Skip to main content

Re: *DHR* Sudan:al Bachir set to address UN despite ICC indictments

If Kagame can attend the UN General Assembly, why not Sudanese President Omar Bashir ?



From: "agnesmurebwayire@yahoo.fr" <agnesmurebwayire@yahoo.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
Sent: Monday, 23 September 2013, 7:23
Subject: *DHR* Sudan:al Bachir set to address UN despite ICC indictments

 
 
 
 
Associated Press - arabnews.com, September 23, 2013
 
 
 
 
If he shows up as scheduled, Sudanese President Omar Bashir will set an uncomfortable precedent when he speaks before the UN General Assembly.
 
 
He would be the first head of state to address the annual UN gathering of world leaders while facing international war crimes and genocide charges.
 
Bashir is facing two International Criminal Court indictments for crimes linked to the conflict in the western Darfur region of Sudan, where an estimated 300,000 people have died since 2003. He has applied for a US visa to come to the UN General Assembly, and is scheduled to speak next Thursday afternoon.
 
 
The US government has made it clear it does not want Bashir to show up in New York.
 
 
"Such a trip would be deplorable, cynical and hugely inappropriate," said Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the United Nations.
But under a US treaty with the United Nations dating to 1947, Washington is obligated to issue the visa as the world body's host country. The United States has never banned a visiting head of state who wants to speak to the United Nations.
State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf sidestepped a question about whether Bashir could be arrested if he comes to the US.
 
 
"There are a variety of considerations in play with respect to President Bashir's visa request, including the outstanding warrant for his arrest," Harf said Friday. "But we're not going to sort through these considerations publicly.  We're going to continue to do so privately and deliberately."
 
 
Sudan's Foreign Ministry has said the United States is "not qualified ... to offer sermons and advice" on international law and human rights and called on Washington to swiftly grant Bashir's visa.
 
 
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon joined the United States in reiterating that Bashir is wanted for genocide and war crimes and should cooperate with the International Criminal Court.
 
 
Elise Keppler, a Sudan expert with Human Rights Watch, said Friday Bashir would be met in New York with angry protests from demonstrators, and could be putting himself in legal jeopardy.
 
 
"The key here is that this is an unprecedented situation," she said. "There hasn't been clear legal ruling on this set of circumstances."
The United States has declined to sign onto the Rome Statute treaty establishing the International Criminal Court, fearing that US citizens — particularly members of the military involved in global conflicts — could be indicted by other countries for war crimes.
 
 
But "other commitments that the US has signed for justice for these kinds of crimes are important," Keppler said.
 
 
"You also have the Genocide Convention that talks about the need to punish those who commit genocide," she said. The United States has ratified that treaty, with the restriction that it will not allow the trial of US citizens for genocide without its consent.
 
 
If Bashir arrives in New York, Keppler said various civil rights and human rights groups could seek to charge him with torture or genocide under US domestic law. Human Rights lawyers have over the past 20 years uses the Alien Tort Act to file civil suits by Americans or foreigners against foreign nationals who come to the United States after committing human rights abuses abroad.
 
 
Bashir's motives for coming to the General Assembly, where he will be shunned by most other world leaders, are unclear. But he has tested the limits of travel under the ICC indictment before, attending an African Union summit in Nigeria in July. He swiftly returned home after protests against his visit broke out and lawsuits were filed.
__._,_.___


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute