Skip to main content

Fwd: No. 27473: Dispatches: Zimbabwe Purge a Bad Omen for Rights -- Zimbabwe



AfricaFiles



Title: Dispatches: Zimbabwe Purge a Bad Omen for Rights
Author: Dewa Mavhinga
Category: Zimbabwe
Date: 12/11/2014
Source: Human Rights Watch
Source Website: http://www.hrw.org

African Charter Article# 6: Everyone shall have the right to liberty and security of his person including freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention.

Summary & Comment: President Robert Mugabe has been endorsed to be in the charge of government and Zanu PF until 2018, he has chosen a new team to help him do the job. The team has been with him since independence in 1980, its very unlikely that they will bring new thrust to governance. MM



http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/12/11/dispatches-zimbabwe-purge-bad-omen-rights

Sometimes, a political reshuffle can bring new hopes for reform. What's happening in Zimbabwe right now, however, is unlikely to be one of those occasions.

There's no denying a reshuffle is occurring. Yesterday, Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe, who is also leader of the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union - Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF), appointed Justice Minister Emmerson Mnangagwa and Ambassador Phelekezela Mphoko to be his deputies in the party and in government. This follows Mugabe's firing of Vice President Joyce Mujuru from government together with eight other ministers whom he publicly accused of plotting to murder him.

Plus, last week, during ZANU-PF's 6th Congress, Mugabe had secured party endorsement to be the party's 2018 presidential candidate, when he will be 94; appointed his wife to head the women's wing of the party; and had the party's constitution amended to allow him to make all senior party appointments.

For many Zimbabweans, these changes in the ZANU-PF leadership, particularly Mugabe's presidential endorsement for 2018, reflect a consolidation of Mugabe's grip on the party and government, a retention of the status quo and dash expectations for lasting rights reforms.

As justice minister, Mnangagwa recently refused to approve the death sentence for 97 murder convicts, criticizing the death penalty as too harsh. But he was also in charge of state security between 1980 and 1988, when the government deployed the North Korean-trained Fifth Brigade, which slaughtered an estimated 20,000 civilians in Matebeleland and Midlands provinces in what became known as the Gukurahundi massacres. No one was ever held accountable for those a, despite excellent documentation from local civil society groups.

Mnangagwa and his supporters are widely perceived to be hardliners likely to use repressive measures to control Zimbabweans while ignoring steps to improve the human rights environment and people's livelihoods. On the other hand, the now vanquished Mujuru camp was viewed as moderate and open to engagement to push for rights and governance reforms that could have restored investor confidence and revived the economy.

Mugabe's purge of several senior officials has created tension within the party and could trigger instability within the country, as ZANU-PF has close ties to the security forces leadership, which has a long history of being highly partisan on behalf of the ruling party.

It would be good to see President Mugabe and his "new" crop of party leaders publicly commit to respect human rights, back democratic processes and implement important rights reforms essential for economic development and improvement in the lives of ordinary Zimbabweans. Few feel this reshuffle will bring that.






Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the AfricaFiles' editors and network members. They are included in our material as a reflection of a diversity of views and a variety of issues. Material written specifically for AfricaFiles may be edited for length, clarity or inaccuracies.


AfricaFiles - solidarity and justice for Africa
300 Bloor St. West, Room 21
Toronto, ON M5S 1W3, Canada.
Email: info@africafiles.org
Website: www.africafiles.org
Social media: Facebook, Podcast, Twitter.


--
Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute