Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Rwanda slams France for blocking genocide extraditions

 

Rwanda slams France for blocking genocide extraditions

on February 27, 2014 at 1:23 pm in News

PARIS - Rwanda on Thursday condemned a decision by France's top court
to block the extradition of three genocide suspects and expressed hope
they would be tried on French soil.

The French Court of Cassation on Wednesday overturned a November
appeals court ruling approving the extradition of Claude Muhayimana
and Innocent Musabyimana.

It also upheld a September decision by another court rejecting the
extradition of Laurent Serubuga, a former colonel, also wanted by
Kigali over the 1994 massacres that claimed some 800,000 victims, most
of them from the minority Tutsi ethnic group.

In a statement Rwanda's ambassador in Paris said the rulings "once
more provide impunity for those people living on French soil who are
accused of participating in the genocide against Tutsis in 1994."

He urged the French authorities to ensure the three men are put on
trial in France.

"It is difficult to imagine France, the birthplace of human rights,
becoming a haven of peace and impunity for so many of those who took
part in the genocide of Tutsis."

Muhayimana, a French citizen since 2010, is accused of taking part in
a massacre of ethnic Tutsis in the western town of Kibuye and
Musabyimana faces similar accusations over killings in the
northwestern province of Gisenyi.

The Court of Cassation said the two men could not be extradited for
trial for a crime which was not legally defined in Rwanda at the time
the acts were committed.

Genocide was only made a punishable crime in Rwanda in 1996, with
further legislation on the issue being adopted in 2004.

Serubuga, a deputy chief of staff of the Rwandan army at the time of
the genocide, was detained in France in July last year following an
international arrest warrant issued by a Rwandan court.

In September, a court in the northern French town of Douai ruled
against extradition on the grounds that the warrant was issued more
than 10 years after the alleged crimes.

Under French law, there is no statute of limitations on prosecutions
for genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes, regardless of
where in the world they were committed.

Former Rwandan army captain Pascal Simbikangwa is currently on trial
in Paris for complicity in the Rwandan genocide in the first case of
its kind to come to court.

Muhayimana could be next. A judicial investigation was opened against
him in a Paris court in June last year for crimes against humanity.

http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/02/rwanda-slams-france-blocking-genocide-extraditions/

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

Rubaya Mine Under USA’s Control: Kagame Has No Grounds to Object.

Rubaya Mine: Strategic Interests, Regional Conflict and the DRC–USA Cooperation Framework Rubaya mine, located in Masisi territory in North Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, is a Congolese resource. It was a Congolese resource before the M23 advanced on it, it remains a Congolese resource today, and it will remain a Congolese resource regardless of what any regional actor claims, implies or pursues. That is not a political position. It is a statement of international law and sovereign right. This foundational point must be stated plainly because it is frequently obscured in discussions about the conflict in eastern Congo. Debates about security narratives, mineral partnerships and geopolitical alignment risk creating a false impression that Rubaya's ownership or governance is somehow open to negotiation between external parties. It is not. The Democratic Republic of the Congo holds sovereign authority over its territory and its natural resources. N...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute