Skip to main content

Kenya's Chief Justice Willy Mutunga 'threatened' over Kenyatta case

 

Kenya's Willy Mutunga 'threatened' over Kenyatta case

Uhuru Kenyatta (right), addresses supporters beside running mate William Ruto during a political rally in Nairobi on 13 February 2013
Uhuru Kenyatta (right) is one of the frontrunners in the presidential poll
Kenya's Chief Justice Willy Mutunga says he has been threatened with "dire consequences" if the courts barred presidential candidate Uhuru Kenyatta from contesting next month's election.
Mr Mutunga said he had received a "poison-pen letter" from an outlawed group "extolling" violence.
Mr Kenyatta's Jubilee Coalition said it condemned any threats to the judiciary.
His candidacy has been controversial because he has been charged with crimes against humanity.
The case at the International Criminal Court (ICC) stems from allegations that Mr Kenyatta fuelled violence that followed the disputed 2007 presidential election.
He denies the allegation.

"Start Quote

Recourse to sensationalism and melodrama is not befitting of the head of the judiciary"
End Quote Jasper Mbiuki Jubilee Coalition official
Mr Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto are due to be tried at The Hague about a month after the 4 March election.
Pressure groups asked Kenya's High Court to disqualify them from contesting the election because of the ICC case.
But the High Court refused, in a ruling on Friday.
It did not have the power to annul Mr Kenyatta's candidacy, the court said.
More than 1,000 people died in the violence which swept through Kenya after the 2007 election.
The violence ended after a coalition government was formed.
Mr Kenyatta and Prime Minister Raila Odinga are the frontrunners in next month's election.
'Cabal of retrogrades'
President Mwai Kibaki is stepping down after two terms in office.
A protester next to a burning barricade in Kisumu, Kenya on 20 January 2013 Kenyans have been urged to avoid violence in next month's election
Mr Mutunga said he had received the "poison-pen letter from the Mungiki Veterans Group/Kenya Sovereignty Defence Squad", a banned group which was heavily involved in violence after the 2007 poll.
"It warns against an adversarial ruling on the presidential and deputy presidential candidacy of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto," Mr Mutunga said, at a news conference in Nairobi.
"The letter extols the violent 'exploits' of the Mungiki movement and threatens dire consequences."
Jubilee Coalition legal affairs secretary Jasper Mbiuki said his organisation was saddened that Mr Mutunga had "dragged our name into this sordid affair on such flimsy [evidence]".
The Jubilee Coalition was not linked to Mungiki, he said.

"Start Quote

Willy Mutunga, Kenya's chief justice
Let no individual, group, candidate, or supporter imagine that cowardly and darkly acts such as these will cow us"
End Quote Willy Mutunga Kenya's chief justice
"As a judicial officer, he must surely know that a letter allegedly written by alleged supporters of our candidates would have no evidentiary value and no court would admit it into evidence," Mr Mbiuki said, in a statement.
"Recourse to sensationalism and melodrama is not befitting of the head of the judiciary."
Mr Mutunga said five judges had been attacked ahead of the election.
He also faced an illegal attempt by an immigration officer at the airport in Nairobi last week to block him from flying to neighbouring Tanzania, he said.
"It requires some courage, ignorance, or political patronage or a combination of all three to stop a chief justice from travelling," Mr Mutunga added.
Intelligence chief Maj-Gen Michael Gichangi later phoned to apologise for what he called a "small hiccup", Mr Mutunga said.
"It has never happened on any of my numerous previous trips," he said.
"I have, therefore, concluded that this is deliberate harassment... I am convinced it is political."
Mr Mutunga said judges would not be held hostage by a "cabal of retrogrades".
"We shall decide all cases independently and with scrupulous fidelity to the constitution," he added.
"Let no individual, group, candidate, or supporter imagine that cowardly and darkly acts such as these will cow us."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute