Skip to main content

Rwanda: Political prisoner Ingabire files an appeal to the Supreme Court.

 

Rwanda: Political prisoner Ingabire files an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Kigali 17 December 2012
 
 FDU-Inkingi Chair, Madame Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza sentenced on 30 October 2012 to 8-year prison term by the Kigali High Court on politically motivated charges, has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of Rwanda. The notice of appeal  was given to the court clerk today and no docket fee was demanded. The appellant will be  represented by Batonnier Gatera Gashabana and Barrister Iain Edwards.
Her decision to appeal does not condone the flawed politicized judiciary under the hood of the dictatorship and absence of rule of law but only paves the way to future referral to international, regional or continental jurisdictions and/or international Human Rights courts basing their grounds, merits and eligibility criteria on the rule of exhaustion of domestic remedies.
The High Court convicted Ingabire on two counts of Genocide denial, and conspiracy and planning to cause state insecurity, and was acquitted of four other charges that included genocide ideology, promoting ethnic divisionism and supporting armed groups.
The High Court judgement RP 0081/0110/10/HC/KIG/2011 of 30 October 2012 directed a period of 30 days for the appeal, but the political prisoner Madame Victoire Ingabire was only served with notification by the clerk of court via the Kigali maximum prison only on 29 November 2012. Article 149, sub-paragraph 4 of the Rwandan code of civil, commercial, social and administrative procedures stipulates that the defendant or his attorneys absent during the public ruling shall be served with notification by the clerk; the appeal period starts immediately upon an official issue of a copy of the judgement. Article 163 gives then a 30-day appeal period.
 
The National Public Prosecution Authority filed its own appeal on case on 29 November 2012 requesting anew life sentence for the opposition leader.
Some key points in the appeal against this kangaroo process highlight the main defaults: failure to ensure that evidence was properly handled; preparation and rehearsals of prosecutor's witnesses; lack of due process; denial of constitutional rights to free speech, political and civil rights; allegations of tortures and intimidation; sentencing not based on criminal articles and grounds  brought up by the prosecutor's case at any of the stages of the trial; interferences of president Paul Kagame and his government; mishandling of documents from the Netherlands and violation of the agreement relating to the rogatory letters; non retroactivity of the criminal law and lack of jurisdiction of the High Court on those trumped up charges.
 
FDU-Inkingi Coordinating committee
Dr. Nkiko Nsengimana
Coordinator
Tel. +41799593728

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute