Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Peacekeeping in Africa allocated R1.5bn in budget

 

Peacekeeping in Africa allocated R1.5bn in budget

BY WYNDHAM HARTLEY, 2014-02-27 05:44:21.0

Companies and organisations:
Department of Defence | South African Police Service | South African
National Defence Force

SOUTH Africa's contribution to peacekeeping in Africa and combating
piracy off the east coast will cost R1.5bn in 2014-15.

The participation of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF)
in the special intervention unit the United Nations (UN) Security
Council approved for the Democratic Republic of Congo will also cost
the Department of Defence an additional R150m.

These costs form part of an effectively reduced allocation to defence,
public order and safety, with smaller than inflation increases. The
estimate of expenditure says the regional security programme "provides
for the deployment of forces in support of South Africa's commitment
to regional, continental and global security".

"Funding is distributed according to the number, size and duration of
deployments, and the systems and equipment required for operations.
The SANDF participates in the UN peace support operation in the Congo
and the African Union peace support operation in Sudan, provides
training for the armed forces in the Central African Republic and
executes operations in support of the Mozambican Defence Force's
counter piracy operations in the Mozambique channel."

In depth: Budget 2014

 News, views and analysis of Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan's 2014 budget

The SANDF participated in five external missions in 2013-14.

The focus of the force employment programme in the Department of
Defence budget will "be on conducting foreign peace support, border
safeguarding and antipiracy operations".

The average annual growth in the allocations to the South African
Police Service (SAPS) over the medium term is estimated to be 6%,
meaning the SAPS is losing ground to inflation. The same applies to
the Department of Defence, with a 6% increase between 2013-14 and
2016-17. The Department of Correctional Services is in a worse
situation, with an average annual increase of 5.6%.

Only the allocation for the operation of courts keeps pace with
inflation, with an increase of 6.9% over the medium term. The budget
review records that "spending on economic and general public services,
and defence, public order and safety is expected to slow, reflecting
the need to adjust resources to address spending pressures and
priorities".

The treading water budget allocation comes at a time when the
Department of Defence is having to cut back on operations — including
mothballing Gripen jet fighters and Agusta helicopters — for want of
funds to fly them.

The expenditure growth in the medium term is expected to be just over
5%. Growth between 2010 and 2014 was 10%.

http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&hl=en-CA&u=http://www.bdlive.co.za/national/2014/02/27/peacekeeping-in-africa-allocated-r1.5bn-in-budget&q=Peacekeeping+in+Africa+allocated+R1.5bn+in+budget

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute