l'Assemblée nationale en juin 2019.
Vendredi, 20 novembre 2020 01:00MISE À JOUR Vendredi, 20 novembre 2020 01:00

QUÉBEC | L'opacité continue à l'Organisation internationale de la francophonie (OIF), où des rapports de dépenses et d'audit demeurent cachés, ce qui est contraire aux règles de transparence adoptées après la controverse entourant la gestion de son ex-secrétaire générale Michaëlle Jean.

• À lire aussi: Voitures de fonction malgré des congédiements à la Francophonie

Une politique adoptée en 2018 par les États et gouvernements membres de l'OIF oblige la divulgation de plusieurs documents, dont des rapports de vérification externe et interne ainsi que les dépenses du cabinet de l'actuelle secrétaire générale, Louise Mushikiwabo.

Dès le début du mandat de Mme Mushikiwabo, l'organisation a publié plusieurs documents, comme l'exigeaient les nouvelles règles.

La rémunération de base de la secrétaire générale, soit 275 000 $, a ainsi été rendue publique pour la première fois sur le site internet de l'OIF, en 2019. Les états financiers de 2018, dernier exercice de Mme Jean, ont également été publiés.

Aucune trace cependant des rapports annuels du vérificateur externe ou de l'auditeur interne, tant pour la dernière année complétée, 2019, que pour les précédentes. Les constats dressés dans ces documents ont parfois été embarrassants, dans le passé, pour les dirigeants.

Désaccords

Avant de quitter précipitamment ses fonctions en octobre, l'ex-administratrice Catherine Cano a pourtant affirmé, lors d'un passage à Montréal, que l'auditeur externe avait certifié les états financiers de l'année 2019.

Mme Cano avait fait état d'un redressement des finances de l'OIF, après deux années de déficits consécutifs totalisant 7 millions $. 

L'administratrice, qui selon l'OIF aurait démissionné en raison de « désaccords », a dû resserrer les dépenses, notamment pour les déplacements.

Silence

Oria Vande Weghe, porte-parole de Mme Mushikiwabo, a refusé de donner suite aux demandes de notre Bureau d'enquête pour obtenir les plus récents documents.

« Nous préférons [...] vous référer à notre site internet où toutes nos activités sont relayées, et ce, dans la plus grande transparence », a-t-elle répondu.

Un examen méticuleux des documents disponibles révèle toutefois l'absence des rapports de vérification et d'audit. 

Les dépenses du cabinet de Mme Mushikiwabo sont également introuvables.

En 2017, Mme Jean, ex-gouverneure générale du Canada, s'est retrouvée au centre d'une controverse en raison des dépenses d'un demi-million de dollars pour l'aménagement de son appartement de fonction et de la hausse de ses frais de déplacement.


Le cabinet de la secrétaire générale, Louise Mushikiwabo, a refusé nos demandes de documents.

Les dépenses de la secrétaire générale demeurent cachées






Les dépenses de la secrétaire générale demeurent cachées

 

Les dépenses de la secrétaire générale demeurent cachées

L’Organisation internationale de la francophonie toujours aussi opaque

Periode des questions
PHOTO D'ARCHIVESL’actuelle secrétaire générale de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo, lors de son passage à l’Assemblée nationale en juin 2019.

QUÉBEC | L’opacité continue à l’Organisation internationale de la francophonie (OIF), où des rapports de dépenses et d’audit demeurent cachés, ce qui est contraire aux règles de transparence adoptées après la controverse entourant la gestion de son ex-secrétaire générale Michaëlle Jean.

• À lire aussi: Voitures de fonction malgré des congédiements à la Francophonie

Une politique adoptée en 2018 par les États et gouvernements membres de l’OIF oblige la divulgation de plusieurs documents, dont des rapports de vérification externe et interne ainsi que les dépenses du cabinet de l’actuelle secrétaire générale, Louise Mushikiwabo.

Dès le début du mandat de Mme Mushikiwabo, l’organisation a publié plusieurs documents, comme l’exigeaient les nouvelles règles.

La rémunération de base de la secrétaire générale, soit 275 000 $, a ainsi été rendue publique pour la première fois sur le site internet de l’OIF, en 2019. Les états financiers de 2018, dernier exercice de Mme Jean, ont également été publiés.

Aucune trace cependant des rapports annuels du vérificateur externe ou de l’auditeur interne, tant pour la dernière année complétée, 2019, que pour les précédentes. Les constats dressés dans ces documents ont parfois été embarrassants, dans le passé, pour les dirigeants.

Désaccords

Avant de quitter précipitamment ses fonctions en octobre, l’ex-administratrice Catherine Cano a pourtant affirmé, lors d’un passage à Montréal, que l’auditeur externe avait certifié les états financiers de l’année 2019.

Mme Cano avait fait état d’un redressement des finances de l’OIF, après deux années de déficits consécutifs totalisant 7 millions $. 

L’administratrice, qui selon l’OIF aurait démissionné en raison de « désaccords », a dû resserrer les dépenses, notamment pour les déplacements.

Silence

Oria Vande Weghe, porte-parole de Mme Mushikiwabo, a refusé de donner suite aux demandes de notre Bureau d’enquête pour obtenir les plus récents documents.

« Nous préférons [...] vous référer à notre site internet où toutes nos activités sont relayées, et ce, dans la plus grande transparence », a-t-elle répondu.

Un examen méticuleux des documents disponibles révèle toutefois l’absence des rapports de vérification et d’audit. 

Les dépenses du cabinet de Mme Mushikiwabo sont également introuvables.

En 2017, Mme Jean, ex-gouverneure générale du Canada, s’est retrouvée au centre d’une controverse en raison des dépenses d’un demi-million de dollars pour l’aménagement de son appartement de fonction et de la hausse de ses frais de déplacement.


Le cabinet de la secrétaire générale, Louise Mushikiwabo, a refusé nos demandes de documents.

https://www.journaldemontreal.com/2020/11/20/les-depenses-de-la-secretaire-generale-demeurent-cachees


Thursday, 19 November 2020

Biden picks Africa specialists in transition team but policy unlikely to change

Biden picks Africa specialists in transition team but policy unlikely to change

A file photo of South Sudan President Salva Kiir (l) and then-US Vice President Joe Biden in Kenya.
A file photo of South Sudan President Salva Kiir (l) and then-US Vice President Joe Biden in Kenya. ASSOCIATED PRESS - Sayyid Azim

Although many African political experts look with renewed hope to the administration being put in place by US President-elect Joe Biden, others believe that only the tone of American policy will change towards the African continent, not the substance.

ADVERTISING

"I think that there's a general expectation globally that the Biden administration will reverse the four-year nightmare…looking for a reset in US relations on Africa, but I don't see any major change," says Sebastian Spio-Garbrah, head of Da Mina Advisors, a political risk consultancy with offices in New York.

He is referring to President Donald Trump's disdain for Africa, the discriminatory visa restrictions against Sudan, Somalia, and even Chad at one point. Trump reportedly described some African nations as "shithole" countries, and mispronounced the names of others, including Namibia and Tanzania.

"For instance, the sanctions on Zimbabwe. Is Biden going to lift them? I don't think so," adds Spio-Garbrah.

Democracy vs trade

Renewed efforts at maintaining or furthering trade ties are likely to take a back seat to issues like democracy, according to Spio-Garbrah. But the possible installation of Nigerian economist Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala as the head of the World Trade Organization would definitely push African concerns to the forefront, he says.

PUBLICITÉ

"I believe the Biden admin supports her, as Trump has not," he adds.

"Even though Africa will be part of the agenda, I would expect the focus to be largely about democracy, not about economics…and expect the Biden administration to be much more muscular in their response in terms of sanctions, going publicly against those regimes in Africa where there are bad elections," says Spio-Garbrah.

Cabinet picks

Biden is slated to name his cabinet on Tuesday, but it is already evident who he is surrounding himself with regarding the Africa agenda. One name that has been repeatedly floated – even as potential vice president – is Susan Rice, who has held a number of positions related to Africa from the Clinton administration onwards, including as policy advisor, assistant Secretary of State for Africa, former UN ambassador, and national security advisor under the Obama administration.

She is currently part of the Biden transition team, and has long had a professional relationship with him.

But she carries a lot of baggage from past handling of crises on the African continent, from Libya to Rwanda.

She has been repeatedly accused of sidling up to African leaders considered to be dictators, including Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and Rwanda's Paul Kagame.

UN watchers remember that she held back a UN report that indicated Kagame supported M23 rebel fighters in the Democratic Republic of Congo, as a way of shielding him from criticism, or even sanctions.

She also formerly worked for Kagame as an advisor.

While working as the US ambassador to the UN, the US State Department, in a rare move, distanced themselves from Rice's claim that the 2012 attack on the US embassy compound in Benghazi, Libya, which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and 3 other Americans, was a reaction to a movie that was screened earlier in the week.




"If she is named Secretary of State I believe Africa would have some importance in the general orientation of the administration," says Spio-Garbrah. "Even if she is named, the traditional needs and roles of the American government is still Europe and Asia to a degree. I do not see a major focus on Africa," he adds, weighing the geopolitical balance.

On the positive side, Biden has included retired and much-respected Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the former assistant Secretary of State for African affairs and former US ambassador to Liberia to head the Biden-Harris transition team.







Fw: *DHR* BBC-RWANDA: The loyalty oath keeping Rwandans abroad in check


 

The loyalty oath keeping Rwandans abroad in check

By Andrew Harding
Africa correspondent, BBC News

Published
2 hours ago
A screengrab of people at the Rwanda's High Commission in London pledging an oath of loyalty to the RPFIMAGE COPYRIGHTYOUTUBE
image captionThe footage, which the BBC has chosen to blur, shows members of the group promising to fight "enemies" of Rwanda

Leaked footage of a controversial "oath" ceremony at the Rwandan High Commission in London has fuelled allegations of an aggressive global crackdown on dissent by the authoritarian government of the small East African nation, dubbed the new "North Korea" by its critics.

Members of the Rwandan diaspora have told the BBC that such ceremonies are commonplace and designed to instil fear and obedience.

One man said his relatives back in Rwanda had been abducted and possibly killed to punish him for refusing to co-operate.. The Rwandan authorities have dismissed the allegations as false and unsubstantiated.

In the video footage, recently circulated on WhatsApp, more than 30 individuals can be seen standing in a crowded conference room at the Rwandan embassy in the UK, raising their hands and pledging loyalty to the governing party, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).

"If I betray you or stray from the RPF's plans and intentions, I would be betraying all Rwandans and must be punished by hanging," the group says, in Kinyarwanda, while also promising to fight "enemies of Rwanda, wherever they may be".

The RPF's use of an embassy - which in London is close to Marylebone Station - for an overtly political pledge is, in itself, noteworthy.

'They're terrified'

But, while some of those attending the ceremony - understood to have taken place in 2017 - may well have been genuine supporters of the governing party, now living abroad, others have told the BBC that many attendees were there under duress.

David Himbara
BBC
"This is what happens everywhere. It's routine. Either you take [the oath] or you are [the] enemy. It is black and white"
David Himbara
Ex-adviser to President Kagame
1px transparent line

"I am certain the majority of people taking that oath did not believe it. We were lying to protect ourselves and our families back in Rwanda," said one person who was - according to our investigation - present at the ceremony, but who asked us not to reveal their name for fear of reprisals.

"This is what happens everywhere. It's routine. Either you take [the oath] or you are [the] enemy. It is black and white," said David Himbara, who was once a senior adviser to Rwanda's President Paul Kagame.

He is a Canadian citizen, academic and activist who says his life has repeatedly been threatened by Rwanda's security services.

"The vast majority go because they're terrified. They think that if they don't go, something will happen to their family [in Rwanda]," said Rene Mugenzi, a British-Rwandan human rights activist, who was recently convicted of theft in the UK and jailed.

"You need to be active [in the RPF]. Even if you are neutral… they suspect you to be supporting opposition groups," he said.

Asked about the "oath" ceremony, the Rwandan High Commission replied, by email, that members of the diaspora used its conference room for a variety of cultural engagements and that participation in an RPF loyalty pledge was legal and "entirely of their own choice and no-one is forced to do so".

'My brothers were abducted'

But the BBC has heard new evidence that Rwanda's government has not only sought to threaten members of the diaspora seen as disloyal, but also that it seeks to punish such people by targeting their relatives still living in Rwanda.

Jean Nsengimana (L) and Antonine Zihabamwe (R)IMAGE COPYRIGHTNOEL ZIHABAMWE
image captionFamily photos of Jean Nsengimana (L) and Antonine Zihabamwe (R), who have been missing for more than a year

"In order to intimidate me, they abducted my two brothers. They were never involved in politics. They were on Rwanda soil. Why should they be paying such a heavy price for doing nothing?" asked an emotional Noel Zihabamwe, from his home in Australia.

Mr Zihabamwe is a prominent member of the Rwandan diaspora in Sydney, who came to the country as a refugee in 2006, seeking to escape what he saw as an increasingly stifling and repressive political climate.

He says his refusal to actively support the RPF government prompted a public death threat from a visiting Rwandan diplomat in late 2017, which he reported to the Australian authorities.

Noel Zihabamwe
Noel Zihabamwe
They often use this kind of kidnapping or murdering family members. This has to stop. We have had enough"
Noel Zihabamwe
A Rwandan living in Australia
1px transparent line

That was followed by the alleged abduction of his two brothers, Jean Nsengimana and Antonine Zihabamwe, who were reportedly taken off a bus by police officers near the Rwandan town of Karangazi in September 2019 and have not been seen again.

"They often use this kind of kidnapping or murdering family members. This has to stop. We have had enough," Mr Zihabamwe said.

"We would like to see the Rwandan government restore democratic rights to all citizens, cease targeted killings, kidnappings, illegal arrests and campaigns of intimidation of former citizens, like me, who are living overseas," added Mr Zihabamwe, who now believes his brothers are probably dead and has decided to speak out in public, despite what he believes are considerable risks for himself and his extended family.

"Why can't they let the family know where their bodies are, so we can organise a formal funeral? There are many Rwandans outside who have lost or missed their beloved ones.

"I want to speak against injustice. We need leadership that can stand for everyone, not for some," he told the BBC.

'No basis to allegations'

The Rwandan High Commission in London dismissed Mr Zihabamwe's allegations as "tired and recycled" falsehoods and a "cheap ploy by political detractors to get free media attention".

2px presentational grey line

You may also be interested in:

2px presentational grey line

But allegations such as these are considered credible by many researchers, human rights groups and foreign diplomats, who say the Rwandan authorities appear to have calculated that - despite provoking some criticism from Western governments - such actions, which have included several targeted assassinations abroad, never appear to result in any long-term damage to Rwanda's international relations.

The Rwandan government has received widespread global praise and financial support, over decades, for its hugely successful development agenda, which has helped to combat poverty and transformed Rwanda into one of the continent's most impressive economies.

"Their view is - we can do what we like, kill who we like," said one source, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The case of the man, feted internationally - his story was turned into the Hollywood film Hotel Rwanda - for sheltering people from the 1994 genocide, attracted global criticism earlier this year after he was spirited back to the country to face trial on terrorism charges.

The death earlier this year, in police custody, of the popular gospel singer Kizito Mihigo also stirred huge anger.

Kizito MihigoIMAGE COPYRIGHTKIZITO MIHIGO/FACEBOOK
image captionGospel singer Kizito Mihigo was found dead earlier this year, at the age of 38, in a police cell

Kizito, as he was popularly known, had tried to cross Rwanda's border illegally, the authorities said. They say he killed himself - a version which is widely disputed in the diaspora and by many analysts.

"If you're Rwandan, it's simply safer to stay silent," said Sarah Jackson, Amnesty International's deputy director for East Africa.

"The Rwandan authorities have a whole toolbox of tactics that they use to supress dissent at home and abroad, ranging from harassment to threats to illegal detention, disappearances, torture, and even extending to returning Rwandan dissidents from other countries back to Rwanda without going through extradition proceedings… and to threatening family members too."

The Rwandan High Commission in London said such allegations had no basis, and were being spread by a "handful of opponents… in order to damage the image and continued development journey of Rwanda".

'Totalitarianism'

President Kagame officially secured almost 99% of the vote in Rwanda's last presidential election in 2017.

In London, Abdulkarim Ali, an official in the opposition Rwandan National Congress, said: "Either you pay allegiance to the RPF or… you become an enemy of the state. We normally compare it to North Korea."

In Canada, Mr Himbara described the Rwandan government's ideology as one of "totalitarianism - a government that wants to control all aspects of the Rwandan people, even in the diaspora".

The Rwandan High Commission in London said the government's main focus was to lift Rwandans out of poverty and create a good quality of life and opportunities for all of them..

"The focus of the High Commission is not on a handful of opponents who consistently spread false information in order to damage the image and continued development journey of Rwanda."

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-54801979

SIBOMANA Jean Bosco. Mes Tweets sont éphémères: leur durée de vie maximale est de 24 heures. Mes albums photos sont archivés sur Google Photos. Visit links section on my FACEBOOK: Https://www.facebook.com/jeanbosco.sibomana.3 FLICKR: Https://www.flickr.com/people/154302350@N04/  YOUTUBE: Http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D&feature=mh_lolz TWITTER: https://twitter.com/sibomanaxyz987
__._,_.___

Envoyé par : Ambassadeur Sibomana Jean Bosco <sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com>

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

Popular Posts

“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.

“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

“When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.”