Skip to main content

President Museveni of Uganda is planning another genocide afterplanned and organised the Rwandan genocide.

President Museveni of Uganda is planning another genocide after planned and organised the Rwandan genocide.
Museveni's threats against Machar are not helpful. With the support from the UK and USA governments, Museveni heavily armed Kagame to fight the peaceful Rwanda in 1990-1994. The result of this was the genocide. After this Museveni has been fighting in DR Congo where he killed millions of Congolese people. No-one can trust him. He could have used the same rhetoric about South Sudan to prevent genocide in Rwanda. Probably he regrets his support to the war criminal and dictator Paul Kagame and this is why he is trying to do something now in South Sudan. But we all know that he is a staunch supporter of the current South Sudan regime. Rwandan and Ugandan Military troops are already fighting against Machar. By supporting one side of the conflicts, they are preparing another genocide. This is how the Rwandan genocide happened. One side ( Kagame's guerrilla war) of the conflict was supported by Museveni, UK and USA during the Rwanda's war. The International Community should learn from the UK , Uganda and USA's involvement in the Rwanda's war to prevent the genocide in Central African Republic and South Sudan.

'Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni said on Monday east African nations had agreed to move in and defeat Machar if he rejected the ceasefire offer, threatening to turn the fighting into a regional conflict.'
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/31/uk-southsudan-unrest-idUKBRE9BR04R20131231

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UK and US in Africa Great Lakes: A Strategy Built on Sand

  A Strategy Built on Sand: How Western Military Support for Rwanda and Uganda. Fuelled Authoritarianism and Prolonged Conflict in the African Great Lakes Region.   Introduction: The Logic That Failed For more than three decades, the United States and the United Kingdom have invested heavily in building what they hoped would be stable, capable, and pro-Western security partners in the African Great Lakes Region. Rwanda and Uganda were the centrepiece of this strategy. Both governments received billions of dollars in financial assistance, advanced military training, logistical support, and sophisticated equipment. Both were celebrated in Western capitals as models of governance, post-conflict reconstruction, and economic development. That strategy has failed — comprehensively and consequentially. What the United States and United Kingdom created were not pillars of regional stability. They created highly militarised, authoritaria...
Post a Comment
Read more

Working for Money : How France-Based Media Abandoned Credible Journalism to Serve Paul Kagame

A Critical Analysis of Jeune Afrique, Africa Intelligence, Africa Arabia and Le Point.   Introduction. Media organisations do not operate in a political vacuum. When influential publications depend on financial relationships with governments for their commercial survival, the resulting editorial distortions are not incidental — they are structural. In the African Great Lakes region, where political violence, human rights violations and systematic impunity intersect with international diplomacy and foreign investment, the question of who shapes the narrative is not academic. It is a matter of accountability. Several France-based publications — among them Jeune Afrique, Africa Intelligence, Africa Arabia and Le Point — have established themselves as the primary reference points for international audiences seeking to understand Rwanda and its role in Central and East Africa. Their analyses reach diplomats, policymakers, investors and political elites across Af...
Post a Comment
Read more

BBC News

Loading...

Africanews

Loading...

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

Loading...

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Loading...

Migration Policy Institute

Loading...