Skip to main content

[AfricaWatch] Rwanda: Justice Progress after Genocide | Human Rights Watch

 


National, International Courts Played Vital Role; Challenges Remain
MARCH 28, 2014

The Rwandan genocide was one of the most terrifying episodes of targeted ethnic violence in recent world history. On the 20th anniversary of these horrific events, Human Rights Watch stands in solidarity with the victims and with those who survived.

Daniel Bekele, Africa director

(Nairobi) – Significant progress has been made in national and international courts to bring to justice those responsible for the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, Human Rights Watch said today in a briefing paper marking the 20th anniversary of the genocide.

The 20-page paper, "Justice After Genocide: 20 Years On," focuses on the achievements of courts in Rwanda, at the UN's International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and in other countries, to hold to account those who planned, ordered, and carried out the genocide.

"The Rwandan genocide was one of the most terrifying episodes of targeted ethnic violence in recent world history," said Daniel Bekele, Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "On the 20thanniversary of these horrific events, Human Rights Watch stands in solidarity with the victims and with those who survived."

Between April and July 1994, Hutu extremists in Rwanda carried out a genocideaimed at wiping out the Tutsi minority, killing more than a half million people in just three months.  Many Hutu who attempted to hide or defend Tutsi and those who opposed the genocide were also killed.

The briefing paper, based on Human Rights Watch field research and trial observation in Rwanda over many years, highlights the exceptional challenge of delivering justice in a country devastated by genocide. The Rwandan government embarked on an unprecedented and ambitious approach, using both conventional courts and community-based gacaca courts.

The briefing paper outlines the achievements as well as the flaws of Rwanda's conventional and gacaca courts, and the uneven standard of trials in both jurisdictions.

In the immediate aftermath of the genocide, in particular, conventional courts convicted numerous defendants after unfair trials. In more recent years, the government has carried out   a range of legal and institutional reforms that have improved respect for due process, but concerns remain about the judiciary's lack of independence.


Gacaca courts left a mixed legacy. The speed with which they processed almost two million cases was remarkable, and the participation of local communities across the country was important. However, many gacaca hearings resulted in unfair trials and were marred by intimidation, corruption, and flawed decision-making.

The briefing paper also takes stock of the work of the ICTR as it winds down in 2014, and describes a new momentum for prosecution of Rwandan genocide suspects by courts in foreign countries, as well as moves toward extraditing suspects to Rwanda.

In contrast with progress in genocide prosecutions, few members of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), the former rebel group that put an end to the genocide and is now the ruling party in Rwanda, have been prosecuted in Rwanda, and none by the ICTR.

"RPF troops killed tens of thousands of civilians as they took over the country in 1994," Bekele said. "These killings are not equivalent or comparable to the genocide, but they constituted war crimes and crimes against humanity, and the victims and their families have a right to see justice done."

Finally, the paper describes the lasting impact of the Rwandan genocide on neighboring Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the legacy of the shameful international failure to act to prevent the genocide in 1994.

"As the world's eyes turn to Rwanda once again, Rwanda and other countries should build on the achievements of the last 20 years in delivering justice for these terrible crimes," Bekele said. "They should keep up the efforts to arrest and prosecute, in fair and credible trials, others responsible for these crimes who are still at large."
 

The video's narrator, Alison Des Forges

Alison Des Forges was Human Rights Watch's senior advisor in the Africa Division and one of the world's foremost experts on Rwanda. In the period leading up to the genocide, she worked tirelessly to alert world powers to the impending crisis in Rwanda. Her efforts did not stop when the genocide ended. She continued painstakingly gathering information on these horrific crimes, which she compiled into what has become one of the main reference books on the Rwandan genocide: "Leave none to tell the story: Genocide in Rwanda", published in 1999.

Alison Des Forges campaigned vigorously for justice for the genocide until her sudden death in a plane crash in the US on February 12, 2009. She also documented human rights abuses by the new government of Rwanda after the genocide and advocated for accountability for all abuses, past and present.

Photo Essay by Corinne Dufka

Remembering Rwanda: The 20th Anniversary of the Genocide

VIEW GALLERY

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.
More News:http://changingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaWatch@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaWatch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaWatch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaWatch-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.

Sponsors:
http://www.datingwithoutborders.com
http://www.eyumbina.com
http://www.foraha.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Online Scholarships for Higher Education And Research (OSHEAR): http://www.oshear.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute