Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] US continues to demand Nkurunziza stand down in Burundi | Ann Garrison

 

US continues to demand Nkurunziza stand down in Burundi

Submitted by Ann Garrison on Sun, 07/19/2015 - 22:51

 

KPFA Weekend News, 07.19.2015

Burundi's presidential election is scheduled to take place on Tuesday, July 21st. Nevertheless, the US State Department continues to demand that President Pierre Nkurunziza stand down.

 

Transcript: 
KPFA EVENING NEWS ANCHOR ANTHONY FEST: Turning now to news from Africa, UN human rights investigators have asked President Pierre Nkurunziza campaigningthe UN Security Council to take urgent action to prevent mass violence in the tiny East African nation of Burundi and the surrounding region. At the same time, US Under Secretary of State for African Affairs Linda Thomas Greenfield reiterated the US demand that Burundian President Pierre Nkurunziza step down. Nearly two months ago, Russia and China blocked a UN Security Council resolution censuring Nkurunziza for choosing to run for a third term, and said that the Council should stay out of the sovereign nation's internal affairs. 
 
Nkurunziza's party has already won a large majority in parliament and Agence France Presse reports that he's hugely popular with the rural peasant majority. The presidential election is scheduled to take place in two days, on July 21st. KPFA's Ann Garrison has the story.

KPFA/ANN GARRISON: UN human rights investigators have joined the US State Department in blaming Burundian President Pierre Nkurunziza's decision to seek a third term for the street violence that began in several neighborhoods in Burundi's capital in April. They also blame Nkurunziza for the cross border flight of more than 100,000 Burundian refugees fearing election violence. The refugees have crossed Burundi's borders into Tanzania, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Curiously, neither the UN investigators nor the US State Department blame the Burundian military officers who staged a failed coup attempt in May, then fled and declared war on Burundi from outside its borders.    
 
Rwanda and Burundi share not only a border but also the bi-polar Hutu-Tutsi demographic. Like Uganda, Rwanda and Tanzania, Burundi also shares a border with eastern DR Congo.Hostilities between Rwanda and Burundi have increased since April, with the two country's presidents exchanging threats. Last week, Burundian soldiers clashed with troops near Burundi's northern border. Burundi blamed Rwanda and said the troops had crossed its northern border, but Rwanda denied responsibility. Rwanda and Burundi share not only a border but also the bi-polar Hutu and Tutsi ethnic demographic and history of mass violence, and many have warned that the violence may resume as it did in the 1990s, when it spilled over into the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where it continues to this day.  
 
This week, Shaka Ssali, the Ugandan born host of Voice of America's Straight Talk Africa, asked US Undersecretary of of State for African Affairs Linda Thomas Greenfield why the US is so fiercely focused on Burundi and so determined that President Nkurunziza step down.  
 
SHAKA SSALI: Let's go to the issue of Burundi, the Burundi crisis. The State Department has been very very vocal on Burundi. They have basically in fact focused on the issue of President Pierre Nkurunziza like a sort of political laser beam. What is it that needs to be resolved in Burundi? Because we're not talking about changing the constitution here. We're talking about tweaking it, perhaps.
 
LINDA THOMAS-GREENFIELD: Well, what we're talking about in Burundi is transition. What we're talking about is President Nkurunziza accepting the fact that he has had two full terms as president and honoring the principles of the Arusha Accord, which limits the president to two full terms. There are interpretations being made of the Constitution that suggest that his first term was not an elected term by popular vote, so it doesn't count, but in fact, we believe it does.
 
KPFA: A member of the Straight Talk Africa audience asked why US policy is inconsistent in the region. Greenfield responded that US policy is consistent.
 
THOMAS-GREENFIELD: Look, our policy is very consistent and it's global. It is not about one country, it is not about one region, it is not about the African continent. 
 
KPFA: However, the facts of recent elections in the African Great Lakes Region point to radically inconsistent US policy. The Democratic Republic of the Congo's President Joseph Kabila and Rwanda's President Paul Kagame were both appointed to their first terms and both went on to claim the constitutional right to be elected twice by universal suffrage, without protest by the US. Now, as Nkurunziza claims the same right, the US and UN human rights investigators blame him for risking mass violence in Burundi and even regional war.
 
The regional tensions are no doubt real, the danger of mass violence great, but the African Great Lakes Region is so resource rich that the resource interests of the world's industrial and military power elites are inevitably in play behind the news. Burundi has signed a lease to mine its nickel, cobalt, and copper reserves with a Russian firm. And, like Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania, Burundi shares a geostrategic border with the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, a vast storehouse of strategic mineral reserves.   
 
For Pacifica, KPFA and AfrobeatRadio, I'm Ann Garrison.

 


###
"Hate Cannot Drive Out Hate. Only Love Can Do That", Dr. Martin Luther King.
###

__._,_.___
Posted by: Nzinink <nzinink@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group • Start a New Topic • Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
http://www.primescholarships.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.africanaffection.com
http://www.datinginafrica.com/
http://www.foraha.net
https://www.facebook.com/onlinedatinginafrica

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rwanda's Security Narrative and Eastern DRC: Why Many Say It Is Overstated

Rwanda's Security Narrative and Eastern DRC: Why Many Say It Is Overstated Introduction Rwanda frequently presents itself as a militarily capable state, yet it claims it must cross into the Democratic Republic of the Congo to protect itself. This argument raises a fundamental question: if Rwanda possesses such military strength, why cannot it defend itself within its own borders? Critics argue that ongoing cross-border operations, civilian displacement, mineral exploitation, and the establishment of parallel administrations cannot be justified as legitimate self-defence. This perspective is not marginal. It reflects mainstream reasoning across Congolese civil society, regional commentary, and an increasing number of international briefings that examine patterns of territorial control, governance structures, and political economy rather than focusing solely on immediate cross-border threats. A fundamental principle underpins this critique: whilst any state is entitled to hav...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Rwanda Got It Wrong: The Moral Cost of Profiting from Congo's Suffering.

Introduction. At the 20th Umushyikirano National Dialogue Council in Kigali in February 2026, President Paul Kagame publicly stated that it is acceptable for minerals originating in the Democratic Republic of Congo to pass through Rwanda and be sold internationally. Whilst defending Rwanda's ambitions to become a mineral processing hub, he likened this practice to passengers travelling through Kigali airport en route to other destinations, arguing that whilst wealthy countries benefit most from this trade, Rwanda's participation is normal and justified. However, this framing fundamentally misrepresents a deeply troubling reality: the minerals in question are not legitimately transiting through Rwanda as part of normal trade, but are being extracted under conditions of conflict, violence, and mass suffering imposed by Rwandan-backed forces. The distinction between legitimate cross-border trade and the current situation cannot be overstated. Cross-border commerce between Rwan...
Post a Comment
Read more

BBC News

Loading...

Africanews

Loading...

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

Loading...

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Loading...

Migration Policy Institute

Loading...