Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] Why does the dictator and war criminal, Paul Kagame of Rwanda, is frequently claiming that Rwanda does not need UK foreign ?

 

Why does the dictator and war criminal, Paul Kagame of Rwanda, is frequently claiming  that Rwanda does not need UK foreign ?
 
The  most world dictator in living memories, the war criminal Paul Kagame, the President of Rwanda has been fighting against the freedom of speech  beyond his borders. It is within this context that  he recently created the national commission that is investigating the BBC story about Rwanda genocide. If Kagame can challenge BBC, then you can imagine how it is impossible for Rwandan citizen to freely express their opinions to challenges apartheid, cronyism , dictatorship, discrimination and human rights abuses against the majority hutu communities, which represent more than 85 % of the Rwandan population.
 
Anyone who think or say what is contrary to  Kagame's believes  about Africa and the Rwandan genocide, face Kagame regime's unfair attacks for undermining his own version of Rwandan genocide or thinking  governance.
 
Recently, in his national speech, Kagame admitted that the UN warned and advised him to stop his war adventures in order to save the lives of Rwandan people. Kagame admitted that he rejected that  advice and continued the war that was funded by  Museveni of Uganda and the UK Government. This resulted in the horrible massacres that affected all  ethnic  Rwandan ethic groups.
 
Referring to the UK which has been No 1 in providing foreign aid to  Rwanda, Kagame has consistently claiming that  Rwanda does not need UK aid while his country  has more than 70 % of the population which live on less than $1 a day. However, Kagame does frequently release fake economic figures about economic growth to maintain himself on power and to attract more foreign aid. He claims that the country economic growth is now more than 7% without saying  what this 7% of GDP represent or can do for the country. I am just asking a simple question to Kagame:  Can this 7% increase of GDP build a school, hospital, provide cleaning water to 1,000 inhabitants  in Rwanda?
 
Kagame may be right to say that Rwanda does not need foreign aid. Rwandan population is composed of 85% of Hutu, less than 10% of Tutsi and the rest are the Twa community and foreigners ( mainly Ugandans). While Kagame fought a deadly war claiming that  he was fighting for the return of Tutsi refugees, most of these refugees did not go back to Rwanda. Instead, Kagame is joining them abroad where he frequently organise annually Rwanda days (or Kagame days) which are  exclusively attended by these Tutsi who did not return to Rwanda or went in Western countries to claim asylum, leaving behind a country led by the Tutsi who are supposed to protect them.
 
Most  UK foreign aid that was provided to Rwanda for the last 20 years has benefited only the  minority Tutsi  who represent less than 1,000,000 Tutsi  ( i.e. 10 %  for the Rwandan population of 11,000,000). That minority Tutsi live in the capital which is over-resourced in addition to most development activities being targeted to the capital to please the white funders who need  clean streets and good hotels for their own comfort.
 
Kagame regime exists to support this small minority that remained in Rwanda with  the foreign aid that he has been receiving from the UK. All economic resources including financial resources are held by and benefit the Tutsi who own or control all Rwandan businesses, financial institutions and DFID funded programmes.
 
We conclude that the current national economic resources are enough to keep  supporting Tutsi (who are less than 1,00,000) without foreign aid. Even UK government has been claiming that  it has lifted 1,000,000 of Rwandan people out of poverty. These lifted from poverty are exactly the minority Tutsi. 
 

Kagame is therefore not interested in foreign aid because he is only interested in the minority Tutsi's wellbeing, which may be funded  by the current Rwandan resources, without foreign aid supplement provided by UK.


__._,_.___

Posted by: afrikawatch@yahoo.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute