Skip to main content

Emerald MSc Studentship

Emerald MSc Studentship

Eligibility criteria

  • Open to residents of the following countries
    Uganda, South Africa, Nigeria, Nepal, India, Ethiopia
  • Selection criteria / entrance requirements:

    Compulsory:
    • Only candidates from one of the participating countries within the EMERALD project will be considered (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda)
    • A good to very good overall mark in a health-related undergraduate degree (equivalent in standard to a British Bachelor 2:1 honours degree); or registrable qualification in medicine, appropriate to the programme; or appropriate technical qualification
    • Relevant professional experience in the field of public health
    • English language requirements: 7.0 overall for IELTS, at least 7.0 for written English, at least 6.0 for other skills
    • Commitment by candidate for his/her dissertation to be conducted within the scope of the EMERALD project
    • Commitment by candidate to work for at least a two-year period in their country directly following completion of the MSc course 

    Desirable:
    • Background in mental health related field desirable
    • For candidates from Ethiopia, people working in government universities or institutions will be prioritized over those working in NGOs or the private sector
    • For candidates from India, people working in autonomous organizations or NGOs will be prioritized over those working in government universities or institutions
  • Applicable subjects
    Global Mental Health

Application details

Applications may be submitted
from
 01-Jan-2014 until 30-Apr-2014
Information about the funding

No updated information for 2015 currently available. Please check again in November 2014.


This MSc studentship is being awarded by the EMERALD project in order to build capacity in mental health system delivery and performance in EMERALD countries (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda). 

Overall, the EMERALD project aims to improve mental health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries by generating the evidence and capacity to enhance health system performance, thereby providing more and better mental health care in these countries. It aims to do so by identifying the key health system barriers to, and the solutions for, the scaled-up delivery of mental health services in low- and middle-income countries, and by doing so may improve mental health outcomes in a fair and efficient way. Further information about the project can be found at www.emerald-project.eu
Value of award
Overall value: £35860 (£22660 for fees + £13200 for living costs)
Application procedure
Applicants must complete:
• Online application form at KCL for MSc in Global Mental Health(application assessed by two academics)
• A separate application form for EMERALD studentship
• A potential in-country supervisor should be specified on the application form, together with a brief proposal for their dissertation (this should be agreed between the candidate and the potential supervisor prior to application)

• Deadline for applications: 30th April 2014
• Shortlisting by 15th May 2014
• Interviews by phone/Skype (early June 2014)

Contact details

For futher details on the Global Mental Health Programme please visit:http://www.kcl.ac.uk/iop/depts/hspr/study/gmhMSc.aspx
Funding provider
The Emerald Project

Application material

Please note the database is updated regularly but is a guide only and not a guarantee of funding nor an exhaustive list of all funding available.
http://www.kcl.ac.uk/graduate/funding/database/index.php?action=view&id=540

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute