Skip to main content

Good Riddance to Ntaganda, Now What? | PRLog


Good Riddance to Ntaganda, Now What?


M23 leader Bosco Ntaganda surrendered at the US Embassy in Kigali on Monday. Ntaganda, called "the Terminator" for his war crimes in the Congo, is the latest in a long line of Rwandans & Rwandan backed rebels fighting for control in eastern Congo.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release) – Mar 19, 2013 – Contact: Kitty Kurth 
Phone: 312-617-7288 
Email: kitty@kurthlampe.com

Good Riddance to Ntaganda, Now What? 

The surrender of former M23 leader Bosco Ntaganda at the US Embassy in Kigali on Monday is excellent news for justice in the Congo. Ntaganda, who holds the terrible nickname of "the Terminator" for his horrific war crimes in the Congo, is one of the latest in a long line of Rwandans and Rwandan supported rebel leaders fighting for control in the eastern Congo. The fact that he turned himself over to the United States government, requesting a transfer to the International Criminal Court (ICC) where he will be tried on numerous charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity, is both good and significant news. The United States should fulfill this request to be moved to the ICC as soon as possible.

Paul Rusesabagina, President of the Hotel Rwanda Rusesabagina Foundation (http://www.hrrfoundation.org) said, "Good riddance to General Ntaganda.  But the question is what next for the conflict in the Congo? Which rebel leader will Rwanda prop up next - Nkunda, then Ntaganda, then who? How did this bad guy move freely across Rwanda and straight in to the American Embassy in Kigali? The surrender raises as many questions as it answers. Hopefully, the M23 will stop killing innocent people.  But, when will Rwanda stop sending killers in to the Congo?"  

Past "rebel" leaders supported by Paul Kagame's Rwanda have quietly left the public scene when their actions in Congo became too embarrassing for the Rwandan government. This includes Ntaganda's predecessor, indicted war criminal Laurent Nkunda, who is still under "house arrest" while walking free in Kigali. Rwanda's pattern in the region is well-established by the international community. They support a "rebel" movement, not really rebelling against the Congolese government, but rather seeking control of the eastern Congo to funnel illegal resources to Rwanda. At times however, violence escalates in the Congo to the point where Rwanda is publicly embarrassed by their militias. When this happens, it is not unusual for a militia leader to disappear back across the border into Rwanda until the uproar dies away, and then be quietly replaced with a new leader more complacent to Rwandan government commands, and less embarrassing to the regime there. This is what has been happening over the last few weeks in the Congo, with public infighting among the Rwandan-backed M23 group, leading to Ntaganda and others fleeing back to Rwanda.

In this case though, it seems that something went wrong. The United Nations reported recently that M23 and Ntaganda were taking commands directly from Rwandan Defense Minister James Kabarebe, a charge denied by the Rwandan government. But if Ntaganda turned himself over the UN, and specifically asked to be sent to the ICC, then it seems he has had a falling out with his former commanders.

Rusesabagina continued, "Ntaganda's surrender provides an excellent opportunity for the truth to come out about Rwandan support of M23 and of the overall crisis in the Congo, which has now killed more than seven million people. The United States government must not give in to likely Rwandan requests that Ntaganda be transferred back to them. Rather the war criminal's own request for international justice should be fulfilled. In that way, his trial may be able to bring the truth to light about what is really happening in the Congo, away from the control of governments in the region. This is an opportunity for a major step forward for truth and justice, and it must not be missed."

--- End ---     Visit Press Room

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute