Skip to main content

Steep rise in Rwanda’s public debt worries MPs


Steep rise in Rwanda's public debt worries MPs

SHARE BOOKMARKPRINTRATING
By EMMANUEL RUTAYISIRE Special Correspondent

Posted  Saturday, March 9  2013 at  20:18
IN SUMMARY
  • The loans are meant to finance small and medium enterprises in the agricultural sector and electricity rollout in rural Rwanda.
  • Rwanda's SME segment has been exhibiting a high appetite for investment capital over the past couple of years even as most local financial institutions continue to shun it, considering it a high-risk area.
Rwanda's recent aggressive borrowing saw lawmakers raising concerns last week over the surge in the country's cost of debt hurting the economy, which is also facing pressures from global economic uncertainties and aid suspensions.
Minister of Finance and Economic Planning Claver Gatete faced tough questions from parliamentarians last week as he sought their approval for government to borrow $17 million.
The loans are meant to finance small and medium enterprises in the agricultural sector and electricity rollout in rural Rwanda.
Parliament ultimately endorsed the government decision to borrow $5 million from Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa for Rwanda Development Bank to lend to farmers while the rest, $12 million, from Opec, is aimed at accelerating the rural electrification programme as well as boosting the capacity of power distributor EWASA.
Analysts view these as strategic decisions, particularly borrowing to finance SMEs, which account for 90 per cent of the businesses in Rwanda and 84 per cent of private sector employment.
Rwanda's SME segment has been exhibiting a high appetite for investment capital over the past couple of years even as most local financial institutions continue to shun it, considering it a high-risk area.
That's why such borrowing, aimed at improving medium and long-term financing for SMEs, is seen as a crucial long-term investment to support growth, job creation and economic output.
While the rural electrification programme is viewed as a social good, parliamentarians were concerned the country could sink into debt given the recent aggressive borrowing to fund other development needs.
Mr Gatete, who until two weeks ago was governor of the National Bank of Rwanda (BNR), requested parliamentarians to expedite the ratification of the two loan agreements, demonstrating the government's urgent need for money to fix the funding shortfall after some donors suspended or withheld aid to Rwanda.
"What is the national debt level? Do we still have the means to service these debts?" MP Jean Damscene Murara asked.
Mr Gatete has sought to allay MPs' fears, noting that with debt ratio of 22.9 per cent of GDP, excluding grants, the national debt is still below the ceiling government has agreed upon with the International Monetary Fund.
Rwanda's nominal GDP stood at Rwf4,437 billion ($6.7 billion) at the end of last year, meaning the country's debt levels stood at Rwf1,016.14 billion ($1.6 billion). The IMF says that roughly, a ratio of debt to GDP below 30 per cent is considered reasonable.
However, it is the pace at which the government is borrowing is what is worrying MPs and some economists.
Last week, Rwanda also secured $60 million from the World Bank and plans to borrow an extra $350 million through the issuance of a sovereign bond, to pay off loans that were acquired to finance the national airline as well as support the completion of the conference centre.
To bridge its funding shortfall, the government will increase its borrowing from the domestic debt market from Rwf8 billion ($12.6 million) that was earlier planned to Rwf20 billion ($31.6 million).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions amĂ©ricaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni PubliĂ© en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusĂ© d'exĂ©cutions extrajudiciaires, de dĂ©placements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systĂ©matique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la rĂ©ponse diplomatique attendue est un dĂ©menti catĂ©gorique, Ă©tayĂ© par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le dĂ©partement amĂ©ricain du TrĂ©sor a imposĂ© des sanctions aux Forces de dĂ©fense rwandaises (FDR) et Ă  quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placĂ©s, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a dĂ©livrĂ© une dĂ©claration que les analystes diplomatiques Ă©tudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions Ă©taient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placĂ© le Rwanda lĂ -bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le dĂ©ploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dĂ©gâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   RĂ©sumĂ© exĂ©cutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de DĂ©fense du Rwanda (RDF), imposĂ©es par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayĂ©es par une pression croissante de l'Union europĂ©enne, ont mis Ă  nu une contradiction stratĂ©gique de premier ordre. La mĂŞme force militaire sanctionnĂ©e pour son soutien opĂ©rationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en RĂ©publique dĂ©mocratique du Congo est simultanĂ©ment le principal garant sĂ©curitaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquĂ©fiĂ© (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploitĂ© par le gĂ©ant français TotalEnergies Ă  Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse rĂ©pond Ă  trois questions interconnectĂ©es dont les rĂ©ponses dĂ©finissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute