Skip to main content

Rwanda: 8 year prison sentence for Political prisoner Ingabire

Kigali, 30 October 2012

 

Rwanda: 8 year prison sentence for Political prisoner Ingabire

 

Finally the High court issues ruling in Ingabire political case: 8 years in prison for genocide ideology and conspiracy against the government by use of war and terrorism. This kangaroo ruling is "politically and intellectually dishonest" and so poorly formulated but the political prisoner Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, FDU-Inkingi Chairperson, is not filing an appeal because she has totally lost confidence in this judiciary circus. By giving orders to the judicial to sentence Madame Victoire Ingabire to 8 years behind bars, President Paul Kagame's regime has missed the last corner for any chance of reconciliation, unity and stability in this country. Rwanda will never be the same.


The prosecutor's key witnesses all pleading guilty after questionable detention in military intelligence facilities receive the following sentences: Vital Uwumuremyi 4 years 6 months, Tharcisse Nditurende and Noel Habiyaremye 3 years 6 months, Jean Marie Karuta 2 years 7 months.

This is a conclusion of a long chapter of hope that the current dictatorship would understand how important peace, genuine unity and sustainable reconciliation are. The sentence comes amidst unrelenting interferences of President Paul Kagame and his government which has been shifting goals hoping to psychologically erode the moral of the political prisoner. She was arrested in October 2010 and charged with forming an armed group with the aim of destabilising the country, complicity to acts of terrorism, conspiracy against the government by use of war and terrorism, inciting the masses to revolt against the government, genocide ideology and divisionism.

 
According to international human rughts organisations, the process was marred by intimidation, interferences and unfairness. On 8 October 2012, Amnesty International wrote that "the trial of opposition politician, Victoire Ingabire, provides another example of where judges have failed to probe the detention conditions of defendants.(...) The court prevented Victoire Ingabire's defence team from asking questions about detention conditions in Camp Kami, as the co-accused themselves had not lodged a complaint. They were unable to clarify if the co-accusers' evidence may have been coerced or induced. The court made no efforts to obtain notes taken during the interrogations of the co-accused at Camp Kami, even though they might have contained exculpatory information potentially instrumental to Victoire Ingabire's defence, such as indications that the statements were not made voluntarily..."

 

We call upon members of FDU-Inkingi, all members of the opposition and all Rwandans to remain calm and to get ready for the day to march until freedom is won. Until our last breath, we will not give up.


FDU-Inkingi
Interim Vice President
Boniface Twagirimana.

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
THAT WHO KEEPS SILENT IN THE MIDST OF TYRANY IS AS GUILTY OF OPPRESSION AS THE TYRANT HIMSELF. Please use the following link: https://ffdrwanda.org/Donate.html  to DONATE to the struggle for democracy in Rwanda.

Youthdemocrats is an Internet Forum aiming at furthering the 
activities of the Foundation for Freedom and Democracy in Rwanda, Inc.
We expect postings of only the highest quality, appropriate to the 
ongoing struggle for Freedom, Democracy and Justice in Rwanda, rather 
than personal messages.

Members of this group remain solely responsible for the content of 
their messages, and agree to indemnify and hold harmless the 
Foundation for Freedom and Democracy in Rwanda with respect to any 
claim based upon transmission of messages.

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Rwanda's Security Narrative and Eastern DRC: Why Many Say It Is Overstated

Rwanda's Security Narrative and Eastern DRC: Why Many Say It Is Overstated Introduction Rwanda frequently presents itself as a militarily capable state, yet it claims it must cross into the Democratic Republic of the Congo to protect itself. This argument raises a fundamental question: if Rwanda possesses such military strength, why cannot it defend itself within its own borders? Critics argue that ongoing cross-border operations, civilian displacement, mineral exploitation, and the establishment of parallel administrations cannot be justified as legitimate self-defence. This perspective is not marginal. It reflects mainstream reasoning across Congolese civil society, regional commentary, and an increasing number of international briefings that examine patterns of territorial control, governance structures, and political economy rather than focusing solely on immediate cross-border threats. A fundamental principle underpins this critique: whilst any state is entitled to hav...

How Rwanda Got It Wrong: The Moral Cost of Profiting from Congo's Suffering.

Introduction. At the 20th Umushyikirano National Dialogue Council in Kigali in February 2026, President Paul Kagame publicly stated that it is acceptable for minerals originating in the Democratic Republic of Congo to pass through Rwanda and be sold internationally. Whilst defending Rwanda's ambitions to become a mineral processing hub, he likened this practice to passengers travelling through Kigali airport en route to other destinations, arguing that whilst wealthy countries benefit most from this trade, Rwanda's participation is normal and justified. However, this framing fundamentally misrepresents a deeply troubling reality: the minerals in question are not legitimately transiting through Rwanda as part of normal trade, but are being extracted under conditions of conflict, violence, and mass suffering imposed by Rwandan-backed forces. The distinction between legitimate cross-border trade and the current situation cannot be overstated. Cross-border commerce between Rwan...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute