Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] FW: [fondationbanyarwanda] Re: *DHR* Declassified U.N. câbles reveal turning point in Rwanda crisis of 1994

 

Monsieur Tuvugishukuri,  je pense que vous  devriez donner aux nautes des faits plus palpables (et non des declarations sentimentales) et aussi laissez madame Murebwayire servir le plat du jour quite a l'assister en apportant la soupiere de sauce-viande! 
Aidez les rwandais a ouvrir les yeux en leur envoyant encore et encore le link  http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB472/ ! Recommandez les de considerer attentivement les faits reveles le 4 avril 1994  [Document 2]  et [Document 1],  les faits reveles le 7 avril 1994 (  Document 20 SMS, 7 Apr 94 ) , les faits reveles le 8 avril 1994 (deux jours apres l'assassinat d'Habyarimana )  Document 3   (surtout point 7) [Document 6] , les faits du 11 avril  et du 12 avril 1944 [Document 4] et  [Document 5] sans oublier l'intervention a l'ONU du 30 avril 1994  http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB117/Rw29.pdf  . Qui a du temps peut aussi lire d'autres faits dans les document 5 a 40, lisez par exemple documents 14, 16, 17, 18! 
Toutes ces informations recouppees avec les trouvailles du TPIR d'Arusha tel que resumees dans le livre du Prof B. Lugan '' Rwanda, un genocide en questions, 2014" montre bien la ou il faut chercher le noeud gordien de la tragedie rwandaise. 
Monsieur JMV Ndagijimana, l'auteur du livre " Kagame a sacrifie les Tutsi, 2009" comme Monsieur T. Gakwaya ainsi que d'autres sages connaisseurs peuvent aussi continuer a nous aider a nous defaire des mensonges des vainqueurs militaires! 
Merci tous,  nautes, et que Madame Agnes Murebwayire me pardonne que je mette excetionnellement son e-mail ici afin que je sois sur que mon propos lui est bien arrive.


Rwanda, reka guhora ulira uhogora ugereka (by'ikinyoma) ibyago wagwishije ku bagususurutsaga. Ni papa afatanije na bamwe muli bakuru bawe no mu beza wibyaliye bakuroshye! 
Icyokora urahirwe ukomeze ube nka wa muhungu wasanze se yanzitse umukazana (muka-muhungu) nuko akareba akanuma. Uzi ko se yageze igihe akikura, agataha, yagera iwe agahamagara wa muhungu akamutereka ubuki anamugabira, atibagiwe no kwambika nyina w'iyo ntwali urumugera kubirenge! Wibuke ko umuhungu warakaye agashyira umubyeyi ku karubanda yahise abura byose, ndetse aranavumwa! 
Urabona kandi ko Papa  (C) yazanye na mukuru wawe (B) bagasanga umwiza (K) ngo bagerageze kuba bagusubiza uburanga bakugomwe. Baragukinguliza inzugi z'ibigega binyuranye: ali ibyuzuye imfashanyo,  ali ibiteza imbere amashuli,  ali ibya Loni byuzuye amadolari, n'ibindi. 
Mbiswa da! Utaziyondora ni shahuli yake.   


To: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr; fondationbanyarwanda@yahoogroupes.fr; rwanda_revolution@yahoogroups.com; netherlands_group@yahoogroups.com; ibukabose_rengerabose@yahoogroupes.fr
From: fondationbanyarwanda@yahoogroupes.fr
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 11:41:03 -0700
Subject: [fondationbanyarwanda] Re: *DHR* Declassified U.N. câbles reveal turning point in Rwanda crisis of 1994

 


 Ms. Agnès,
Je voudrais vous "informer" que ce message n'a rien de vérité. Ils appellent ça declacified documents kugira ngo ingiji zigire ngo nibyo. This is what is called desinformation. We still have the real information about the mastermind of the Rwanda genocide. Who, how, when ahd where the genocide was planed. 


It doesn't depend on you whether or not I exist. If you don't like me, don't accept my invitation and don't invite me to come and see you. Whether you like it or not, history is on my side, I will bury you.
Jean-Christophe, Utrecht,April 3rd, 2004.
Nothing but Human rights. We Will Win ! 
 



From: "agnesmurebwayire@yahoo.fr [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 8:34 PM
Subject: *DHR* Declassified U.N. câbles reveal turning point in Rwanda crisis of 1994

 



Mark Landler - nytimes.com, June 3, 2014


On April 12, 1994, six days after a plane carrying Rwanda's president was shot down, setting off a wave of killings, Madeleine K. Albright, the American ambassador to the United Nations at the time, sent a cable to the State Department proposing that the United States take the lead in pushing to withdraw most of the United Nations peacekeeping force operating there.

Ms. Albright's tersely worded cable, recently declassified, starkly captures the reluctance of the United States to respond to the deepening crisis in Rwanda. When most of the United Nations force was withdrawn shortly afterward, leaving the violence almost completely unchecked, the crisis rapidly escalated into one of history's most grimly efficient genocides, with some 800,000 people killed in less than 100 days.

Twenty years after the genocide, the National Security Archive and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum have obtained nearly 300 secret cables from the United States, Britain, New Zealand and other members of the United Nations Security Council during the fateful weeks when events in Rwanda spiraled out of control.

The documents, which the groups posted on their websites on Monday, offer a vivid record of closed-door debates, in which the diplomats, lacking accurate information and scarred by a disastrous military mission in Somalia months earlier, voted to pull out most of the peacekeepers at the very moment that they could have curbed the killing.

"It's clear, in hindsight, that the pullout of peacekeeping was the green light for genocide," said Tom Blanton, director of the National Security Archive at George Washington University, which, along with the Holocaust Museum, is sponsoring a conference this week in The Hague on how the world handled the Rwanda crisis.

Cameron Hudson, the acting director of the Holocaust Museum's Center for the Prevention of Genocide, said, "It looks very cold and doesn't paint any of the big countries in a good light."

President Bill Clinton has described his administration's inaction as one of the greatest regrets of his time in office. Ms. Albright, who has also expressed regret, said in an interview that she welcomed the release of the cables because she hoped a fuller exploration of that period would contribute to policies that would prevent future atrocities.

"I was an instructed ambassador, not the secretary of state, but I do wish I had argued harder," said Ms. Albright, who became secretary of state during Mr. Clinton's second term.

On April 14, after Belgium announced that it would pull its troops from the peacekeeping force in Rwanda, the Security Council debated whether to beef up the mission to help protect civilians, withdraw it entirely or scale it back to a rump force, largely for symbolic value. The United States and Britain favored the third option.

"I understood why there had been talk of protecting civilians," the British ambassador at the time, Sir David Hannay, wrote in a cable. "But even a vastly increased and better equipped UNAMIR would find such a broad mandate difficult to fulfill," he said using the acronym for the peacekeeping force, United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda.

In her April 12 cable, Ms. Albright said there was a "window of opportunity" to withdraw the bulk of the force because the airport in the capital, Kigali, was still under the control of Belgian and French troops. She advocated leaving behind a "skeletal staff that might be able to facilitate a cease-fire and any future political negotiations."

On April 21, after a week in which 10,000 Rwandans were killed in Kigali alone, the Security Council voted to reduce the size of the force to 270 troops from 2,100. The remaining peacekeepers found themselves "standing knee-deep in mutilated bodies," said Roméo Dallaire, the Canadian general who commanded the United Nations force.

Ms. Albright said she did not recall the specific cable pushing for a withdrawal, but she confirmed that the White House, and even more so Congress, were deeply leery of getting more involved in Rwanda after the United States' disastrous experience in Somalia, where two Black Hawk helicopters were shot down, setting off a firefight that left 18 Americans dead. The bodies of several soldiers were dragged through the streets of Mogadishu.

At the National Security Council, Richard A. Clarke, a counterterrorism adviser to Mr. Clinton, was trying to scale back American involvement in United Nations peacekeeping operations, in part to fend off lawmakers who wanted to end them altogether.


One of the missing pieces in the newly declassified trove of documents, researchers said, are roughly 100 internal White House emails on Rwanda, which would shed light on the marching orders Ms. Albright was getting from the White House.

These emails are held by the Clinton presidential library, Mr. Blanton said, but the White House has not signed off on a declassification request he submitted nine months ago. "The American declassification system does not have any rationality built into it," he said.

But the other declassified cables offer a window into African countries' frustration with the West's reluctance to act. On May 5, 1994, the ambassador from Nigeria, Ibrahim Gambari, who was then leader of the Security Council, warned that it needed to do something very soon; otherwise, it would be a "laughingstock."

Ms. Albright said Mr. Gambari's arguments persuaded her that the United States risked being on the wrong side of history. At one point, she left a Security Council meeting and placed a heated call to Washington to resist its demands for a complete withdrawal.

"I wanted to have more flexibility," she said, "but the options for having a large operation were so difficult."

Even if the political will for major intervention had existed, by that time, it was probably too late to prevent Rwanda from becoming a charnel house. But for the leaders today, who are confronting mass violence in Syria, South Sudan and the Central African Republic, Rwanda stands as a cautionary tale of what happens when the world dithers.

"We struggled through this in Darfur and the Balkans," Mr. Hudson said. "Now the knee-jerk reaction is to get more troops in, to smother the violence before it breaks out."

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/04/world/africa/un-cables-reveal-a-turning-point-in-rwanda-crisis.html?action=click&module=Search&region=searchResults&mabReward=relbias%3Ar&url=http%3A%2F%2Fquery.nytimes.com%2Fsearch%2Fsitesearch%2F%3Faction%3Dclick%26region%3DMasthead%26pgtype%3DHomepage%26module%3DSearchSubmit%26contentCollection%3DHomepage%26t%3Dqry478%23%2FDeclassified+U.N.+Cables+Reveal+Turning+Point+in+Rwanda+Crisis+of+1994&_r=0





__._,_.___

Posted by: kota venant <kotakori@hotmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines ne fonctionnent pas contre le Rwanda

Pourquoi Paul Kagame a ignoré les sanctions américaines et la Résolution 2773 du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU Entre février 2025 et mars 2026, le Trésor américain a imposé deux séries de sanctions ciblant directement la machine de guerre du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo : d'abord James Kabarebe, ministre d'État rwandais et principal intermédiaire du régime auprès du M23, puis les Forces de défense rwandaises en tant qu'entité, ainsi que quatre de leurs hauts responsables. Chacun des individus sanctionnés est demeuré en poste. Les FDR ne se sont pas retirées. Cette analyse examine pourquoi les mesures de Washington n'ont pas modifié la conduite du Rwanda — et pourquoi, selon les propres mots de Kagame, elles sont rejetées comme l'œuvre des « simplement stupides ».     Introduction : des sanctions sans conséquence La campagne de sanctions de Washington contre les opérations militaires du Rwanda dans l'est du Congo s'...

Mozambique : Renforcer l’armée mozambicaine pour remplacer le Rwanda — une orientation profondément juste

Mozambique : Renforcer l'armée mozambicaine pour remplacer le Rwanda — une orientation profondément juste L'Union européenne met fin au financement des Forces de défense rwandaises au Mozambique : analyse des enjeux de souveraineté, d'opportunité économique confisquée, de fuite de capitaux et de reconstruction d'une capacité nationale de défense   Introduction : une décision européenne qui remet les pendules à l'heure La décision de l'Union européenne de ne pas renouveler son financement aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) déployées au Mozambique est bien plus qu'un simple ajustement budgétaire. Elle marque un tournant dans la région des Grands Lacs et en Afrique australe, et soulève des questions fondamentales sur la souveraineté mozambicaine, l'économie politique de la sécurité régionale, et la responsabilité de la communauté internationale envers les peuples africains. Depuis juillet 2021, plus de deux...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute