Skip to main content

DRC's M23 call for Zuma's help

DRC's M23 call for Zuma's help

Mmanaled Mataboge
 
If peace is what President Jacob Zuma genuinely wants, then he should pull South African troops from the UN mission in the DRC, say the M23 rebels.
M23 rebels in the DRC. (AFP)
M23 rebels in the DRC. (AFP)
President Jacob Zuma must pull his troops out of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) if he's interested in helping bring peace in the eastern part of that country. That's a plea by DRC rebels M23 as Zuma begins a two-day state visit to his counterpart Joseph Kabila in the capital Kinshasa on Tuesday.
Zuma arrived in Kinshasa on Monday just days after the collapse of peace talks that were held in Uganda's capital Kampala and fresh fighting erupted in several areas of the North Kivu province. Kabila's government refused to sign the peace deal unless M23 removed its deputy negotiation chief, Roger Lumbala, a former MP. The M23's refusal to give in resulted in the government delegation staging a walk-out.
Zuma and Kabila are scheduled to discuss economic, political and security co-operation, but the conflict in the east is likely to overshadow all other points of discussion.
"We're requesting Zuma to speak to Kabila to stop the fatalities," said M23 spokesperson Lawrence Kingston in an interview with the Mail & Guardian.
"South Africa should stop sending military to Congo. He's got to help the Congolese people live side by side in peace instead of helping Kabila kill them."
South Africa sent troops to the DRC earlier in the year as part of the United Nations mission to neutralise armed groups in the country.
Peacekeeping
South Africa is deeply involved in the conflict by virtue of being one of the longest serving countries in the UN peacekeeping mission Monusco and the country is now the backbone of the Southern African Development Community intervention brigade that's been authorised to use force to neutralise the M23.
After the collapse of Kampala talks, the DRC's government army FARDC re-launched attacks on M23 strongholds in Kibati, Kibumba and Kiwanja areas in North Kivu province.
M23 promised to retaliate should an attack on their positions continue.
"If you give South Africans helicopters to come and fight here I'm telling you we're not going to let ourselves be killed again," Kingston said.
"What's the point of continuing talking [peace talks] when our people are being killed? Don't tell us to lay down arms and then kills us when we're busy with talks."
M23 abandoned the movement's headquarters of Bunagana on Monday night and FARDC also took control of Kibumba.
On its Twitter account, M23 signalled that they're ready to fight back, saying they have now converged in the Virunga Mountains that are difficult to reach even with military tanks.
The Virunga Mountains are in a national park bordering Rwanda.
Economic benefits
M23 has always maintained that countries such as South Africa that take part in peace-building in the DRC are mainly interested in the economic benefits, such as investments in the country's minerals instead of finding the root causes of the conflict and finding a lasting solution.
South Africa's business interests have been growing rapidly in the DRC since the two countries signed a general co-operation agreement in 2004.
For this state visit, the two presidents are expected to sign a treaty on the Grand Inga Project, a hydro-electric project expected to be the largest in Africa with a capacity to power half of the continent. The DRC has got vast water resources in addition to coltan, gold, diamonds, tin, copper, cobalt and oil.
Zuma is accompanied by a high-level delegation of ministers and businesspeople on his trip to the DRC.
In Kinshasa, International Relations and Co-operation Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane has already called on both the M23 and the Congolese government to return to the negotiating table. 

Mmanaledi Mataboge is senior politics reporter for the Mail & Guardian.
 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute