Skip to main content

[AfricaWatch] UN backlash as Uganda's 'anti-gay' minister heads for human rights top job | World | The Guardian

 


Secretary-Generalmeeting with H.E. Mr. Sam K. Kutesa, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Uganda.
Sam Kutesa, Uganda's foreign minister, with Ban Ki-moon, the UN's secretary-general. Photograph: UN Photo/Eskinder Debebe/SG's Office

The United Nations is facing a chorus of criticism over the inauguration as president of its general assembly of Uganda's foreign minister, just four months after that country enforced a brutal and widely denounced anti-gay law.

Sam Kutesa will become ceremonial head of the world parliament on 11 June. There will be no ballots cast and he will be "elected by acclamation", as he is the only candidate for the 12-month post, having been chosen by t he African Union for the job that falls this year to Africa on a Buggins' turn basis.

But as the appointment nears, questions are being asked about his track record of alleged corruption, as well as his role as cabinet member of a government that has enacted one of the most virulent homophobic laws on the globe. Voices of disapproval have spread from Uganda to the general assembly's home in New York and to the US senate.

New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand said: "It would be disturbing to see the foreign minister of a country that passed an unjust, harsh and discriminatory law based on sexual orientation preside over the UN general assembly." In the UK the rights campaigner Peter Tatchell has called on the government to intervene. "David Cameron and William Hague should be lobbying the UN to block Kutesa's appointment on the grounds that his political record is inconsistent with UN principles," he said.

Advertisement

Uganda's president, Yoweri Museveni, signed the anti-homosexuality act in February. It builds on an existing ban on homosexuality dating back to British colonial times and authorises life imprisonment for "repeat homosexuals" – couples in a committed relationship; seven-year sentences for anyone helping gay people to avoid detection; and five years in prison for "promotion of homosexuality".

Kutesa, as Uganda's foreign affairs chief, was responsible for defending the law in the face of international condemnation. Though less virulent in his advocacy than Museveni – who has called gay people "disgusting" – Kutesa said "the majority of Africans abhor this practice". He added that "we shall not accept promotion and exhibition, because we think that is wrong for our young people and it offends our culture".

His new role as president of the UN general assembly will be largely figurative. He will chair meetings of the assembly – including the annual shindig of all 193 nations in New York in September that will be addressed by President Obama, Cameron and other world leaders – but in other respects his influence will be limited.

None the less, the elevation of such a controversial figure to such a prevalent seat in the world body is disconcerting to a growing number. "There are real concerns about Sam Kutesa's commitment to the values embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, including his defence of Uganda's profoundly discriminatory anti-homosexuality law," said Maria Burnett, an expert on Africa at Human Rights Watch.

Advertisement

A Change.org petition calling on the Obama administration to revoke Kutesa's visa to enter the US and thus prevent him taking up the presidency has attracted almost 3,000 signatures. It was written by a Ugandan, Milton Allimadi, who edits the New York-based site Black Star News. Allimadi said that Kutesa represented "the very antithesis of what the UN is supposed to embody globally – peace, security and human rights for everyone".

Asked recently what he thought about the petition, Kutesa said: "I'm not bothered by that, because it's incorrect. It's a lie."

The Ugandan mission to the UN in New York said there was no one available for comment.

In addition to the gay issue, Kutesa has also been criticised for persistent allegations of corruption. A lawyer by training, he is extremely wealthy and owns several luxury properties in Kampala. In 1999 he was censured by the Ugandan parliament for alleged misuse of his office. In 2009 he wasnamed in a confidential US diplomatic cable disclosed by WikiLeaks as one of three senior government ministers Museveni had failed to hold "accountable for corruption allegations". Two years later he was forced to step down as minister after he and two other cabinet members were accused in parliament of accepting bribes from a foreign oil company – he was reinstated in 2012, but only after the investigation into the three wasquashed by court order.

Cissy Kagaba of the Anti-Corruption Coalition Uganda in Kampala said that Kutesa's elevation to such a prominent UN role was sending the wrong message: "It says that people who have been linked to alleged corruption can still represent their country, and that will make the fight against it much more difficult."

__._,_.___

Posted by: Nzinink <nzinink@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.
More News:http://changingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaWatch@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaWatch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaWatch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaWatch-owner@yahoogroups.com
__________________________________________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.

Sponsors:
http://www.datingwithoutborders.com
http://www.eyumbina.com
http://www.foraha.net
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Online Scholarships for Higher Education And Research (OSHEAR): http://www.oshear.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute