Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Uganda: Anti-Homosexuality Law Will Come at a Serious Cost

 

Uganda: Anti-Homosexuality Law Will Come at a Serious Cost

Human Rights Watch - 2 hours ago

If Museveni signs the Anti-Homosexuality bill, it would be yet another
blow to fundamental human rights in Uganda. Uganda's international
partners need to show unequivocally that if this bill is passed, it
will not be business as usual with the Ugandan government.
Daniel Bekele, Africa director

(Nairobi) - Uganda's pending Anti-Homosexuality bill violates the
country's human rights obligations and is a barrier to advancing
critical public health goals.Uganda's international donor partners
should clearly and publicly specify the consequences for relations
with Uganda if the Anti-Homosexuality bill becomes law. Uganda's
parliament passed the bill on December 20, 2013, and President Yoweri
Museveni has indicated that he intends to sign the bill.

The bill would increase penalties for some forms of consensual
same-sex conduct between adults, curtail constitutionally protected
rights to privacy, family life, and equality, and violate the rights
to freedom of association and expression. Museveni's government, over
his 28 years in office, has increasingly suppressed freedom of
assembly, expression, and association and threatened civil society
groups working on a range of issues, including corruption, land, oil,
and good governance. This bill is the latest troubling sign of
disregard for fundamental human rights protections.

"If Museveni signs the Anti-Homosexuality bill, it would be yet
another blow to fundamental human rights in Uganda," said Daniel
Bekele, Africa director. "Uganda's international partners need to show
unequivocally that if this bill is passed, it will not be business as
usual with the Ugandan government."

Uganda's constitution, in article 29, contains strong protections for
freedom of expression, conscience, and belief. The Ugandan Human
Rights Commission, Uganda Law Society, and the Foundation for Human
Rights Initiative have all publicly criticized the Anti-Homosexuality
bill as unconstitutional.Because the bill criminalizes the undefined
"promotion" of homosexuality, there are far-reaching implications
beyond the increase in punishments for same-sex sexual conduct. If the
bill is passed, a person could go to prison simply for expressing an
opinion. Public health promotion and prevention efforts targeting "at
risk" groups might have to be curtailed, and health educators and
health care providers could be at risk of criminal prosecution.

Local and international nongovernmental organizations doing advocacy
work on human rights issues would be similarly in peril. A range of
foreign-funded programs, especially in the health and human rights
sectors, would likely be forced to end their work or face criminal
sanction because the bill's criminalization of promotion blatantly
curtails the rights to free expression for anyone in Uganda, including
foreigners.

Uganda's international partners, including the United States, the UK,
and the EU, have consistently condemned the bill over the many years
it has been pending in Uganda's parliament. On February 17,

President Barack Obama said the bill's passage would "complicate" the
US-Uganda relationship, but did not specify the precise consequences.
The US and other international donors routinely engage with the
Ugandan government on a range of security and counterterrorism issues
across Africa.

The US should strongly demonstrate its concern for Uganda's
deteriorating human rights environment by temporarily recalling the US
ambassador and the US Agency for International Development Uganda
director to Washington, DC, for strategic consultations.. Uganda's
Civil Society Coalition for Human Rights and Constitutional Law,
consisting of 51 local nongovernmental groups opposed to the bill, has

also recommended such a recall.

The US should also review funding assistance to Uganda to ensure that
US funding is not used to further prosecution of anyone under the law.
In particular funding for the police should be subject to close
scrutiny as they would be legally mandated to enforce this law. All
US-funded health research, especially related to HIV, might also need
to be re-reviewed by ethics committees to examine if research
participants face negative consequences from the law or if health
personnel are at risk of prosecution.

"There is real urgency now that Museveni has stated his intention to
sign the bill," Bekele said. "The US should temporarily recall the
ambassador to conduct strategic consultations on the US/Uganda
relationship, while making clear the range of concerns for yet another
clawback to human rights in Uganda."

http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&hl=en-CA&u=http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/02/19/uganda-anti-homosexuality-law-will-come-serious-cost&q=Uganda:+Anti-Homosexuality+Law+Will+Come+at+a+Serious+Cost

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute