Skip to main content

[AfricaWatch] RPF sustained propaganda on Hutu being rapists

 


The most recent occurrences of such propaganda were on 10 and 14 February 2014, in Paris and Seattle respectively. During the ongoing court hearing of the case of Captain Simbikangwa who is accused of genocide in Paris, the French journalist Francois Dupaquier claimed that raping Tutsi girls was part of a Hutu ritual for young males of that community in order to become adults. This was publicly stated on 10 February 2014.

Being Rwandan well aware of the culture of my country, unless RPF might have changed it since 1994 as this is when I left it – even with that no contact back home has mentioned the raping new culture by young Hutu, I was astonished to read such story of raping Tutsis as a rite of passage. The question which came to mind was this: Having learnt that that Jean-Francois Dupaquier was married to a Tutsi woman, could his statement come from explanations from his partner as part of certain realities of their intimate life, or was it the result of his investigative work as journalist? I could not be fixed.

Four days later, after the public claim of Dupaquier in Paris, more than 10,000 miles away in Seattle – California, President Paul Kagame of Rwanda stood in front of an American audience and uttered the same insanity about Hutus. He highlighted his story showing how fundamentally rapists they were from a more subtle and soft perspective. He referred to a story [see and listen to the clip] of a Tutsi woman raped in 1994 who came to him seeking his assistance about the child born out of such regrettable incident. The story was narrated on 14 February 2014.

I realized that these two statements were not made almost in the same period by pure coincidence. Similar stories about Hutus are being propagated around in Rwanda, Africa and the rest of the world. Probably the Rwandan Patriotic Front of President Kagame, seeing its rating among Westerners going down dramatically, has spotted that playing the Hutu rapist card could change the trend.

Since 7 January 2014 the Rwandan regime is out and loud remembering the 20th anniversary of the 1994 genocide. Everything is being done using all available imagination to tarnish further the image of Hutus, particularly when plenty of evidence is today pointing at direct responsibility of the Rwandan president in that national tragedy.

Another point is that 20 years have passed and the regime has committed enormous atrocities inside and outside the country, this under an indescribable dictatorship. Victims amount in millions, Rwandans, Ugandans, and more significantly Congolese. Kagame and his power are declining dangerously. As a consequence, he needs to use the opportunity of the 20th anniversary of the genocide to rebuild his image by especially tarnishing more Hutus, who are gradually getting politically organized.

Related documents

Petition: Denoncer la declaration anti-Hutu du journaliste Jean Francois Dupaquier

Ongoing hearing of Simbikangwa in Paris

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
----------------------------------------------------------
The Voice of the Poor, the Weak and Powerless.
More News:http://changingafrica.blogspot.co.uk/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Post message:  AfricaWatch@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: AfricaWatch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: AfricaWatch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: AfricaWatch-owner@yahoogroups.com
-----------------------------
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute