Skip to main content

Rwanda adjusts budget, cuts spending by $99m - News - www.theeastafrican.co.ke


Rwanda adjusts budget, cuts spending by $99m

By JOHN GAHAMANYI The EastAfrican

Posted  Saturday, February 16  2013 at  18:09
IN SUMMARY

This is part of the government's austerity measures aimed at realigning the country's spending with available financing after development partners suspended or withheld aid to Rwanda.
 
Rwanda has reduced its spending by more than $99 million, freezing recruitment of public sector workers and slowing implementation of some projects, as it deals with the prolonged suspension of aid by some donors.

Jobless Rwandans are the biggest losers in a supplementary budget approved by Parliament last week, which seeks to sharply cut public spending in the wake of revenue shortfalls and rising expenditure.

Treasury will reduce spending on public sector wages by Rwf14 billion ($22 million) while the development budget will be cut by Rwf18 billion ($28.4 million).

This is part of the government's austerity measures aimed at realigning the country's spending with available financing after development partners suspended or withheld aid to Rwanda.

Reduced development budget

Finance Minister John Rwangombwa said implementation of on-going projects will be slowed down, except for local government, agriculture and infrastructure projects due to their impact on the country's development and poverty reduction.

The development budget was cut by Rwf18 billion ($28.4 billion).

"We're cutting the original financing we were supposed to get from the suspended aid of Rwf54.4 billion ($85.9 million), and we are making changes in our receipts from the peacekeeping operations that we had overestimated from the beginning. These cuts in resources automatically lead to cuts in expenditure," Mr Rwangombwa said.

He said Treasury had overestimated its costs from peacekeeping operations by Rwf14 billion ($22 million). Rwanda has peacekeepers in several countries, among them Sudan, South Sudan and Haiti.

Economists say the impact of spending cuts will trickle down to the private sector, because government is still the major investor and buyer of goods and services.

"If some of the projects the government planned to execute are affected by aid suspension, incomes of the private sector will be affected, and certainly the ability of the private sector to employ more people and to produce more goods and services will be affected," said Eric Rutabana, chief investment officer of Business Partners Rwanda.

Since the government is the biggest single employer, business executives believe spending cuts will hurt employment and reduce demand for goods and services thus slowing down overall economic activity.

"There will be an effect on employment, but these are short term measures to mitigate the impact of aid suspension," said Sanjeev Anand, the managing director of Rwanda Commercial Bank.

Government spending will reduce by Rwf62.4 billion ($99 million) although the overall budget will rise to Rwf1.54 trillion ($2.5 billion) from Rwf1.38 trillion ($2.1 billion) stemming from planned borrowing to finance RwandAir and the Kigali Convention Centre.

Treasury will be seeking to borrow Rwf227 billion ($350 million) through the issuance of a sovereign bond, to pay off loans that were acquired to finance the national airline as well as support the completion of the conference centre.

To bridge its funding shortfall, the government will increase its borrowing from the domestic debt market from Rwf8 billion ($12.6 million) that was earlier planned to Rwf20 billion ($31.6 million).

Analysts warned the government to be cautious when borrowing from the local market to avoid competing for resources with the private sector. Mr Rwangombwa said the government has taken such risks into consideration.

"If we didn't take that into consideration we would have borrowed to finance the entire budget we had," he said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute