Skip to main content

Rwanda: Political prisoner Ingabire files an appeal to the Supreme Court.

 

Rwanda: Political prisoner Ingabire files an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Kigali 17 December 2012
 
 FDU-Inkingi Chair, Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza sentenced on 30 October 2012 to 8-year prison term by the Kigali High Court on politically motivated charges, has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of Rwanda. The notice of appeal  was given to the court clerk today and no docket fee was demanded. The appellant will be  represented by Batonnier Gatera Gashabana and Barrister Iain Edwards.
Her decision to appeal does not condone the flawed politicized judiciary under the hood of the dictatorship and absence of rule of law but only paves the way to future referral to international, regional or continental jurisdictions and/or international Human Rights courts basing their grounds, merits and eligibility criteria on the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies.
The High Court convicted Ingabire on two counts of Genocide denial, and conspiracy and planning to cause state insecurity, and was acquitted of four other charges that included genocide ideology, promoting ethnic divisionism and supporting armed groups.
The High Court judgement RP 0081/0110/10/HC/KIG/2011 of 30 October 2012 directed a period of 30 days for the appeal, but the political prisoner Madame Victoire Ingabire was only served with notification by the clerk of court via the Kigali maximum prison only on 29 November 2012. Article 149, sub-paragraph 4 of the Rwandan code of civil, commercial, social and administrative procedures stipulates that the defendant or his attorneys absent during the public ruling shall be served with notification by the clerk; the appeal period starts immediately upon an official issue of a copy of the judgement. Article 163 gives then a 30-day appeal period.
 
The National Public Prosecution Authority filed its own appeal on case on 29 November 2012 requesting anew life sentence for the opposition leader.
Some key points in the appeal against this kangaroo process highlight the main defaults: failure to ensure that evidence was properly handled; preparation and rehearsals of prosecutor's witnesses; lack of due process; denial of constitutional rights to free speech, political and civil rights; allegations of tortures and intimidation; sentencing not based on criminal articles and grounds  brought up by the prosecutor's case at any of the stages of the trial; interferences of president Paul Kagame and his government; mishandling of documents from the Netherlands and violation of the agreement relating to the rogatory letters; non retroactivity of the criminal law and lack of jurisdiction of the High Court on those trumped up charges.
 
FDU-Inkingi Coordinating committee
Dr. Nkiko Nsengimana
Coordinator
Tel. +41799593728

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute