Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] Israel thinks African asylum seekers aren’t human beings

 

Israel thinks African asylum seekers aren't human beings
 
The government will stop at nothing to expel African seekers - despite court rulings and the dangers they face back home.
The Israeli government won't stop at anything to expel the African asylum seekers who have made their way here. First, it tried to imprison them without trial in the Saharonim Prison. When the High Court of Justice forbade that, the government concocted a new scheme: It shortened the period of detention at Saharonim and set up a new, "open" facility atHolot, where it sought to detain asylum seekers indefinitely on the pretext that it wasn't a jail, but a "residential facility." The High Court of Justice was once again forced to raise its voice and declare that it was the same lady in different clothing — a violation of the same prohibition: Imprisoning people without trial.
Twice, therefore, the High Court has reminded the state of what it ought to know: Asylum seekers – to whom everyone agrees the principle of non-refoulement applies, meaning they can't be deported to their home countries of Eritrea and Sudan because of the dangers they would face there – cannot be jailed without trial. It's permissible to jail foreigners in Israel prior to deporting them, but only when a legal basis for their deportation exists.
Instead of internalizing that message, the government once again concocted a new scheme: It submitted legislation that allows it to continue jailing asylum seekers at Saharonim and Holot, but for shorter periods than previously, and it also "prettied up" Holot by canceling the noon roll-call that inmates previously had to attend.

A High Court petition against this law is currently pending and the court will presumably come down on the side of the law and justice by telling the state, for the third time, that what it's doing is forbidden.
At the same time, the government instituted a new policy of deporting asylum seekers to Uganda and Rwanda, without having obtained clear guarantees of their safety and freedom in those countries. In the past, the state depicted this policy as "voluntary departure," but it has now adopted a clear policy under which anyone who refuses to be deported will be jailed at Saharonim.

The
 Be'er Sheva District Court's refusal to issue an injunction forbidding their imprisonment will allow the state to resume jailing asylum seekers – people who haven't broken any law and who do not belong in jail.
Information about the bitter fate of asylum seekers who did leave for Rwanda and Uganda was submitted to the court, but it deemed this information insufficient. It also wasn't convinced by the expert opinion of Galia Sabar, a professor of African studies, who said the deportees can't work and support themselves in those countries. The court thereby failed to protect the asylum seekers, and it must be hoped that its decision will be overturned in subsequent stages of the legal proceedings.
Nevertheless, the most worrisome question about this whole affair is this: Why does the State of Israel think African asylum seekers aren't human beings, and that therefore it's permissible to dump them in whatever country is willing to take them under cover of a shady deal? The right thing to do would be to enable the asylum seekers to live in dignity and freedom here in Israel as long as circumstances don't allow them to return to their homelands.

__._,_.___

Posted by: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
http://www.primescholarships.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.africanaffection.com
http://www.datinginafrica.com/
http://www.foraha.net
https://www.facebook.com/onlinedatinginafrica

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute