Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Congolese protesters demand cancelation of Soco oil permits

 

Congolese protesters demand cancelation of Soco oil permits

Posted on 27 March 2014 |

Goma, DRC - Over 50 protestors assembled peacefully in the street
Monday holding banners proclaiming "no to oil" in Virunga National
Park. UK company Soco International PLC says it will begin seismic
testing in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) World Heritage
Site next month.

Activists argue that oil exploitation could pose a threat to essential
fishing and agricultural jobs, and could enflame conflicts in eastern
DRC where peace has been achieved only recently.

Community groups appealed for greater investment to unlock the tourism
potential of Africa's most biodiverse protected area, home to
critically endangered mountain gorillas, as well as for assistance to
bolster the fishery and agricultural industries.

"Virunga National Park could be an engine for sustainable economic
development for the country and future generations," civil society
groups said in a written statement.

One woman who sells fish caught in Virunga's Lake Edward says her
business has enabled her to afford an education she otherwise could
not.

"We can't tolerate seeing oil activities destroying our source of
income," she said. "What will we become without Lake Edward?"

"I've joined the protest because I want to add my voice to those of
many of my brothers who live in fear regarding their future because of
the oil project in Virunga National Park," the fish-seller said.
Asked if she was concerned about speaking out publically in protest
she said, "I'm not afraid, because I defend my right- the right to a
healthy environment."

Police on the scene of Monday's protest ensured participants were able
to express safely their opposition to oil exploration in Virunga. The
event's organizers noted that threats against some anti-oil activists
have been recorded over the previous years.

A declaration issued at the protest complained that Soco did not
provide communities with a sufficient amount of information about the
risks of its operations, and that civil society views were not taken
into account.

"The free, prior and informed consent of communities affected by oil
activities in Virunga National Park has not been respected," according
to the written statement, which goes on to request the cancelation of
Soco's exploration permits.

STAND WITH VIRUNGA ACTIVISTS. TELL SOCO TO GET OUT NOW.

Photo: Women against oil exploration hold poster, "Our law guarantees
the protection of nature. And you?"
(c) Edgar Mbekemoja

http://awsassets.panda.org/img/march_24_protest_women_466246.jpg

http://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?uNewsID=218554&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wwf%2Fnews+%28WWF+-+News%29

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sponsors:

http://www.afriqueintimites.com; http://www.afriqueintimites.com;
http://www.eyumbina.com/; http://www.foraha.net/
-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute