Skip to main content

DRC's M23 call for Zuma's help

DRC's M23 call for Zuma's help

Mmanaled Mataboge
 
If peace is what President Jacob Zuma genuinely wants, then he should pull South African troops from the UN mission in the DRC, say the M23 rebels.
M23 rebels in the DRC. (AFP)
M23 rebels in the DRC. (AFP)
President Jacob Zuma must pull his troops out of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) if he's interested in helping bring peace in the eastern part of that country. That's a plea by DRC rebels M23 as Zuma begins a two-day state visit to his counterpart Joseph Kabila in the capital Kinshasa on Tuesday.
Zuma arrived in Kinshasa on Monday just days after the collapse of peace talks that were held in Uganda's capital Kampala and fresh fighting erupted in several areas of the North Kivu province. Kabila's government refused to sign the peace deal unless M23 removed its deputy negotiation chief, Roger Lumbala, a former MP. The M23's refusal to give in resulted in the government delegation staging a walk-out.
Zuma and Kabila are scheduled to discuss economic, political and security co-operation, but the conflict in the east is likely to overshadow all other points of discussion.
"We're requesting Zuma to speak to Kabila to stop the fatalities," said M23 spokesperson Lawrence Kingston in an interview with the Mail & Guardian.
"South Africa should stop sending military to Congo. He's got to help the Congolese people live side by side in peace instead of helping Kabila kill them."
South Africa sent troops to the DRC earlier in the year as part of the United Nations mission to neutralise armed groups in the country.
Peacekeeping
South Africa is deeply involved in the conflict by virtue of being one of the longest serving countries in the UN peacekeeping mission Monusco and the country is now the backbone of the Southern African Development Community intervention brigade that's been authorised to use force to neutralise the M23.
After the collapse of Kampala talks, the DRC's government army FARDC re-launched attacks on M23 strongholds in Kibati, Kibumba and Kiwanja areas in North Kivu province.
M23 promised to retaliate should an attack on their positions continue.
"If you give South Africans helicopters to come and fight here I'm telling you we're not going to let ourselves be killed again," Kingston said.
"What's the point of continuing talking [peace talks] when our people are being killed? Don't tell us to lay down arms and then kills us when we're busy with talks."
M23 abandoned the movement's headquarters of Bunagana on Monday night and FARDC also took control of Kibumba.
On its Twitter account, M23 signalled that they're ready to fight back, saying they have now converged in the Virunga Mountains that are difficult to reach even with military tanks.
The Virunga Mountains are in a national park bordering Rwanda.
Economic benefits
M23 has always maintained that countries such as South Africa that take part in peace-building in the DRC are mainly interested in the economic benefits, such as investments in the country's minerals instead of finding the root causes of the conflict and finding a lasting solution.
South Africa's business interests have been growing rapidly in the DRC since the two countries signed a general co-operation agreement in 2004.
For this state visit, the two presidents are expected to sign a treaty on the Grand Inga Project, a hydro-electric project expected to be the largest in Africa with a capacity to power half of the continent. The DRC has got vast water resources in addition to coltan, gold, diamonds, tin, copper, cobalt and oil.
Zuma is accompanied by a high-level delegation of ministers and businesspeople on his trip to the DRC.
In Kinshasa, International Relations and Co-operation Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane has already called on both the M23 and the Congolese government to return to the negotiating table. 

Mmanaledi Mataboge is senior politics reporter for the Mail & Guardian.
 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute