Skip to main content

Rwanda: The Genocide Ideology law

http://www.ecoi.net/file_upload/1504_1256556631_law-relating-to-the-punishment-of-the-crime-of-genocide-ideology.pdf

LAW N°18/2008 OF 23/07/2008 RELATING TO THE PUNISHMENT OF THE 
CRIME OF GENOCIDE IDEOLOGY 
  
Chapter 1.  GENERAL PROVISIONS  

Article:  1 Purpose of this law  
This Law aims at preventing and punishing the crime of genocide ideology. 

Article:  2 Definition of "genocide ideology" 
The genocide ideology is an aggregate of thoughts characterized by conduct, speeches, 
documents and other acts aiming at exterminating or inciting others to exterminate 
people basing on ethnic group, origin, nationality, region, color, physical appearance, 
sex, language, religion or political opinion, committed in normal periods or during war. 
  
Article:  3 Characteristics of the crime of genocide ideology 
The crime of genocide ideology is characterized in any behaviour manifested by facts 
aimed at deshumanizing a person or a group of persons with the same characteristics in 
the following manner: 
1° threatening, intimidating, degrading through defamatory speeches, documents 
or actions which aim at propounding wickedness or inciting hatred; 
2° marginalising, laughing at one's  misfortune, defaming, mocking, boasting, 
despising, degrading creating confusion aiming at negating the genocide which 
occurred, stirring up ill feelings, taking revenge, altering testimony or evidence 
for the genocide which occurred; 
3° killing, planning to kill or attempting to kill someone for purposes of 
furthering genocide ideology. 

Chapter 2.  PENALTIES  
Article:  4 Sentencing the crime of genocide ideology 
Any person convicted of the crime of genocide ideology as mentioned in Articles 2 and 
3 of this Law shall be sentenced to an imprisonment of ten (10) years to twenty five (25) 
years and a fine of two hundred thousand (200.000) to one million (1.000.000) 
Rwandan francs. 
In case of recidivism, the penalty provided  for in the preceding paragraph shall be 
doubled.   

  Article:  5 Penalty awarded to a genocide ideology convict found guilty of the 
crime of genocide 
Any person found guilty of the ideology of genocide who was convicted of the crime of 
genocide, shall be sentenced to life imprisonment.
 
Article:  6 Penalties awarded to current and former leaders 
In case the perpetrator of the crime of  genocide ideology is a  leader in public 
administrative organs, political organisation,  private administrative organs, or a non 
governmental organs, a religious leader, or a former leader in such organs, he/she shall 
be sentenced to an imprisonment of fifteen (15) years to twenty five (25) years and 
a fine of two million (2.000.000) to five million (5.000.000) Rwandan francs. 
  
Article:  7 Penalties awarded to associations, a political organization and non 
profit making organization 
Any association, political organization or non profit making organisation convicted of 
the crime of the ideology of genocide shall be subject to a punishment of its dissolution 
in accordance with legal provisions relating to dissolution of associations, political 
organisations and non profit making associations and a fine of five million (5.000.000) 
to ten million (10.000.000) Rwandan francs without prejudice to individual liability of 
any participant in the commission of the crime. 
  
Article:  8 Penalties for disseminating genocide ideology 
Any person who disseminates genocide ideology in public through documents, 
speeches, pictures, media or any other means shall be sentenced to an imprisonment 
from twenty (20) years to twenty-five (25) years and a fine of two million (2. 000. 000) 
to five million (5.000.000) Rwandan francs. 

Article:  9 Penalties awarded to children guilty of the crime of genocide ideology 
In case a child under twelve years (12) of age is found guilty of a crime of genocide 
ideology, he or she shall be taken to a rehabilitation centre for a period not exceeding 
twelve (12) months. 
In case a child who is found guilty of the crime of genocide ideology is between twelve 
(12) and eighteen (18) years,  he or she shall be sentenced to a half of the penalty 
referred to in Article 4 of this Law, without prejudice to the possibility that a part or 
whole of the sentence may be served in the rehabilitation centre. 
  
Article:  10 Follow up of a child who is in or was in a rehabilitation centre 
An Order of the Minister in charge of rehabilitation centres shall determine procedures 
through which children referred to in Article 9 of this Law are followed up while in 
rehabilitation centres and during their social reintegration. 

  Article:  11 Penalties awarded to parents and to other guardians of the child 
In case it is evident that the parent of the child referred to in Article 9 of this Law, the 
guardian, the tutor, the teacher or the school  headmaster of the child participated in 
inoculating the genocide ideology, they shall be sentenced to an imprisonment of fifteen 
(15) years to twenty five (25) years. 
A teacher or a director referred to in the preceding paragraph cannot be reintegrated into 
his teaching career.
 
Article:  12 Penalty awarded to a murderer, a conspirator or attempted murderer 
Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 4 of this Law, any person who kills 
another, one who conspires or who attempts to kill basing on the ideology of genocide 
shall be sentenced to a life imprisonment. 
There shall be no mitigating circumstance regarding this crime. 
  
Article:  13 Penalties against false accusers 
Any person found guilty of false accusations of the crime of genocide ideology referred 
to in Article 4 of this Law shall be liable to the punishment provided for by the penal 
Code.   
  
Article:  14 Damages 
Damages awarded to victims of the crime of the ideology of genocide shall be 
determined in accordance with provisions of civil procedure. 

Chapter 3.  FINAL PROVISIONS  
Article:  15 Abrogating provisions 
All prior legal provisions contrary to this Law are hereby repealed. 
  
Article:  16 Commencement 
This Law shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of 
the Republic of Rwanda. 

Kigali, on 23/07/2008 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Rwanda's Security Narrative and Eastern DRC: Why Many Say It Is Overstated

Rwanda's Security Narrative and Eastern DRC: Why Many Say It Is Overstated Introduction Rwanda frequently presents itself as a militarily capable state, yet it claims it must cross into the Democratic Republic of the Congo to protect itself. This argument raises a fundamental question: if Rwanda possesses such military strength, why cannot it defend itself within its own borders? Critics argue that ongoing cross-border operations, civilian displacement, mineral exploitation, and the establishment of parallel administrations cannot be justified as legitimate self-defence. This perspective is not marginal. It reflects mainstream reasoning across Congolese civil society, regional commentary, and an increasing number of international briefings that examine patterns of territorial control, governance structures, and political economy rather than focusing solely on immediate cross-border threats. A fundamental principle underpins this critique: whilst any state is entitled to hav...

How Rwanda Got It Wrong: The Moral Cost of Profiting from Congo's Suffering.

Introduction. At the 20th Umushyikirano National Dialogue Council in Kigali in February 2026, President Paul Kagame publicly stated that it is acceptable for minerals originating in the Democratic Republic of Congo to pass through Rwanda and be sold internationally. Whilst defending Rwanda's ambitions to become a mineral processing hub, he likened this practice to passengers travelling through Kigali airport en route to other destinations, arguing that whilst wealthy countries benefit most from this trade, Rwanda's participation is normal and justified. However, this framing fundamentally misrepresents a deeply troubling reality: the minerals in question are not legitimately transiting through Rwanda as part of normal trade, but are being extracted under conditions of conflict, violence, and mass suffering imposed by Rwandan-backed forces. The distinction between legitimate cross-border trade and the current situation cannot be overstated. Cross-border commerce between Rwan...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute