Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] How Tony Blair Inc spent £57 million in four years

 

How Tony Blair Inc spent £57 million in four years


Analysis of business accounts shows just how expensive former PM's life as an international fixer has become

216
242
1
14
473
Email
Former prime minister Tony Blair at the Blair Foundation office in Grosvenor Square, London, 23/07/2012
Tony Blair insists he is worth only £10 million, but the accounts suggest he runs a thriving business worth far more than that Photo: Andrew Crowley/The Telegraph
Robert Mendick
By , Chief Reporter
8:55AM GMT 11 Jan 2015
He criss-crosses the globe in private jets, rents offices in a townhouse in one of London's most exclusive squares and stays in some of the world's finest hotels.
But Tony Blair's life as an international fixer has become a costly business.
Just how expensive can now be disclosed – for an analysis of Mr Blair's business accounts shows the former prime minister and his advisers and consultants have run up expenses and salaries totalling around £57 million in just four years – equivalent to £350,000 a year for each of his staff.
Running Blair Inc does not come cheap.
The Telegraph examined accounts for Mr Blair's complex network of companies set up following his departure from Downing Street in 2007, and which channel money for Tony Blair Associates, the umbrella organisation for Mr Blair's various commercial interests.
Last week, Mr Blair filed accounts for six companies and partnerships registered with Companies House. What they show is a consultancy business spending a fortune on travel, hotels, rent and salaries.
Mr Blair insists he is worth only £10 million, but the accounts suggest he runs a thriving business worth far more than that.
Investigations show that Mr Blair has divided his commercial activities into two broad groupings: one a consultancy which advises governments around the world, funded through a group of companies called Windrush Ventures; and another which advises companies and sovereign wealth funds through the trading arm Firerush Ventures.
According to the latest accounts, Windrush Ventures employs 37 staff at its headquarters in Grosvenor Square, London, and in such far-flung countries as Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Peru, Colombia, Brazil and Kuwait. It requires constant travel between London and its satellite offices.
Windrush Ventures Ltd, a company set up to run the business, spent almost £13  million in the 12 months to March 31 last year, paying wages, air fares and subsistence for staff, including Mr Blair. It also spends £550,000 a year renting the London headquarters. Windrush paid just less than £300,000 in corporation tax, on gross profits reduced by the large expenses bill. Its post-tax profits were just over £800,000.
In the previous three years, it spent £35 million on ''administrative expenses'', although details of this cost were not disclosed.
The money Mr Blair earns from Windrush cannot be determined because he hides its income in another entity he set up on leaving Downing Street called Windrush Ventures Limited Partnership. As a limited partnership, it is under no obligation to file accounts with Companies House. What it does do is pay a fee to Windrush Ventures Ltd for its services in running Mr Blair's business.
Mr Blair employs the same structure with Firerush Ventures, the part of Blair Inc that offers advice to companies and investment funds such as Mubadala, the sovereign wealth fund owned by Abu Dhabi's ruling family.
Firerush, for example, was at one stage being paid about $65,000 (£40,000) a month for strategic advice for a Saudi Arabian oil company linked to the Saudi ruling family. The fee included introducing the company to investors in China, where Mr Blair has also been a frequent visitor.
Clients of Firerush pay their fees into Firerush Ventures Limited Partnership, which ultimately pays a management fee to Firerush Ventures Limited.
Last year, Firerush Ventures Ltd was paid £2.4 million to manage that arm of Mr Blair's business. But the scale of the fees paid into the Limited Partnership also remains hidden from public view. The total £57 million figure consists of around £48 million of "administrative expenses" to Windrush and an estimated £8.5 million in "management services" to Firerush.
A senior accountant who studied Mr Blair's accounts last week said: "He is rather artfully putting his income into a partnership that has no requirement to file public accounts. You can never get to the bottom of what his income is because it always goes into an entity that has to file nowhere other than with HM Revenue & Customs."
The accountant went on: "The expenditure is enormous. If he has 37 staff and a wage bill of £2.7 million then that leaves £10 million on other expenses.
"That is an awful lot of travel. It is a huge sum of money. The expenses are incredible."
Mr Blair has taken to travelling the world in a private jet, preferring to use a £30 million Bombardier Global Express, which he leases on a regular basis and which has been dubbed Blair Force One.
The jet can comfortably accommodate his sizeable entourage, including personal assistants and Metropolitan Police close protection officers paid for by the British taxpayer. Mr Blair will often stay in the world's smartest hotels, including the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi, where suites typically cost £5,000 a night.
But Mr Blair's staff also need their travel and accommodation paid for. Dr Andreas Baumgartner, for example, an Austrian lawyer and a partner in Tony Blair Associates, is based in Abu Dhabi.
In April, he turned up in Kyzylorda, an obscure city in the Kazakh desert, where he met Krymbek Kusherbayev, the regional governor. Kyzylorda is rich in oil fields, and China especially has invested heavily in the region.
Last week, Mr Blair's office issued a statement insisting that "the financial results released today present the operating costs of the businesses, and additional sums that may be held back in corporate reserves for investment in future years.
"Mr Blair is a UK taxpayer and pays full personal tax on all his earnings worldwide."
A spokesman disputed the £57 million figure.


__._,_.___

Posted by: Africa Realities <africarealities@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute