Skip to main content

[AfricaRealities] Osborne's plan to make 250,000 migrant workers pay tax

 

Osborne's plan to make 250,000 migrant workers pay tax


Comment:

But, most British migrants working in developing countries don't pay taxes in addition to capital flight.
  
---------------------------------------------------------------

Exclusive: Up to 250,000 migrant labourers in Britain could pay tax for the first time under plans being prepared by George Osborne

The Home Office spent £3 million on navy blue outfits for Border Force workers last year but now nearly 250 employees are bringing personal injury claims thought to run into hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Tax experts suggested the move would result in fewer migrants coming to Britain for temporary work. Photo: London News Pictures
Matthew Holehouse
By , Political Correspondent
11:20AM BST 12 Aug 2014
Up to a quarter of a million European migrants will pay tax in Britain for the first time, under plans being prepared by George Osborne, the Telegraph can reveal.
Temporary workers from the European Union will be stripped of the right to use the £10,000 tax-free personal allowance under Treasury proposals.
It means that up to 250,000 labourers, agricultural workers, cleaners and bar staff from the EU working in Britain who currently earn less than £10,000 will pay tax on their earnings for the first time.
It means that, in effect, they will earn 20 per cent less than their UK counterparts who will be able to keep all of their earnings below the personal allowance.
Tax experts suggested the move would result in fewer migrants coming to Britain for temporary work.
It will also create more administration for employers of temporary migrant labour, as they are likely to have to place temporary foreign workers on the payroll for the first time.
The plans to deny the personal allowance to people who are non-resident for tax purposes – meaning they are in Britain for less than six months of the year – were first revealed in the March Budget. Developed plans have now been released for consultation.
In total, up to 400,000 people could be affected, saving the Exchequer £400 million a year.
Other groups to be hit are likely to include those in receipt of Government pensions, and British expats who receive income from rental properties in Britain. An expat couple with a rental income of £20,000 a year could be £4,000 a year worse off.
The Treasury says the £10,000 personal allowance is one of the most generous in the developed world. Curtailing it to only those with a "strong economic connection" to Britain, and denying it to expats and non-resident European nationals, would bring the tax regime into line with the US, Canada and much of the EU.
Some 110,000 international professionals who work temporarily in Britain would also lose the right to the personal allowance. However, they are unlikely to be worse off overall, as they are likely to be able to reclaim the tax as a credit in their home countries.
By contast, many of the 250,000 migrant labourers would be worse off overall, as they are unlikely to earn enough in their home countries to pay tax and be entitled to a credit.
The plan follows a series of measures introduced by David Cameron to "put Britain first" and reduce the "magnetic pull" of the UK benefits system on European migrants.
Under plans announced last month, the length of time that migrants who have not made national insurance contributions will be allowed to claim Jobseekers' Allowance will be reduced from six months to three months.
Rules introduced in January, following the lifting of migration restrictions on Romanians and Bulgarians within the EU, means that migrants must wait three months before they claim out-of-work benefits.
New EU migrants are also unable to claim housing benefit if they are claiming unemployment benefits.
Many European workers travel to Britain for seasonal work for a few months of the year, particular in agriculture, before returning home with their earnings.
At present, an EU migrant in Britain temporarily working 40 hours a week at the minimum wage would earn £6,760 in six months, and keep it all under the personal tax allowance.
Withdrawing the personal allowance, and imposing tax at 20 per cent, would cut those earnings by £1,352.
Jackie Hall, a tax partner at Baker Tilly, said the tax changes could "reduce the numbers coming across to seek seasonal work."
"They will decide it's not sufficiently viable for them to do that and not come at all."
A Treasury spokesman said: "The increases the government has made to the personal allowance support hardworking people by helping them to keep more of the money they earn and, as a result, is one of the most generous in the world.
"At the same time, we believe that it is reasonable to consider whether non-residents who receive income from the UK are paying a fair share of tax on that income, in this country.
"The government is seeking views on whether it would be appropriate to restrict the personal allowance to those resident in the UK, or people who have most of their economic connections in the UK, as is the case in many other countries including most of the EU."

 



__._,_.___

Posted by: Afrika Watch <afrikawatch@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)

Yahoo Groups
Instantly Explore All Attachments Within Each Group Conversation
You can now explore files, preview and download photos directly within each conversation.

----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaRealities@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaRealities-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaRealities-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaRealities-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-http://www.africarealities.com/

-https://www.facebook.com/africarealities

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Paul Kagame: “We refuse to remove defensive measures"

Paul Kagame Refuses to Implement the Washington Accords and UN Security Council Resolution 2773: Analysis and Implications In an exclusive interview published on 3 April 2026, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda openly confirmed that Rwandan forces are deployed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, rejected calls for their withdrawal, dismissed US sanctions as illegitimate, and signalled clear satisfaction with the current military status quo. This briefing examines what Kagame said, what his remarks mean for the Washington Accords, and what concrete steps the United States must now take if it wishes to restore credibility to its diplomacy in the Great Lakes region. Introduction: A Confession Wrapped in Grievance The interview, conducted by François Soudan and published in Jeune Afrique on 3 April 2026, is one of the most candid public statements Paul Kagame has made on Rwanda's military role in the DRC. Its significance does not lie in revealing something previously unknown. Th...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute