Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Inner City Press - 2 hours ago: On Rwanda 1994, New Cables Show Ladsous "Wryly Noting," Now Stonewalling

 

On Rwanda 1994, New Cables Show Ladsous "Wryly Noting," Now Stonewalling

Inner City Press - 2 hours ago
By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, June 3, 2014 -- Newly released cables about Rwanda in
1994 from (some) members of the UN Security Council have a direct
connection to today's UN.

A June 1994 US cable, including "to NSC for Rice and Steinberg,"
recounts that "the French Deputy PR wryly noted that, once in Rwanda,
it would become France's highest priority to ensure that others made
available the troops that would allow France to depart."
Click here for just released document.

The "French Deputy" Permanent Representative to the UN during the
Rwanda genocide was Herve Ladsous -- now the head of UN Peacekeeping,
even as it "welcomes" and mischaracterizes a false surrender of the
Hutu FDLR militia rather than "neutralizing" them.

Inner City Press has previously reported, with documents, on
Ladsous' role during the Rwanda genocide, for example publishing this
cable by Ladsous himself. (The set just released has New Zealand, for
example, but not France.)

After that, Ladsous began refusing to answer Inner City Press'
questions. This continued on May 29, 2014, on questions about rapes by
the Congolese Army and UN drones solicited for Mali, here.

Background:

On April 7, 2014, the 20th anniversary of the beginning of the
genocide against the Tutsis in Rwanda, Ladsous openly refused to
answer Inner City Press' question about when MONUSCO will belatedly go
after the Hutu FDLR militia, saying "Mister, you know I never answer
your questions and you know very well why."

Video here.

Why, then? Ladsous was France's Deputy Permanent Representative at the
UN in 1994 during the Rwanda genocide, and he argued for French
policies including the escape of the genocidaires into Eastern Congo.

See sample memo, here.

Ladsous would certainly like that 1994 memo to disappear - in fact, by
refusing to answer Press questions he tries to disappear the issue.
But consider this:

On the old MONUC missions website, MONUC.org, was this about former UN
staffer Callixte Mbarushimana:

"Callixte Mbarushimana in Paris"

"The serious and consistent allegations against Callixte Mbarushimana,
the executive secretary of the FDLR, have been a source of
considerable embarrassment for the UN for many years. After the
evacuation of foreign staff, the 44-year-old computer technician
appointed himself as Officer-in-Charge of the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) in Rwanda, from 10 April to 4 July 1994.
He is accused by dozens of witnesses, including former colleagues,
militiamen and local administrators, of used his position, and the
resources, of the UNDP, to advance the policy of massacres, including
the murder of Tutsis who worked for the UNDP. Dressed in military
fatigues, armed with a gun and carrying grenades in his belt,
witnesses say that he lent the vehicles and satellite telephones of
the UNDP to militaryofficers, that he also used the UNDP vehicles to
facilitate his own contribution to the killings."

On a previous April 7, Inner City Press had written about
Mbarushimana, citing and linking to MONUC.org.

But attempting it on April 7, 2014 it emerged that the UN has not only
abandoned the website of its largest and longest running peacekeeping
mission - it has allowed a for profit company PathwayInternet.com to
take it over. So much for preserving memory. Under Ladsous, the goal
seems to be to censor or disappear memory.

Also in Ladsous' UN Peacekeeping there is a process of not speaking in
the first place. At the event on April 7, 2014 where Ladsous refused
to answer, Inner City Press also asked why for example Ladsous'
Western Sahara mission MINURSO has no social media presence. It is
listed at the bottom of UN Peacekeeping's website as a "missions with
no social media presence."

The answer given -- not by Ladsous, who refuses Inner City Press
questions -- is that for some missions, countries do no give
permission for certain equipment or, apparently, Twitter accounts. But
who could it be, banning MINURSO in Western Sahara from social media?

Ladsous tries to spoonfeed information to friendly scribes; in his
favor first the UN Correspondents Association (requested by Agence
France Presse) then the current spokesperson of UN Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon have made threats to discourage coverage. There's more on
this - but this is today's video, here; this is today's UN. Watch this
site.
Follow @innercitypress Follow @FUNCA_info
* * *
These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN
Click for BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are
available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&source=s&u=http://www.innercitypress.com/ladsous1wrycable060314.html&hl=en-CA&ei=MVyOU6fLD47SmAeqvIGYCg&wsc=vb&ct=np&whp=3161

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire domestique:
heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada (GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___

Posted by: Jean Bosco Sibomana <sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sponsors:

http://www.rencontressansfrontieres.com
http://www.intimitesafricaines.com
http://www.foraha.net
-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

OIF : Louise Mushikiwabo, une candidature embarrassante pour un troisième mandat de trop

C'était en novembre 2025, à Kigali. En marge de la 46e Conférence ministérielle de la Francophonie, Louise Mushikiwabo prenait la parole avec l'assurance de celle qui n'a rien à craindre : de nombreux pays, affirmait-elle, lui avaient demandé de se représenter. Spontanément. Naturellement. Unanimement presque. Sauf que les faits racontent une tout autre histoire. L'annonce qui ne devait pas avoir lieu si tôt Novembre 2025. Le Centre de Conventions de Kigali accueille plus de 400 délégués des 90 États membres de l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie. Le thème officiel porte sur les femmes et l'égalité des genres, trente ans après Pékin. Mais en marge des séances plénières, c'est une autre affaire qui agite les couloirs : Louise Mushikiwabo vient d'annoncer qu'elle souhaite briguer un troisième mandat. L'annonce est prématurée. Délibérément. Les candidatures ne ferment qu'en avril 2026. Aucun autre pays n'a encore ...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute