Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] Not all has been said by the BBC untold story about Rwandan war: UK Government discrimination against Rwandan Hutu asylum seekers.

 

Not all has been said by  the BBC untold story about Rwandan war: UK Government discrimination against Rwandan  Hutu asylum seekers.
 
The war criminal President  Kagame of Rwanda is seeking a third term after more than 20 years on power. Uganda, Kagame, US and UK killed the former President  Habyarimana for regime change claiming that  it was time to replace him by another leader. That leader is Kagame.
 
Now, Kagame claims that because he is loved by Rwandan people, he should  change the constitution to allow him to stand again. He has opened debate between himself and his Tutsi supporters. 
Kagame is debating the third term with himself.
Anyone who does not support Kagame is in jail, they have been killed by Kagame, or they are in exile. Everybody now  understand that the former President Habyarimana had the right to be  loved by Rwandan people too. Rwandan people had the rights to love President  Habyarimana in the same way Kagame is being loved by Rwandan people. Many Rwandan  Hutu were killed or forced  simply because they were supporters of the former President. They were forced into exile where they are being prevented from having access to their rights.
 
The British Government does not  grant refugee status and  British nationality to  Hutu people who have served under Habyarimana regime. Any  Rwandan who was a civil servant, a teacher, a local administrator or  have been a member of Habyarimana ruling party has been refused the refugee status or British nationality in the UK. The British Home Office officials call them Hutu intellectuals in other words Hutu killers.  According to British Government any Hutu intellectual  has committed war crimes and genocide. The Hutu's former positions, ethnicity  and education backgrounds are the main tests used by British Officials to grant asylum, refugee status and British nationality to Hutu asylum seekers.
 
Those hutu people are considered in block as suspects who have committed war crimes  and genocide. They all fail  British nationality test which is based ethnicity and character . Being a former civil servant or member of former ruling party is a bad character.

The civil seravants were working under the former regime to earn a living. They had the right to like  the former President or to belong to his political party. This does not mean that  they all committed war crimes and genocide. 

At the same time the Tutsi and Ugandan people who came to UK and claimed asylum saying that  they were all Rwandans were granted  refugee status and British nationality. Many of them were among Kagame's guerrilla fighters who killed civilian people during  Kagame's war  from 1990 to 1996, war that was culminated by the mass killings of Hutu refugees in the DRC.
 
The UK  Home Office should review the way they have been treating Rwandan asylum seekers for the last 20 years.
 

More at: Rwanda's Untold Story Documentary

 
 

__._,_.___

Posted by: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
https://www.facebook.com/onlinedatinginafrica

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute