Skip to main content

Kenya's Chief Justice Willy Mutunga 'threatened' over Kenyatta case

 

Kenya's Willy Mutunga 'threatened' over Kenyatta case

Uhuru Kenyatta (right), addresses supporters beside running mate William Ruto during a political rally in Nairobi on 13 February 2013
Uhuru Kenyatta (right) is one of the frontrunners in the presidential poll
Kenya's Chief Justice Willy Mutunga says he has been threatened with "dire consequences" if the courts barred presidential candidate Uhuru Kenyatta from contesting next month's election.
Mr Mutunga said he had received a "poison-pen letter" from an outlawed group "extolling" violence.
Mr Kenyatta's Jubilee Coalition said it condemned any threats to the judiciary.
His candidacy has been controversial because he has been charged with crimes against humanity.
The case at the International Criminal Court (ICC) stems from allegations that Mr Kenyatta fuelled violence that followed the disputed 2007 presidential election.
He denies the allegation.

"Start Quote

Recourse to sensationalism and melodrama is not befitting of the head of the judiciary"
End Quote Jasper Mbiuki Jubilee Coalition official
Mr Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto are due to be tried at The Hague about a month after the 4 March election.
Pressure groups asked Kenya's High Court to disqualify them from contesting the election because of the ICC case.
But the High Court refused, in a ruling on Friday.
It did not have the power to annul Mr Kenyatta's candidacy, the court said.
More than 1,000 people died in the violence which swept through Kenya after the 2007 election.
The violence ended after a coalition government was formed.
Mr Kenyatta and Prime Minister Raila Odinga are the frontrunners in next month's election.
'Cabal of retrogrades'
President Mwai Kibaki is stepping down after two terms in office.
A protester next to a burning barricade in Kisumu, Kenya on 20 January 2013 Kenyans have been urged to avoid violence in next month's election
Mr Mutunga said he had received the "poison-pen letter from the Mungiki Veterans Group/Kenya Sovereignty Defence Squad", a banned group which was heavily involved in violence after the 2007 poll.
"It warns against an adversarial ruling on the presidential and deputy presidential candidacy of Uhuru Kenyatta and William Ruto," Mr Mutunga said, at a news conference in Nairobi.
"The letter extols the violent 'exploits' of the Mungiki movement and threatens dire consequences."
Jubilee Coalition legal affairs secretary Jasper Mbiuki said his organisation was saddened that Mr Mutunga had "dragged our name into this sordid affair on such flimsy [evidence]".
The Jubilee Coalition was not linked to Mungiki, he said.

"Start Quote

Willy Mutunga, Kenya's chief justice
Let no individual, group, candidate, or supporter imagine that cowardly and darkly acts such as these will cow us"
End Quote Willy Mutunga Kenya's chief justice
"As a judicial officer, he must surely know that a letter allegedly written by alleged supporters of our candidates would have no evidentiary value and no court would admit it into evidence," Mr Mbiuki said, in a statement.
"Recourse to sensationalism and melodrama is not befitting of the head of the judiciary."
Mr Mutunga said five judges had been attacked ahead of the election.
He also faced an illegal attempt by an immigration officer at the airport in Nairobi last week to block him from flying to neighbouring Tanzania, he said.
"It requires some courage, ignorance, or political patronage or a combination of all three to stop a chief justice from travelling," Mr Mutunga added.
Intelligence chief Maj-Gen Michael Gichangi later phoned to apologise for what he called a "small hiccup", Mr Mutunga said.
"It has never happened on any of my numerous previous trips," he said.
"I have, therefore, concluded that this is deliberate harassment... I am convinced it is political."
Mr Mutunga said judges would not be held hostage by a "cabal of retrogrades".
"We shall decide all cases independently and with scrupulous fidelity to the constitution," he added.
"Let no individual, group, candidate, or supporter imagine that cowardly and darkly acts such as these will cow us."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'Å“uvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute