Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities.com] ITV News wrong to give platform to Rwanda's genocide mastermind

 


Kambanda
 John Ray, Africa correspondent for ITV News, interviews Jean Kambanda in a Mali prison. Photograph: ITV News

I am pleased to carry this guest blog by Linda Melvern, who has written extensively about the 1994 Rwandan genocide and acted as a consultant to the prosecution team at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.*

It was billed as a world scoop: the Africacorrespondent for ITV, John Ray, had gained access to a top security prison in Mali which housed the men behind Africa's "final solution."

Until now these Rwandans had remained as silent as the memorials to their victims, we are told, and here was the first television interview with one of them, Jean Kambanda, the world's first head of government to plead guilty to the crime of genocide. It was broadcast on 21 July. 

Advertisement

It is 17 years since Kambanda was last seen in public and he has put on weight since he was sentenced to a life term at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) in September 1998. 

The prisoner, a former economist and banker, wearing an immaculate dark suit and tie, sits with Ray in the prison library calmly claiming he is innocent of all charges and was tricked into making his 1997 confession. He insists his conscience is clear. 

Kambanda was the prime minister of a government created with the purpose of controlling the administration of the genocide of the Tutsi; his government's national policy was the creation of a "pure Hutu state" with no Tutsi at all. 

In his confession he revealed how the policy of genocide was the subject of cabinet meetings. "We discussed the evolution of the massacres in each prefecture," he said. 

Advertisement

In three months of genocide, during which up to one million people were murdered, Kambanda ensured that local authorities had enough people to carry out the killing and made sure that those unwilling to take part were eliminated. 

The interview with Kambanda caused great upset in Rwanda. The National Commission for the Fight against Genocide (CNLG) sent a note of protest to the ICTR. According to the CNLG, a 1999 agreement between Mali and the United Nations does not allow ICTR genocide convicts to have access to media to deny the crimes for which they were convicted and imprisoned.

These convicts are apparently forbidden from spreading their hateful Hutu power propaganda used in the preparation and execution of the genocide of the Tutsi, and they are banned from peddling political propaganda. 

Kambanda's claim of innocence is no surprise. He is a past master at genocide denial. In April 1994, when the evidence of genocide was emerging from Rwanda in the form of bodies washed down the rivers, the Kambanda government organised a campaign of diplomatic news spin to try to persuade the world that the deaths were due to "fighting" in a renewed civil war.

The genocide of the Tutsi was the result of a chain of command and a prepared strategy. It was a conspiracy at national level, but without the complicity of the local and national civil and military authorities, the large-scale massacres would not have taken place. 

As genocide progressed in 1994 Kambanda and his ministers were ensconced in a peaceful, modern schoolyard in a flower garden. Here were the middle-aged and well-dressed men and women of government going about their business.

Melvern
 Linda Melvern's updated book Photograph: Amazon

After he fled with his criminal gang of ministers into exile Kambanda continued to promote a policy of genocide denial. Several of his colleagues have since written books to further promote their own falsification of history. 

From their top security prison they have the luxury of a library, gym, a vegetable garden and a small church. It is from here that they peddle their "Hutu Power" ideology which underpinned their atrocious crimes.

Advertisement

For the survivors of genocide this causes the greatest distress. For them, the genocide is not a distant event from 20 years ago but a reality with which they live every day. 

Genocide denial follows the crime as night follows day and its purpose is the destruction of truth and memory. We should question the wisdom of giving an unrepentant génocidaire any air-time and ask whether or not we should encourage attempts at the falsification of history.

©Linda Melvern

*Linda Melvern is a freelance journalist. Her book, A People Betrayed: the role of the west in Rwanda's genocide (Zed Books) is in its fifth impression and is widely regarded as the most comprehensive account of the genocide.

See also the views of Shyaka Kanuma, editor of the Rwanda Focus, Who enabled ITV to access Kambanda?

ITV News has issued a statement - also posted above John Ray's website report - in which it says that Ray's report "highlighted in some detail the scale of the atrocities that occurred in Rwanda in 1994" and said of Kambanda that he "presided over the Rwandan genocide." It continued:

"In the interview itself we strongly challenged the former prime minister's denials. He was asked directly why he did not stop the killing, and why he distributed weapons to the Hutu killers.

The report also placed the facts in context:

*A response was included from one of the best known experts on the genocide, and an interview with a children's nurse who blamed Kambanda personally for doing nothing to save Tutsi children sheltering in hospital.

*The 800,000 death toll was described as "monstrous crimes."

*In a studio interview, John Ray said many people – including the present Rwandan government – would dismiss everything Kambanda says as a "self-serving attempt to re-write history."

The report was an example of robust and balanced, independent journalism. The report raised awareness of one of the most chilling episodes of recent African history.

Any interview with a controversial figure will raise difficult ethical issues. Fundamentally, it is our duty to inform the public. This can include interviews with controversial individuals. This is a legitimate function of a news organisation."



###
"Hate Cannot Drive Out Hate. Only Love Can Do That", Dr. Martin Luther King.
###

__._,_.___

Posted by: Nzinink <nzinink@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.
I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile.
The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
When the white man came we had the land and they had the bibles; now they have the land and we have the bibles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-New International Scholarships opportunities: http://www.scholarshipsgate.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find  Friends in Africa:
http://www.africanaffection.com
http://www.datinginafrica.com/
http://www.foraha.net
https://www.facebook.com/onlinedatinginafrica

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute