Skip to main content

Warlord Bosco Ntaganda surrenders to U.S. embassy in Rwanda


Warlord Bosco Ntaganda surrenders to U.S. embassy in Rwanda

JOHANNESBURG — THE GLOBE AND MAIL

General Bosco Ntaganda addresses a news conference in Kabati, a village located in Congo's eastern North Kivu province, January 8, 2009. A dissident commander who is challenging General Laurent Nkunda's leadership of Congo's Tutsi rebels said on Thursday Nkunda was obstructing efforts to achieve peace in the country's war-ravaged east. (© STR New / Reuters/REUTERS)



For years, the war-crimes fugitive known as "The Terminator" was so supremely confident that he played tennis at a luxury hotel near the Congo-Rwanda border, flaunting his freedom while United Nations peacekeepers drove past.

So it was perhaps in keeping with his style that the fugitive, Bosco Ntaganda, chose the moment of his surrender. Rather than suffering an undignified arrest, he walked through the gates of the U.S. embassy in Rwanda's capital on Monday, announced his surrender and demanded to be taken to the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

It was just the latest dramatic twist in the saga of the notorious rebel commander and accused war criminal who has enjoyed protection from powerful figures on both sides of the border in the war-torn region. But if he is finally sent to the ICC, it will be a major victory for justice in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and potentially a step toward peace in the region.

His surrender is linked to a split in the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel movement in eastern Congo last month.

He was on the losing side in the internal clashes and may have feared retribution from the rebels and from Rwanda's military. So he drove for more than two hours from Congo's eastern border to reach Kigali and the U.S. embassy.

Mr. Ntaganda is an elusive and mysterious man, rarely photographed and reputed to be heavily involved in the lucrative trade in Congo's smuggled minerals.

In a brutal 20-year career,

he fought for rebel militias

and national armies, shifting with the winds of power, and allegedly orchestrating a range of atrocities, including massacres, rapes, sexual slavery and the recruitment of child soldiers.

He was indicted by the international court in 2006 for war crimes and crimes against humanity, yet remained at large for the past seven years.

He led his militia into a merger with Congo's army in a 2009 peace deal, remaining inside the army for three years until defecting last year to help form the M23 militia, which soon pushed the army out of much of eastern Congo.

An investigation by UN experts concluded he was under the direct military command of Rwanda's defence minister, James Kabarebe. The investigation found that Rwanda gave crucial military support to Mr. Ntaganda and other rebels in eastern Congo, allowing them to seize a huge swath of territory and capture the strategic border city of Goma last year.

His surrender on Monday could make it easier for the remaining M23 rebels to negotiate a peace deal with Congo's government. Congolese officials welcomed his surrender and Rwanda too may have been complicit in it.

The news of his surrender was first revealed in a tweet on Monday by Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo, before the United States even confirmed it. The United States is not a signatory to the International Criminal Court, but its diplomats promised to ensure that Mr. Ntaganda is transferred to The Hague.

"We strongly support the work that the ICC is doing to investigate the atrocities committed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," said U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique.

Le Troisième Mandat de Louise Mushikiwabo à l'OIF : Entre Précédent et Principe Démocratique. L'Alternance à l'OIF : Pourquoi un Troisième Mandat Fragilise la Crédibilité de la Francophonie. Introduction Louise Mushikiwabo veut un troisième mandat à la tête de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Son annonce, faite bien avant l'émergence d'autres candidats, rappelle une tactique familière en Afrique : affirmer qu'on a le soutien populaire sans jamais le prouver publiquement. La méthode est rodée. Des dirigeants africains l'utilisent depuis des décennies pour prolonger leur règne. Ils clament que "le peuple le demande" ou que "les partenaires soutiennent" cette reconduction. Aucune preuve formelle n'est nécessaire. L'affirmation devient réalité politique. Mais voilà le problème : la Francophonie prêche la démocratie, l'État de droit et l'alternance au pouvoir. Peut-elle tolérer en son sein ce qu...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute