Skip to main content

[RwandaLibre] Uganda MPs falsified gay report

 

Uganda MPs falsified gay report

Mail & Guardian Online - 8 hours ago

The ministerial team tasked with advising President Yoweri Museveni on
homosexuality falsified and twisted information in an expert
scientific report.

Documents in the possession of the Mail & Guardian show that the
Ugandan ministerial task team asked by the president to advise him on
homosexuality falsified the information contained in the report given
by medical and psychological experts, twisting it to show that
homosexuality should indeed be further criminalised.

The law, which Uganda's Parliament passed in December 2013, proposes
severe penalties for same-sex romantic and sexual behaviour.

Read: Minutes of the first task force meeting on the homosexuality debate

Read: Minutes of the second task force meeting on the homosexuality debate

Read: National Resistance Movement Caucus report

Read: Uganda scientist consensus statement on homosexuality

Under international pressure, President Yoweri Museveni delayed
signing the controversial Bill into law, asking for a panel of experts
to be convened to advise on whether homosexuality was "learned"
behaviour or an inborn condition.

The experts - including academics from Marekere University and
officials in the Ugandan ministry of health - said that, in their view
and in terms of the best current medical knowledge, "homosexuality has
no clear-cut cause", though they adduce some limited genetic evidence,
and that "several factors are involved which differ from individual to
individual. It is not a disease that has a treatment."

The Scientist Consensus Statement concludes that homosexuality is not
a disease or an "abnormality", but that it "can be influenced by
environmental factors" such as "culture, religion, information,
permissiveness". Homosexual behaviour, the statement says, "needs
regulation like any other human behaviour, especially to protect the
vulnerable", and concludes: "There is need for studies to address
sexualities in the African context."

By contrast, in the report to the president in the name of the caucus
of the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM), this is glossed as:
"Homosexuality is not a disease but merely an abnormal behaviour which
may be learned through experiences in life." It quotes the experts
saying that the "practice should be regulated", following that with
the statement: "Presidential Advisor on Science Dr Richard
Tushemereirwe stated that homosexuality has serious Public Health
consequences and should therefore not be tolerated."

Tushemereirwe was not part of the 10-member scientists' panel.

'Victory for Uganda'

The Bill was first mooted in Uganda in 2009, when it proposed the
death penalty for homosexual activities. A global outcry followed,
with objections raised then and later by African rights groups and
Western politicians and donors, but MPs finally pushed the Bill
through Parliament in December.

MP David Bahati, the Bill's sponsor, said it was a "victory for
Uganda" and for African tradition against Western influences. But the
anti-gay thrust of the Bill has also been driven by Christian
evangelical groups working in Uganda. Gay activists from Uganda sued
American missionary Scott Lively, under the "alien torts" law, for
spreading homophobia in Africa. Other

African countries such as Nigeria have recently passed anti-gay laws

.
The new law, which awaits Museveni's signature, updates a colonial-era
law regulating "carnal knowledge against the order of nature". It
extends the penalty of life imprisonment for actual gay sex to all
behaviour, including touching, that might lead to or show an intention
to have homosexual sex: it penalises "any erotic behaviour intended to
cause sexual excitement or any indecent act or behaviour tending to
corrupt morals".

Earlier this year, in a letter to a Ugandan newspaper, Museveni wrote:
"You cannot call an abnormality an alternative orientation. It could
be that the Western societies, on account of random breeding, have
generated many abnormal people." He added that he thought others might
become gay for "mercenary reasons" or, in the case of lesbians, a lack
of sex with men.

The law also makes it a crime, punishable by a prison term of up to
seven years, for a citizen to fail to report homosexual activity to
the authorities.

US President Barack Obama called the law "odious". Human Rights Watch
has said it is "appalling", even without the death sentence. Amnesty
International said the law "amounts to a grave assault on human
rights".

The Ugandan Parliament also passed a law banning pornography and other
forms of what it regards as sexual titillation, such as miniskirts.

Shaun de Waal has worked at the Mail & Guardian since 1989 and is now
the editor of the paper's comment and analysis section.

Read more from Shaun de Waal
Twitter: @shaundewaal

http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&hl=en-CA&u=http://mg.co.za/article/2014-02-22-uganda-mps-falsified-gay-report&q=Uganda+MPs+falsified+gay+report

--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire
domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada
(GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

__,_._,___

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ?

Pourquoi les sanctions américaines contre le Rwanda sont-elles si importantes ? Auteur : The African Rights Campaign. Londres, Royaume-Uni Publié en : mars 2026   Introduction Lorsqu'un gouvernement est accusé d'exécutions extrajudiciaires, de déplacements massifs, de violences sexuelles, de violations des droits de l'homme et du pillage systématique des ressources naturelles d'un pays voisin, la réponse diplomatique attendue est un démenti catégorique, étayé par des preuves. Le Rwanda ne l'a pas fait. Lorsque le département américain du Trésor a imposé des sanctions aux Forces de défense rwandaises (FDR) et à quatre de leurs commandants les plus haut placés, le 2 mars 2026, la porte-parole officielle de Kigali, Yolande Makolo, a délivré une déclaration que les analystes diplomatiques étudieront attentivement pour ce qu'elle omet conspicuement. Elle a dit que les sanctions étaient « injustes », qu'elles ciblaient « uniquement...

Le Rwanda au Mozambique : qui les a placés là, pourquoi ils ne peuvent pas rester et pourquoi la SADC doit les remplacer avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents

  Qui a placé le Rwanda là-bas, pourquoi la France refuse de le remplacer, comment le déploiement est devenu un bouclier contre les sanctions, et pourquoi la SADC doit agir avant que les dégâts ne deviennent permanents Mars 2026   Résumé exécutif Les sanctions occidentales contre les Forces de Défense du Rwanda (RDF), imposées par les États-Unis le 2 mars 2026 en vertu du Global Magnitsky Act et relayées par une pression croissante de l'Union européenne, ont mis à nu une contradiction stratégique de premier ordre. La même force militaire sanctionnée pour son soutien opérationnel direct au groupe rebelle M23 en République démocratique du Congo est simultanément le principal garant sécuritaire d'un projet de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de 20 milliards de dollars exploité par le géant français TotalEnergies à Cabo Delgado, dans le nord du Mozambique. Cette analyse répond à trois questions interconnectées dont les réponses définissent ...

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important

Why US Sanctions Against Rwanda Are So Important Author: The African Rights Campaign. London, UK Published: March 2026   Introduction When a government is accused of extrajudicial killings, mass displacement, sexual violence, human rights abuses, and the systematic pillage of another country's mineral resources, the expected response in international diplomacy is an unequivocal denial backed by evidence. Rwanda did not do that. When the United States Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on the Rwanda Defence Force (RDF) and four of its most senior commanders on 2 March 2026, Kigali's official spokesperson Yolande Makolo made a statement that diplomatic analysts will study carefully for what it conspicuously omitted. She said the sanctions were 'unjust,' that they targeted 'only one party to the peace process,' and that they 'misrepresent the reality and distort the facts.' Rwanda's government, described by Bloomb...

BBC News

Africanews

UNDP - Africa Job Vacancies

How We Made It In Africa – Insight into business in Africa

Migration Policy Institute