Skip to main content

Kigali wants federal state in eastern DRC, US Congress told

 

Kigali wants federal state in eastern DRC, US Congress told

Controversy over Rwanda's alleged support for M23 rebels is set to deepen after the Kagame administration was sensationally accused before the US Congress of pushing to establish a federal state in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.

Steve Hege, who co-ordinated the UN Group of Experts on Congo until its mandate expired at the end of November, told the US Congress that the Rwandan government organised, supplied and directed the M23 rebel group with the aim of spawning an autonomous federal state.
READ: Kigali now fights back, frustrated by accusations
"There has been speculation over whether Rwandan involvement was driven by security interests, or its economic interests, or ethnic/cultural ties. But a federal state for Eastern Congo would encapsulate all of these issues," he said in his testimony.
Mr Hege predicted that the M23 rebellion is likely to continue until Rwanda achieves this objective. "Rwanda is determined to win. The costs are already too high for Kigali to settle for anything less now," he said.
The fresh claims came as talks between the rebels and DRC President Joseph Kabila's government in Kampala got off with a spate of accusations and counter-accusations that underlined the deep mistrust between the two sides.
René Abandi Munyarugerero, M23's head of foreign affairs and regional co-operation, who has been engaged in informal talks on the part of the rebels for the past four months, told The EastAfrican in Kampala: "We would like these talks to be different."
M23 were the first to boycott a session on the grounds that they didn't want to listen to the government's response to their opening statement, in which they accused it of "poor governance characterised by the lack of visionary leadership."
ALSO READ: M23 rebels accuse Kabila of planning offensive
Although the two sides managed to overcome this false start at the urging of Dr Crispus Kiyonga, Uganda's Minister of Defence, and concluded the ground rules and agenda behind closed doors on Thursday December 13, the next contest was expected over the rebels' 21 demands.
The demands were formally presented in July to Uganda's President Yoweri Museveni, the chair of the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region, under whose auspices the talks are taking place.
Several of these demands, apparently including one calling for the setting up of shopping centres and supermarkets in Eastern DRC, are not contained in the March 23, 2009 agreement which integrated the rebels into government before they mutinied in April this year, citing Kinshasa's failure to fully implement it.
"There is a divergence of views within M23," a communication analyst in Goma told The EastAfrican.
"When you listen to the chairman of M23 Bishop Jean-Marie Runiga, you don't understand what they are about. But when you hear [Col Sultani Makenga, the head of the military high command] you get a clear direction of what this group is about."
Jason Stearns, a researcher on Eastern DRC, told The EastAfrican in an earlier interview M23's ultimate goal is unknown. "At different times, they have said they want to negotiate their reintegration, but internally their rhetoric suggests they want secession or to march on Kinshasa," said Mr Stearns.
Of all the new demands, the one that is mostly likely to break the talks is the rebels' claim that President Kabila rigged the November 2011 election and so it should be reviewed and that the Electoral Commission be disbanded.
Although a review of the Commission is already underway, this demand is unlikely to be entertained by regional leaders who endorsed Kabila by ordering M23 "to stop talk of overthrowing an elected government."
Meanwhile, observes said the rebels' tactical advantage has been strengthened by their withdrawal from Goma, which they captured on November 20 and held for 11 days.
READ: Kabila, Kagame fly in for talks as Goma falls
They have camped in the Kanyaruchinya hills overlooking the city as the ground of tactical importance of their choice, which the regional leaders allowed them to select when they ordered them out of Goma in their November 26 communiqué.
With the weapons they took from the Congolese army and armoury, security analysts The EastAfrican spoke to in Goma say this position gives them the ability to overrun the capital of North Kivu at will.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

UK and US in Africa Great Lakes: A Strategy Built on Sand

  A Strategy Built on Sand: How Western Military Support for Rwanda and Uganda. Fuelled Authoritarianism and Prolonged Conflict in the African Great Lakes Region.   Introduction: The Logic That Failed For more than three decades, the United States and the United Kingdom have invested heavily in building what they hoped would be stable, capable, and pro-Western security partners in the African Great Lakes Region. Rwanda and Uganda were the centrepiece of this strategy. Both governments received billions of dollars in financial assistance, advanced military training, logistical support, and sophisticated equipment. Both were celebrated in Western capitals as models of governance, post-conflict reconstruction, and economic development. That strategy has failed — comprehensively and consequentially. What the United States and United Kingdom created were not pillars of regional stability. They created highly militarised, authoritaria...

L'UE doit être transparente concernant la guerre dans l'est de la RDC: Double Standard et Impunité du Rwanda

L'UE doit être transparente concernant la guerre dans l'est de la RDC : Double Standard et Impunité du Rwanda L'Union européenne se présente comme la défenseure mondiale du droit international, des droits humains et de l'ordre fondé sur des règles. Dans l'est de la République démocratique du Congo, cette réputation est mise à l'épreuve de manière sérieuse et soutenue. Tandis que l'armée rwandaise et sa force supplante, le M23, progressent à travers le Nord-Kivu et le Sud-Kivu, déplaçant des millions de personnes et démanteléant la souveraineté congolaise, Bruxelles a répondu par des térgiversàtions diplomatiques, des communiqués ambigus et un refus délibéré de nommer l'agresseur. Ce silence n'est pas de la neutralité. C'est de la complicité. Et dans le cas des paiements de la Facilité européenne pour la paix versés directement à l'armée rwandaise — désormais sanctionnée — c'est une complicité assortie d'un montant chif...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute