Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Congolese protesters demand cancelation of Soco oil permits

 

Congolese protesters demand cancelation of Soco oil permits

Posted on 27 March 2014 |

Goma, DRC - Over 50 protestors assembled peacefully in the street
Monday holding banners proclaiming "no to oil" in Virunga National
Park. UK company Soco International PLC says it will begin seismic
testing in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) World Heritage
Site next month.

Activists argue that oil exploitation could pose a threat to essential
fishing and agricultural jobs, and could enflame conflicts in eastern
DRC where peace has been achieved only recently.

Community groups appealed for greater investment to unlock the tourism
potential of Africa's most biodiverse protected area, home to
critically endangered mountain gorillas, as well as for assistance to
bolster the fishery and agricultural industries.

"Virunga National Park could be an engine for sustainable economic
development for the country and future generations," civil society
groups said in a written statement.

One woman who sells fish caught in Virunga's Lake Edward says her
business has enabled her to afford an education she otherwise could
not.

"We can't tolerate seeing oil activities destroying our source of
income," she said. "What will we become without Lake Edward?"

"I've joined the protest because I want to add my voice to those of
many of my brothers who live in fear regarding their future because of
the oil project in Virunga National Park," the fish-seller said.
Asked if she was concerned about speaking out publically in protest
she said, "I'm not afraid, because I defend my right- the right to a
healthy environment."

Police on the scene of Monday's protest ensured participants were able
to express safely their opposition to oil exploration in Virunga. The
event's organizers noted that threats against some anti-oil activists
have been recorded over the previous years.

A declaration issued at the protest complained that Soco did not
provide communities with a sufficient amount of information about the
risks of its operations, and that civil society views were not taken
into account.

"The free, prior and informed consent of communities affected by oil
activities in Virunga National Park has not been respected," according
to the written statement, which goes on to request the cancelation of
Soco's exploration permits.

STAND WITH VIRUNGA ACTIVISTS. TELL SOCO TO GET OUT NOW.

Photo: Women against oil exploration hold poster, "Our law guarantees
the protection of nature. And you?"
(c) Edgar Mbekemoja

http://awsassets.panda.org/img/march_24_protest_women_466246.jpg

http://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?uNewsID=218554&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wwf%2Fnews+%28WWF+-+News%29

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sponsors:

http://www.afriqueintimites.com; http://www.afriqueintimites.com;
http://www.eyumbina.com/; http://www.foraha.net/
-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute