Skip to main content

Re: *DHR* Sudan:al Bachir set to address UN despite ICC indictments

If Kagame can attend the UN General Assembly, why not Sudanese President Omar Bashir ?



From: "agnesmurebwayire@yahoo.fr" <agnesmurebwayire@yahoo.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2013, 7:23
Subject: *DHR* Sudan:al Bachir set to address UN despite ICC indictments

 
 
 
 
Associated Press - arabnews.com, September 23, 2013
 
 
 
 
If he shows up as scheduled, Sudanese President Omar Bashir will set an uncomfortable precedent when he speaks before the UN General Assembly.
 
 
He would be the first head of state to address the annual UN gathering of world leaders while facing international war crimes and genocide charges.
 
Bashir is facing two International Criminal Court indictments for crimes linked to the conflict in the western Darfur region of Sudan, where an estimated 300,000 people have died since 2003. He has applied for a US visa to come to the UN General Assembly, and is scheduled to speak next Thursday afternoon.
 
 
The US government has made it clear it does not want Bashir to show up in New York.
 
 
"Such a trip would be deplorable, cynical and hugely inappropriate," said Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the United Nations.
But under a US treaty with the United Nations dating to 1947, Washington is obligated to issue the visa as the world body's host country. The United States has never banned a visiting head of state who wants to speak to the United Nations.
State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf sidestepped a question about whether Bashir could be arrested if he comes to the US.
 
 
"There are a variety of considerations in play with respect to President Bashir's visa request, including the outstanding warrant for his arrest," Harf said Friday. "But we're not going to sort through these considerations publicly.  We're going to continue to do so privately and deliberately."
 
 
Sudan's Foreign Ministry has said the United States is "not qualified ... to offer sermons and advice" on international law and human rights and called on Washington to swiftly grant Bashir's visa.
 
 
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon joined the United States in reiterating that Bashir is wanted for genocide and war crimes and should cooperate with the International Criminal Court.
 
 
Elise Keppler, a Sudan expert with Human Rights Watch, said Friday Bashir would be met in New York with angry protests from demonstrators, and could be putting himself in legal jeopardy.
 
 
"The key here is that this is an unprecedented situation," she said. "There hasn't been clear legal ruling on this set of circumstances."
The United States has declined to sign onto the Rome Statute treaty establishing the International Criminal Court, fearing that US citizens — particularly members of the military involved in global conflicts — could be indicted by other countries for war crimes.
 
 
But "other commitments that the US has signed for justice for these kinds of crimes are important," Keppler said.
 
 
"You also have the Genocide Convention that talks about the need to punish those who commit genocide," she said. The United States has ratified that treaty, with the restriction that it will not allow the trial of US citizens for genocide without its consent.
 
 
If Bashir arrives in New York, Keppler said various civil rights and human rights groups could seek to charge him with torture or genocide under US domestic law. Human Rights lawyers have over the past 20 years uses the Alien Tort Act to file civil suits by Americans or foreigners against foreign nationals who come to the United States after committing human rights abuses abroad.
 
 
Bashir's motives for coming to the General Assembly, where he will be shunned by most other world leaders, are unclear. But he has tested the limits of travel under the ICC indictment before, attending an African Union summit in Nigeria in July. He swiftly returned home after protests against his visit broke out and lawsuits were filed.
__._,_.___


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute